|
Post by BeatlePaul on Dec 23, 2005 23:52:53 GMT
THE ONE AND ONLY TRUE GEORGE HARRISON GEORGE HARRISON OFFICIAL DOUBLE ....OOOOPSSSS ..... This last time they have forgotten to pump up his chin.... Tip: George double has a big evident scar between the eyes simulating George's true wrinkle, just different eyes and obviously a pumped up chin. Next time: John official double (tip: John's strong triangular mandible...)
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Dec 24, 2005 0:50:20 GMT
Not to alienate myself straight away but the last one is definitely george because the head shape and ears are unmistakable IMO!
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Dec 24, 2005 2:33:17 GMT
Not to alienate myself straight away but the last one is definitely george because the head shape and ears are unmistakable IMO! Don't worry Plastic Paul.... it's just the same fake man... The last picture proves that the guy had mandible sides enlargment to fix his differences with the real George Harrison. But his chin point results still too small ...
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Dec 29, 2005 6:24:06 GMT
This is just insanity. From what I've looked up of you guys, everything used to be in such a nice neat package. Everything was well put together, and held up plausibly. Now it seems everyone's slid off the deep end, with theories of replacements, counter-replacements, replacements of replacements. If all of this was true, you can bet someone would have blabbed. I'm willing to bet that more than half of this is bullsh*t and I'm not going to take this lying down.
I say now is the time for action. Responsible action. I say we go back to square one: Paul is either dead or was replaced and here's how we know. We'll leave the theorizing to those who can come up with documentation to support it that is not photo comparisons and suppositions.
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Dec 29, 2005 13:19:41 GMT
I think you'll find not everyone has slid off the deep end, if anyone.
I am skeptical about this, but i'll outline what BP is saying if you don't get it.
"GEORGE HARRISON OFFICIAL DOUBLE"
BP means that Harrison had a double that could be used for photos etc. when George himself either couldn't make it or simply couldn't be arsed.
He is not saying George was replaced or died etc.
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Dec 29, 2005 14:44:39 GMT
I know what they're trying to say, but look at all his other posts. Look at anything TI posts, for lack of a better example. I believe that there are some of us that are being deeply affected by this, emotionally and perhaps otherwise. I think we should all step back a little bit and see what we have wrought before we go forward with further theorizing. Look at what's happening and tell me that that might NOT be necessary.
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Dec 29, 2005 22:54:18 GMT
I think you'll find not everyone has slid off the deep end, if anyone. I am skeptical about this, but i'll outline what BP is saying if you don't get it. "GEORGE HARRISON OFFICIAL DOUBLE" BP means that Harrison had a double that could be used for photos etc. when George himself either couldn't make it or simply couldn't be arsed. He is not saying George was replaced or died etc. Exactly. Thank You Plastic Paul, once again. Please note the chronology of the photos. The same about John.
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Dec 29, 2005 23:55:48 GMT
??
If you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, you ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow.
??
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Dec 30, 2005 0:49:29 GMT
No thank you BP, we are not remembered for agreeing but i just felt i was re-relaying your point!
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Dec 30, 2005 0:52:59 GMT
?? If you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, you ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow. ?? ... shaking your hands Total.... John's Revolution
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Dec 30, 2005 17:32:08 GMT
?? If you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao, you ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow. ?? ... shaking your hands Total.... John's Revolution If John had lived, his influence in the peace movement would have grown tremendously, by which a mass outcry for sweeping changes in the establishment would be heard loudly in today's world. JMO.
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Dec 31, 2005 1:32:45 GMT
Yes, I agree; I doubt the world would be the same today had John lived.
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Jan 12, 2006 18:42:15 GMT
.... I know, most of you would be shocked by that but... This is the truth
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jan 13, 2006 0:38:48 GMT
Dates would be helpful.
The nose looks odd I must say.
|
|
|
Post by defhermit on Jan 13, 2006 7:13:44 GMT
hmm, the ears looks pretty different too...
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Jan 13, 2006 23:00:19 GMT
Dates would be helpful. The nose looks odd I must say. Taken about the same time.(1997-1998) The chin is what totally different. Eyebrows width, nose shape and mouth dimension are so much different too, so all the rest. For other details please see this whole thread. The Kings Are Naked!
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jan 14, 2006 6:14:36 GMT
Dates would be helpful. The nose looks odd I must say. Taken about the same time.(1997-1998) The chin is what totally different. Eyebrows width, nose shape and mouth dimension are so much different too, so all the rest. For other details please see this whole thread. The Kings Are Naked! Cortisone. Steroids. The cheeks, chin, and the tissues beside the nose bridge "swell up". This happens to people on steroids. It's a bloating, puffing up effect. OK, yes, the noses really seem to be not matching in some fairly major ways. But couldn't it because of illness or make up, picture blurriness? Pixilation? Weight issues? Weight loss can make the fatty parts of the nose beside the cartiledge shrink up a lot. Everybody has seen that on a fat friend who gets skinny, right?
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jan 14, 2006 7:39:53 GMT
Read down toward the bottom about the dorsum and tip repairs. markbermanmd.com/chapter4.aspxMy point being that the "alterations" I percieve are within the realm of light cosmetic surgery.............
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Jan 14, 2006 8:18:28 GMT
Read down toward the bottom about the dorsum and tip repairs. markbermanmd.com/chapter4.aspxMy point being that the "alterations" I percieve are within the realm of light cosmetic surgery............. Please sit down, relax and read ALL the thread again ...
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jan 14, 2006 9:33:45 GMT
Read down toward the bottom about the dorsum and tip repairs. markbermanmd.com/chapter4.aspxMy point being that the "alterations" I percieve are within the realm of light cosmetic surgery............. Please sit down, relax and read ALL the thread again ... I will. But BeatlePaul, sometimes this is a stressful avocation, yes?
|
|
|
Post by unrepentant on Jan 15, 2006 1:14:56 GMT
so what happened to the doubles when george died?
i find it fascinating that george died at faul's house [that's the story, isn't it?]
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Jan 16, 2006 9:41:16 GMT
From the beginning George Harrison was ALWAYS the same. From his beginning (1967) George Harrison double was ALWAYS the same.
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jan 19, 2006 0:07:22 GMT
Please sit down, relax and read ALL the thread again ... I will. But BeatlePaul, sometimes this is a stressful avocation, yes? Though you may not answer directly, somehow I feel a nodding sense of agreement from across the scope of this board, somewhere. ;D Now, some people have a career standing in for other folks, it's true: www.imdb.com/name/nm0905962/
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Jan 23, 2006 11:06:40 GMT
You can call me "stupid, silly, crazy" but this is the truth. We have to rethink about the Beatles story now....
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jan 23, 2006 13:06:12 GMT
Is that eric or feric!?
|
|