|
Ear.
Jul 8, 2005 9:11:00 GMT
Post by TPIMaster on Jul 8, 2005 9:11:00 GMT
|
|
|
Ear.
Jul 8, 2005 10:36:46 GMT
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Jul 8, 2005 10:36:46 GMT
whoa! there is something strange there!
plus, no earhole! (props to SunKing)
|
|
|
Ear.
Jul 8, 2005 10:39:56 GMT
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Jul 8, 2005 10:39:56 GMT
keep in mind that this is the true JPM ear:
|
|
|
Ear.
Jul 8, 2005 19:34:50 GMT
Post by BeatlePaul on Jul 8, 2005 19:34:50 GMT
AAAAHHHHH !!!!!!!!! I AM GLAD AT LAST! After 3 years people CAN SEE what I SAW!!! Do you remember JoJo? THANK YOU FRIENDS!
|
|
|
Ear.
Jul 8, 2005 19:40:55 GMT
Post by valis on Jul 8, 2005 19:40:55 GMT
that always was one of my favorite PID pics
|
|
|
Ear.
Jul 8, 2005 20:47:40 GMT
Post by beatled on Jul 8, 2005 20:47:40 GMT
Course I do, it still looks as bizarre as always. Amazingly, it was left alone in the Anthology version.
|
|
|
Ear.
Jul 8, 2005 21:03:08 GMT
Post by BeatlePaul on Jul 8, 2005 21:03:08 GMT
Sometimes Freddie Williamson work needed to be improved... For the sake of truth three years ago "our" make-up artist (he belonged to the Sun King Team) analyzing Faul's picure from Revolution video told us it was ONLY about make-up and not plastic surgery. Me (I confess) didn't believe him! Now I know he was RIGHT! Course I do, it still looks as bizarre as always. Amazingly, it was left alone in the Anthology version. Thank You JoJo!
|
|
|
Ear.
Jul 9, 2005 20:31:24 GMT
Post by BeatlePaul on Jul 9, 2005 20:31:24 GMT
John told us everything. Just looking for and find out what we need.
|
|
|
Ear.
Jul 10, 2005 11:33:30 GMT
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Jul 10, 2005 11:33:30 GMT
I see 2 layers of ear around the earhole area: I think it's a fake ear, but Billy's old earlobe is showing (he had higher ears than Paul, the're gunna put a fake ear lower than the real one).
|
|
|
Ear.
Nov 26, 2005 10:05:53 GMT
Post by BeatlePaul on Nov 26, 2005 10:05:53 GMT
This time that's really weird. It have been put on intentionally.
|
|
|
Ear.
Nov 26, 2005 14:22:17 GMT
Post by TPIMaster on Nov 26, 2005 14:22:17 GMT
Very nice!
|
|
|
Ear.
Dec 16, 2005 14:29:48 GMT
Post by TPIMaster on Dec 16, 2005 14:29:48 GMT
Don't these two ears bear differences? Or is it all an illusion?
|
|
|
Ear.
Jul 29, 2006 6:22:53 GMT
Post by Jilli on Jul 29, 2006 6:22:53 GMT
I found these 2 pictures on 60IF web site for ear comparison: Paul's ear...............................................................................................................Faul's ear you cant tell me those are the same ears hahahaha
|
|
lazur
Welcome new member
Posts: 8
|
Ear.
Oct 27, 2006 11:11:51 GMT
Post by lazur on Oct 27, 2006 11:11:51 GMT
Billy's 'original' ear connected to the jaw in a down-slope, ie, no hint of a lobe. Paul's connects in a horizontal line, looking like a lobe to a casual gaze, but of course, not one. Faul's ear has a full lobe. They appear to me to be three different people.
|
|
lazur
Welcome new member
Posts: 8
|
Ear.
Oct 27, 2006 11:12:41 GMT
Post by lazur on Oct 27, 2006 11:12:41 GMT
Or more, of course.
|
|
phoenix
Welcome new member
"I replaced Jerri Willmore!"
Posts: 6
|
Ear.
Nov 3, 2008 23:31:16 GMT
Post by phoenix on Nov 3, 2008 23:31:16 GMT
Could someone please please please tell me where the first picture came from? Thank you!
|
|
|
Ear.
Mar 1, 2010 15:04:53 GMT
Post by Gene Genie on Mar 1, 2010 15:04:53 GMT
I have to say - I've got a problem with this image: Especially when compared with this: Having said that I'm not a big fan of fades. You can make anyone fade into anyone given a bit of manipulation but to me these look remarkably like the same man? Ok the ear drops a little but couldn't that be due to the cameras lens? The 'missing piece of ear' looks like it's just the position of the hairs? Reassurance needed! GG
|
|
|
Ear.
Mar 2, 2010 14:02:49 GMT
Post by Sun King™ on Mar 2, 2010 14:02:49 GMT
I have to say - I've got a problem with this image: Especially when compared with this: Having said that I'm not a big fan of fades. You can make anyone fade into anyone given a bit of manipulation but to me these look remarkably like the same man? Ok the ear drops a little but couldn't that be due to the cameras lens? The 'missing piece of ear' looks like it's just the position of the hairs? Reassurance needed! GG Where is the "problem" when everything changes?
|
|
|
Ear.
Mar 2, 2010 17:58:32 GMT
Post by daveyo on Mar 2, 2010 17:58:32 GMT
Sun King
If you get and take that pic I posted of the Real Pauls Father why don't you take the Real Paul and compare his to his dad and show it to everyone that the Father and Son have the same style ears.
This would put to rest on this point and now take the Fauls ear and show us that difference.
In other words, the real pauls ear, the fathers ear and then the fauls ear. This way everyone can see for themselves.
Give it a shot and I would like to see this myself. Hard to do when you have two pics and they are not close enough etc.
I would appreciate it.
Daveyo
|
|
|
Ear.
Mar 4, 2010 19:20:20 GMT
Post by Gene Genie on Mar 4, 2010 19:20:20 GMT
So where are the differences? I'm having trouble seeing anything that really stands out as being more than camera distance/lens distortion.
Don't get me wrong I'm a strong believer in Paul's replacement just having trouble here. Maybe I should lay off the fades? I told you I don't like them!
|
|
|
Ear.
Mar 5, 2010 6:36:05 GMT
Post by daveyo on Mar 5, 2010 6:36:05 GMT
It is the way the shape is the style is and how the ear connects to the skull itself. This is where you will see the differences. For the most part the ears of the kids in relation to the parents remains mostly the same with hardly any change or difference. This is the actual genetic traits passed down from parent to children. When you compare the Ear from the real Pauls Father to the Real Paul himself you will see them being almost exactly the same except for the slight change due to aging. When you look at the Faul, it is completely different and does not match but if you look at his mother with Faul, you will see the almost same match, which means that woman is Fauls mother. I hope this explains it a lot, and this is one of the means of tools today that they use for identification & verification purposes.
The only time when a face and the ears and the bone structures are identical between two people is like identical twins or identical triplets or identical Quads. And this does not happen very often either.
So with this in mind, we do know that the Real Paul does not have a identical twin with absolute certainity.
Daveyo
|
|
|
Ear.
Mar 5, 2010 6:45:03 GMT
Post by daveyo on Mar 5, 2010 6:45:03 GMT
One last thing, keep in mind back in the 60's they never expected or knew about the kinds of technology we have today to match up a persons identity. Mostly back then it was fingerprints. Today we have the eyes, the ears, and the palms itself, voice imprints and the bone structures to see if they are one and the same identical person in question. We also have today DNA which for the most part is 99% accurate to identify someone precisely or the family line etc.
All this above is more than enough to get the Faul in super big trouble. All it takes is just one person or two to get the wheels rolling and bam it will all come down so fast on Faul, and anyone else who covered the caper for so long exposing who they are etc., it will be one very huge mess and of course the multi- millions that will be involved too.
This prediction is soon going to happen and its just a matter of time of when it starts.
Example it took over 20 years for the scientists to finally come to the agreement that a huge asteroid at the Chix area is the one causing the K-T event which doomed the Dinosaurs into extinction.
In a way I don't think it was only the asteroid. I think the impact also triggered Tsunamis, and also triggered a large amount of volcanic activity and earthquakes to happen which when all when put together yes, it can cause a mass extinction of species because all this affects not only on the ground but the atmosphere as well.
So the same thing will happen about the Faul, and there will be a very huge debate among many people even scientists to verify the actual true identity of Faul provided he himself is not cremated which so far all of the Beatles have done to datewith the exception of the Real Paul Himself because he was never cremated but buried and hidden from the public all these years. This verification will happen but us today will all be dead so we will never know the true answer when that time comes.
Daveyo
|
|
|
Ear.
Mar 6, 2010 5:05:55 GMT
Post by Sun King™ on Mar 6, 2010 5:05:55 GMT
So where are the differences? I'm having trouble seeing anything that really stands out as being more than camera distance/lens distortion. Don't get me wrong I'm a strong believer in Paul's replacement just having trouble here. Maybe I should lay off the fades? I told you I don't like them! I like to do comparison with images I know their origin like those above.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Ear.
Dec 22, 2011 23:44:01 GMT
Post by Deleted on Dec 22, 2011 23:44:01 GMT
/
|
|