|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 14, 2004 19:37:19 GMT
Posted by: Sun King Posted on: Today at 2:28pm
The fifth one: James Paul's a bit doctored
Ok I'll replace that one as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Jun 14, 2004 21:26:29 GMT
Thanks. I guess it might've been doctored. S.K. would know. I like the photo you replaced it with. Thanks again ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Jun 14, 2004 23:41:31 GMT
I hadn't seen that first photo before and I just love it. Paul's sooo pretty! Note that his eye color is definitely medium brown for future reference since there seems to be some controversy about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jun 16, 2004 14:29:44 GMT
Yes, that first picture is very adorable and shows those beautiful eyes to definitely be brown
Good pictures, Red Lion. Paul was such a handsome, gentle man.
|
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Jun 17, 2004 3:39:38 GMT
These are wonderful photos. Thank you Red Lion.
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 17, 2004 4:46:28 GMT
My pleasure. Heres 2 more.   |
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 17, 2004 6:54:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Jun 17, 2004 14:35:40 GMT
Thanks so much, Red Lion ! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 17, 2004 16:11:18 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Jun 17, 2004 17:47:27 GMT
Thank you.  |
|
|
|
Post by MMCDHoward on Jun 17, 2004 22:28:11 GMT
 is it just me or is his face getting a little long? what year is this pic? anyone know? |
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 17, 2004 23:26:44 GMT
That picture is 65/66 not sure. The face is very round and JPish. JP Faul  A resemblance? Yes. A match?.............I say no way. But you decide.  JP  Faul  |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Jun 18, 2004 9:10:13 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 18, 2004 9:45:28 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Jun 18, 2004 10:26:46 GMT
To know what was James Paul McCartney's TRUE look. |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jun 18, 2004 14:17:20 GMT
HAPPY BIRTHDAY, PAUL!!!!  He should be 62 today. Wherever James Paul is, I hope he knows we are trying our d*mnedest to right a horrible injustice. WE LOVE YOU, PAUL! |
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Jun 18, 2004 14:43:40 GMT
Same here ABBEY - Happy "62nd" Birthday James Paul. We love and miss you ! Red Lion - I agree with you about those photos. They resemble each other, but are NOT the same man! About what S.K. is saying - the vintage documentation is pure gold in this matter. Those old magazines have photos that haven't been touched. His gallery of photos are taken from ONLY vintage magazines &/or books. We appreciate EVERYTHING that you are doing Red Lion. Thank you!!! Thank you also, S.K. for ALL of your hard work the past 2 years! |
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Jun 18, 2004 16:46:24 GMT
62IF now. How time flies...
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 18, 2004 18:27:09 GMT
Exactly which photo does not show his TRUE look? I guess it must have been all of them. It's good to know that you have the only pictures of JP that still show what he really looked like. Your VINTAGE GALLERY of 8 photos is very impressive. Sorry to have wasted everyone's time with pics that didn't show JP's TRUE look. And thank you SK as you have saved me time and energy for not having to post additional photos in the future. It is a shame though for those who really enjoyed them as I still have lots that I have not posted.
Peace to all, Red Lion
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Jun 18, 2004 19:51:59 GMT
62IF now. How time flies... Happy Birthday James Paul McCartney Now all we know that you were The Greatest Genius of 20th century music...forever... |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Jun 18, 2004 19:55:27 GMT
Exactly which photo does not show his TRUE look? I guess it must have been all of them. It's good to know that you have the only pictures of JP that still show what he really looked like. Your VINTAGE GALLERY of 8 photos is very impressive. Sorry to have wasted everyone's time with pics that didn't show JP's TRUE look. And thank you SK as you have saved me time and energy for not having to post additional photos in the future. It is a shame though for those who really enjoyed them as I still have lots that I have not posted. Peace to all, Red Lion Sorry I don't know the reason of your reaction..... The problem is (as always) that the pictures taken from the Internet are quite all tampeed...except those from the vintage documents... |
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Jun 19, 2004 6:16:33 GMT
Please don't be offended Red Lion. Many of those photos were undoubtedly him, particularly the more well-known and popular ones that they wouldn't dare change (eg: album covers). However, many have been tampered with to look like Faul. It's been many years now and most people no longer remember the real Paul.
Vintage documentation means alot more than 8 photos. It means geniune magazine photos etc printed prior to the last quarter of '66. If you go to your local library and look up old newspapers, for instance, you will see the real Paul. The truth is in the hands of the fans - original material prior to the end of '66.
|
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Jun 19, 2004 14:08:47 GMT
PLEASE - don't stop posting photos! They are so important if we're ever going to prove our case  |
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Jun 19, 2004 16:00:21 GMT
I'm with Billy. Please keep posting Red Lion.
|
|
|
|
Post by lorraine on Jun 19, 2004 17:48:20 GMT
Most beautiful of the guys Paul!!!!!!!!! ;D[glow=red,2,300]TEXT[/glow] |
|
He should be 62 today. Wherever James Paul is, I hope he knows we are trying our d*mnedest to right a horrible injustice.
