And let me also add: People try to read more into something than they should. I am surprised that so far nobody has discovered the cure for cancer in one of those songs by playing it backwards.
Well if it was, "Paul has a cake" or "have a nice day" I would agee with you random chance.
But It's been "Paul is dead" and other clues of Paul's death. Clues in photos and songs, on 1 and I mean 1
subject The Death Of The REAL Paul McCartney !
Now please run along a mess with the other nice folks on the net. ;D
Well, maybe John and Co. left clues in a certain obscure way because they were intended to reach only a select audience.
Like, people who might be LOOKING for clues----because they had a reason to look. Maybe because they were nervous for some reason.
Let's say some fiends decided, for whatever twisted *ssh*le reason, to do something harmful to a certain famous rock and roll band from England. Maybe they were fanatics who had some political or philisophical problem with this band.
Maybe they attacked them viciously in some city.
Maybe they injured or killed a member, but didn't know the outcome.
Weeks pass. The guilty know they have had a harmful effect, but they don't know how harmful.
Yet, in the news, everywhere, reports, as far as they can tell, this rock band is perfectly allright and no harm was done.
Now, they are confused. They know they instigated something, and they know that somebody was at least badly hurt.
Yet no news.
What gives.
Have they gotten away with it?
When will the other shoe drop.?
Time goes on and on and nothing happens.
In time, these perpetrators are watching TV and even see the band emerge on camera, fine, alive, perfectly healthy. What happenned? How could this be?
They get nervous. There is no sense or logic to this. This must be a ruse of some sort. Why are they doing this?
The criminals start watching this band, paying attention to every little thing they put out, checking to see what the deal is...soon, they notice winks, comments, little things that seem to speak to their guilty conscience.
They begin to freak out, to panic. Other people of their "ilk" put two and two together and it becomes apparent that they could be double crossed by their cronies. Or, are they in fact, already under suspician and being watched by authorities?
Maybe they belong to some racist or ultra-mean "religious" group. Maybe, in fact, these persons of dark hate have practiced their dirty doings more than one time.
Maybe these nit-wit bone head haters finally got caught. Or, maybe just some of them, but not all, have been brought to some kind of justice.
Maybe the clues were aimed at smoking out the guilty. Maybe some of the chosen clues were purposely designed to be misleading, intending to bring the wicked varmints to confusion and maybe force them out in the open.
Probably not. It occurred to me long ago that presenting an appearance of no changes might have been designed for this; but the idea that the clues might have been cleverly put in as crime enforcement is a new thought.
It would well motivate people to participate. If a good friend of yours was vicitmized, and the police told you to do (A), (B), and (C), as a method of apprehending the goons, even though it was tough, if you loved the vicitmized friend, you would do all that was asked with enthusiasm.
Meaning, the clues MAY not have been all put in by John or the boys.
There may have been a specialist, a professional, overseeing the album production, etc, almost as if it were all part of a case. A man who becomes part of the face of Apple. But part of something else as well. A compassionate man, part detective/part producer. An unusual combo.
I have no idea who that associate planner could be in all this.
An unusual case of where law enforcement and the entertainment industry
interface--for a common cause.
That is wild speculation on my part. just looking one more of the many facets of the dodecahedronal prism that PID/PWR/PIA? has become. OK, I don't really know what that looks like; I only know there are 12 of something there.
Maybe it was something else altogether. The 1968 Apple interview in NYC by Jerry What'shisname was revelatory to me. At least, I took it that way. There was a definite sparkle, a commitment, something positive, in the undercurrent of both John and William's persona's that I really believe that they were saying, "Thing's are going to be allright/we're taking care of things/trust us though there is some confusion out there/everything will be worked out." John and Bill had great rapport; you'd think it was JPM with John from the banter and so forth. Hmmm....not to say the John and William lacked rapport----far from it---but maybe a rapport formed under a different, unusual basis. Rapport is good where-ever and however you find it. Rapport is a funny thing; you can feel it in vibes and intangible hunches.
You can almost sense it on the internet. But let's not be crazy.
But back to the point: It begs the question, might there remain any unfinished business in this saga if my theory holds?
[cue soap opera organ music, B-3, light leslie, mixed diapasons and an 8' tibia, pedals on bourbon 16', playing a juicy, lush version of "I Believe" in Andrew Lloyd-Webber's favorite ballad key of Dbmajor]
Tune in tomorrow, and the next day and the next day, to find out if Mary forgives John, if Aunt Zelda takes her doctor's advice, and if Perplexed learns how to finish a post in less than 500 words OR only 3 paragraph breaks and no repeating periods.....................'cause apparently it ain't today..........
......or using the words "well", "even", "just", "seems", and "really" in every sentence.
Til I found this,
Til I found this,
