|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 25, 2005 17:23:22 GMT
Thank you, B.P. That photo is sweet  |
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Jul 13, 2005 14:26:11 GMT
bumpidy bumpidy bumpidy bumpidy bumpidy bumpidy bumpidy bump!
|
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Jul 13, 2005 14:29:26 GMT
![]() http://*banned link*/Shoebox/miscstills/Morehelp/PDVD_013.jpg [/img] ![]() http://*banned link*/Shoebox/miscstills/Morehelp/PDVD_014.jpg[/img] [/quote] The magic vegitation, and of course, John always has to stick in another clue for us all! BTW this has been brought up 1,000,000,000 times, but is the 1987 video release of Help! any less doctored? Because I know a video rental place that has it. |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Jul 13, 2005 15:11:50 GMT
This is just the "saddest side" of all this matter...  |
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Jul 13, 2005 16:05:57 GMT
what's that supposed to be showing?
|
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on Jul 13, 2005 16:28:46 GMT
Their crotch has been doctored? Paint it black? I don't see anything unusual. I see that every day.
|
|
|
|
Post by defhermit on Jul 13, 2005 19:36:05 GMT
is everyone here obsessed with genitalia?
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Aug 2, 2005 16:35:37 GMT
I just found this comparison:   THIS IS SO WEIRD. IT LOOKS LIKE PAUL HAS GROWN 4 - 6 INCHES & HIS LEGS HAVE BECOME LONGER. THE ONLY EXPLANATION I HAVE IS THAT IN THE SECOND PHOTO IT'S NOT PAUL, BUT BILL ! Concerning the photo of Paul & George with their crotches circled, SO WHAT. So Paul had a small weenie. It wasn't his fault, he was born that way  Just because he had a small weenie doesn't make him a girl, nor does it make him gay You're right defhermit. We need to get OFF the weenie train ;D |
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on Aug 2, 2005 17:48:19 GMT
Remember, they are on the beach and there could be pits and stuff or piles of sand. "Paul" looks like Paul, not Faul.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Aug 2, 2005 19:19:49 GMT
That's true. It does appear to be Paul. His shoulders were narrower than Bill's are. It's just that there was some concern that they had inserted photos of Bill with the others in with the photos of Paul & them. From the Help! photo sessions of course. All I can say is I hope that you're correct & it is Paul in that second photo |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Aug 2, 2005 20:28:28 GMT
I just found this comparison: THIS IS SO WEIRD. IT LOOKS LIKE PAUL HAS GROWN 4 - 6 INCHES & HIS LEGS HAVE BECOME LONGER. THE ONLY EXPLANATION I HAVE IS THAT IN THE SECOND PHOTO IT'S NOT PAUL, BUT BILL ! Concerning the photo of Paul & George with their crotches circled, SO WHAT. So Paul had a small weenie. It wasn't his fault, he was born that way Just because he had a small weenie doesn't make him a girl, nor does it make him gay You're right defhermit. We need to get OFF the weenie train ;D SMA note is good but it looks as Paul in both picture. The one on the left is a vintage document (so it's reliable) the one on the right is a frame from Help! the film that we all know it was heavly doctored. This is the explanation for the differences. |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Aug 3, 2005 15:18:08 GMT
BP, I agree. In fact, if you take the second photo & put in on Corel photo paint, you can see that the pixels in Paul are different than the ones in the other boys. Paul has been doctored. Looking at it again, it looks like he's been stretched. Does that make sense  |
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on Aug 3, 2005 15:21:05 GMT
Ringo also appears larger in the second pic.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Aug 3, 2005 15:28:23 GMT
That could be because he's closer to the camera in the second shot.
|
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Aug 3, 2005 16:04:28 GMT
oh and look at the horizon... It's tilted!
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Aug 3, 2005 17:02:53 GMT
RRD, that's true. I didn't even realize that !  |
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Aug 3, 2005 22:55:38 GMT
but tilted in a way that would make paul appear taller, not as in Your Mother Should Know, which was clearly to compensation and make the others appear taller, so bill WAS taller!!! OMG as if we didnt know, how can PIAers possibly discount this blatant evidence!?
|
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Aug 4, 2005 3:15:31 GMT
 in this fine piece of work, I rotated the picture back to leval, doctored out Paul, and stuck him back in vertically squished, so he is the same height (actually, slightly smaller) than John and George. Notice how his proportions are back, comparing to the second picture! (sorry about the red line, I was using it to make the horizon leval, and forgot to delete it ) |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Aug 4, 2005 14:51:32 GMT
Great work, RRD. Thank you ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by The Taxman on Aug 7, 2005 20:56:52 GMT
I agree...most excellent work...brings things even closer.
|
|
Dr.No
Contributor
Posts: 177
|
Post by Dr.No on Aug 8, 2005 0:04:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on Aug 11, 2005 9:08:07 GMT
Here's a photo from clearly the same shoot.  But why does he still look big now? Hi heel shoes (and a low neck sweater ;D)? |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Aug 17, 2005 19:23:39 GMT
Has to be those low neck sweaters.......  |
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Aug 17, 2005 22:51:13 GMT
So if JPM is wearing the "low neck sweater", you're gonna hate me sis (and i assume its been said before, but if not, im breakin new ground!) but if JPM is wearing that and if you are to be believed we know he had his "high heeled shoes", then surely he passes for loretta?
Why would they call "all man JPM" loretta? It begs the question surely...?
|
|
bxv
Contributor
Posts: 77
|
Post by bxv on Aug 30, 2005 21:00:35 GMT
HELP ![]() http://*banned link*/Shoebox/PBWStillsc/PB2.jpg[/img] Oh my god! I'm freaking out!  Highly speculative but is this a photograph of Paul in his car? Dead? Looking in throught the windscreen. Hint. Squint! |
|
