|
Post by fauLLIBle on Mar 21, 2008 4:07:44 GMT
Hey Eric, wow I did not know you had ever posted in here. Your work on the moon landing is some of the best I've seen. I've been meaning to go check out what the latest on Christopher was. Anywaze, nice to meet you and hope to hear from you soon in here.
|
|
|
Post by yahpete on Dec 7, 2009 12:50:55 GMT
Paul most likely had makeup applied to his face in the early days along with eyeliner and eyelash thickner. Eyebrows could be thickened. I remember seeing a press release of John Lennon with obvious lipstick applied. The early beatles were prettied up for their wholesum image. Beatle Pauls image even shows him with having blue eyes. Easy peasy. Gentlemen and ladies and their leather handbags, you need dental comparisons and DNA comparisons to prove that someone is a fake. Images are useless.
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Dec 8, 2009 8:55:44 GMT
Paul most likely had makeup applied to his face in the early days along with eyeliner and eyelash thickner. Eyebrows could be thickened. I remember seeing a press release of John Lennon with obvious lipstick applied. The early beatles were prettied up for their wholesum image. Beatle Pauls image even shows him with having blue eyes. Easy peasy. Gentlemen and ladies and their leather handbags, you need dental comparisons and DNA comparisons to prove that someone is a fake. Images are useless. Dear update your knowledge: www.cognitec-systems.de/documentation/frsdk_public/index.html"... our experts have been developing face recognition technology that allows industry and governmental customers to prevent identity fraud ..."
|
|
|
Post by daveyo on Mar 12, 2010 18:12:26 GMT
Hi Sun King and everybody
Tonight I have been able to examine the Get Back video in 1969 when the Beatles did the roof top concert performed by the alleged Paul, it is definitely not the Real Paul besides the vocal analysis etc. It was the Faul that is playing then and also at present time.
It was hard to get the right spot, of the entire ear comparison between the Real Paul and the Faul. Now I am sure sure and 99.9% positive. The 1966 and the 1969 shindig is defintely two different people without a doubt. I had a slight doubt because only the vocals were checked, so I wanted to be sure for myself.
This pretty much itself proves something definitely happened to the real Paul back in 1966 and I can write off 1969.
I simply have a feeling and can almost say with a high degree of certainity that any music coming out from 1967 onward is all FAUL with a few possible exceptions in the first 3 months of that year as they were producing their Albums. So, I would think if you got any videos or pics or genuine music up to 1966, this will be the real Gold worth a lot of money. Anything after this point it except the first 3 months of 67 is worthless. The singles by John and by George and by Ringo are worth the gold. Anything from the Faul perhaps it is worthless but it will hold some value because that is all music made from a FRAUD and a Con Artist who fooled many people all these years.
Since the Jacksons hold 50% of the catalogs and Sony Corporation owns the other 50% I can just imagine the fallout when it all gets revealed. Whoever owns up to 1966 is the one who will come out ahead in the deal and whoever owns after this will go broke!!!
Just like the people who went after all the MJ memorabilia and his past records and songs as they snatched it up, i would think the same will be when everybody will go for all the music up to 66 of the Beatles!!! If they sell the actual videos of them playing in concerts it will indeed become very expensive as they will obviously try to reap up as much as they can financially. What they do with Faul and the Billion Dollars in his piggy bank remains to be seen because all of that was obtained by means of do we call FRAUD?
Has anyone ever seen in their lifetime the fastest rise and fall of a Billionaire to becoming virtually broke almost overnight?? It will definitely be the first for me should this ever take place.
Daveyo
|
|