|
|
Post by Chris on Aug 23, 2003 21:38:58 GMT
 Hear, hear !!! I agree 100% with Andy & S.K. !!! All we need is love & THE TRUTH !!!!! Chris 
|
|
|
|
Post by Revolver on Aug 24, 2003 5:01:09 GMT
What would Paul look like today? Not like the 71 yr old butoxin fallen magneto & titantium man we see today, thas is for sure...
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Aug 24, 2003 11:16:03 GMT
;D Very true Revolver. That man should be ASHAMED of himself... All we need is love & THE TRUTH... Chris |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 24, 2003 12:17:31 GMT
...image loading...please wait... Faul before THE LAST plastic surgery retouch
[glow=red,2,300]NO COMMENT[/glow] |
|
|
|
Post by Provincial on Sept 2, 2003 12:47:18 GMT
Great point Paul Bearer. While searching the internet I came across this supposed 1964 picture of Paul www.imdb.com/gallery/ss/0058182/Ss/0058182/1-3.jpg?path=gallery&path_key=0058182 from the movie: A Hard Day's Night. Notice the close resemblance to "Faul" & the make-up. He certainly does not look like a 22 year old (which is how old Paul was in 1964), he seems to look quite a bit older. Yet on the SAME SITE: one will find www.imdb.com/gallery/ss/0058182/Ss/0058182/dbscan220.jpg?path=gallery&path_key=0058182 This picture of the "real" Paul. I found this quite interesting. Does anyone else agree with my observations & analysis? It certainly is true that there appears to be a number of doctored & altered pictures of Paul from the pre 1967 era which obscure his true appearance. The example I linked to appears rather obvious too. |
|
|
|
Post by Provincial on Sept 2, 2003 13:11:58 GMT
Thanks for posting the pictures I linked to xpt626.
That side by side comparison is certainly quite striking.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Sept 2, 2003 13:14:36 GMT
The first one is doctored  |
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Sept 2, 2003 13:17:27 GMT
You're right xpt Oh sorry!!!! Welcome Provincial!!!!! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Provincial on Sept 2, 2003 13:20:58 GMT
I was suprized indeed. Considering that the rest of the site appears to have numberous pictures (from A Hard Day's Night) of the original Paul.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Sept 2, 2003 13:22:50 GMT
You will always be surprised here!!! ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Provincial on Sept 2, 2003 14:14:38 GMT
Just a quick response to Beatlestobattle:
the conspiracy theorist of...
Well reflexively dismissing any possibility of a conspiracy is just as foolish as blindly accepting a given one. Though I would point out that it is certainly more foolish & even dangerous to be complacent in the face of compelling evidence.
This picture was NOT in any way tampered with.
How can you be certain of this? This is an assertion on your part.
And it still looked like "Faul." He got thinner, the eyes came closer together,
That is an absolute joke! It is impossible for anyone's eyes to get closer together since the skull retains the same shape throughout one's life. Regardless of weight gain or loss. The skull is solid BONE. Even if one were to be in an accident in which one's skull is crushed & (for the sake of argument) the eyes were to be closer together: the individual would have a difficult time seeing much of anything in that state! Good grief. This is quite an argument in logical gymnastics that you (Beatlestobattle) are asserting here. At any rate: Uberkinder has allready made excellent points regarding this matter.
he looked two or so feet taller when I stuck the head on a Paul body.
Two feet taller?! A Rather disproportianate head wouldn't you say?
In fact, it was an almost perfect match.
& you say it's a perfect match? Your bizarre argument is only helping to bolster the points raised on this site.
Now it is one thing to argue the acuracy of the pictures themselves, but to make the ridiculous & bizarre claim that one's eyes can somehow get closer together is nothing short of dellusional.
|
|
|
|
Post by Provincial on Sept 2, 2003 14:22:51 GMT
Thanks for the wellcomes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Sept 3, 2003 1:02:13 GMT
;D Nicely worded Provincial !!! Welcome to my little piece of heaven... I am totally dedicated to seeing that James Paul gets his due. That Faul gives back to Paul what is rightfully his !!!  All we need is LOVE & THE TRUTH !!!! Chris  |
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Sept 3, 2003 2:44:55 GMT
Don't worry Provincial. Beatlestobattle has had a complete change of heart since that post. He now goes under the name ImGonnaOpenMyMind and he supports us!
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 3, 2003 10:15:21 GMT
A LEGAL reference about James Paul's TRUE look. Taken from "THE BEATLES PERSONALITY ANNUAL" 1965 directly by XPT626 |
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Sept 21, 2003 20:49:56 GMT
this is a Great idea. i dont think we should give up on it. we should persue this and find what he would look like today, and also it would be interesting to find what the picture of bill would look like time-enhanced, but i dont know if that could be as easily done, of course.
|
|
|
|
Post by MrMustard on Sept 22, 2003 10:33:43 GMT
Definitely!!!!! ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Sept 28, 2003 7:45:54 GMT
From the above photos, it appears, that Paul, in profile, had a "helmet" head. His head was like a round cantaloupe, haircut or not.
New Paul has a longer head, than seems to be flat. The back of the cranium seems to be flatter, straighter down from the top of the head down to the neck.
|
|
|
|
Post by ZioMarco on Sept 30, 2003 14:57:05 GMT
Maybe like:  It's Renato Pozzetto, an italian actor. He is a "natural" (without plastic surgery) Faul. He is about 60 (just like James Paul "IF") Hey SK, imagine James Paul singing "La vita l'รจ bela" or "La gallina". it's very amusing. |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 30, 2003 15:39:57 GMT
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
...but his face features match very well with the original James Paul's so...
|
|
|
|
Post by ZioMarco on Sept 30, 2003 15:48:15 GMT
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ...but his face features match very well with the original James Paul's so... Perharps we can try to realize an animation.  But i doubt about results. |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 30, 2003 15:55:02 GMT
Already done! Soon I'll show you it. The result: very very good. You see Renato has the "proper" eyes distance. Only the nose changes! Really the best for "aging" recontruction... |
|
|
|
Post by ZioMarco on Sept 30, 2003 16:43:03 GMT
Maybe Renato could be a great sponsor for 60IF.
someone should inform him about.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheeCavendeshLane on Oct 5, 2003 1:29:18 GMT
Buffoon Paul started getting those lines along the contour at the
tops of his phony cheeks almost immediately after they were created
because it was too much for his skin to bear--the real Paul had no hint of any such lines there. Yeah this Italian guy makes a good older
Paul.
|
|
|
|
Post by fixingahole on Jan 5, 2004 0:14:56 GMT
SK, surely you are not suggesting that the picture posted above is the "real Paul."
Or are you?
|
|
