|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jun 10, 2005 3:38:40 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Jun 10, 2005 3:44:48 GMT
Is that yer name Dexelprep?
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jun 10, 2005 3:54:06 GMT
Is that yer name Dexelprep? no. |
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Jun 10, 2005 3:56:55 GMT
Oh. OK.
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jun 10, 2005 4:20:30 GMT
fool on the "hill"
?
|
|
Dr.No
Contributor
Posts: 177
|
Post by Dr.No on Jun 10, 2005 4:41:09 GMT
So Paul was a 'top'?  |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jun 16, 2005 14:06:17 GMT
Uh, did I miss something in this topic? The implication I got from the last post, "Paul was a 'top'", would imply Paul was gay?  ? Paul was never gay.....No way! There is nothing wrong with being gay, don't get me wrong, but Paul was not of that persuasion. |
|
|
|
Post by defhermit on Jun 16, 2005 17:27:23 GMT
I think it was a joke sister. Fool on the hill... if hill = Brian and Fool = Paul... Paul on the Brian... hence, Paul's a "top"... a joke....
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jun 17, 2005 13:47:33 GMT
Thanks, Defhermit. I thought I missed something as I haven't been able to be here as often as I'd like lately.
Although, taken as Faul being the fool as in MMT........ ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Jun 23, 2005 23:30:28 GMT
Let me state this in plain English:
We have no proof Faul swings for the pink team. All we have is speculation based on things any other star would do because "no publicity is bad publicity." So, PLEASE STOP BRINGING IT UP EVERY TIME YOU THINK IT'S WARRANTED! IT'S NOT!
|
|
Dr.No
Contributor
Posts: 177
|
Post by Dr.No on Jun 24, 2005 2:32:48 GMT
You need to lighten up PC. It was a joke. I write a lot of comedy and I can't help it if it leaks onto this forum. Also, there's no solid proof of a lot of things people are running away with on this forum..so go yell at them. that is all. wakka wakka.
|
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on Jun 24, 2005 8:49:32 GMT
Let me state this in plain English: We have no proof Faul swings for the pink team. All we have is speculation based on things any other star would do because "no publicity is bad publicity." So, PLEASE STOP BRINGING IT UP EVERY TIME YOU THINK IT'S WARRANTED! IT'S NOT! Ringo: Hey! Look at John, will ya! Faul: What's the matter John, love? Blue Meanies? |
|
Ludwig
Contributor
"It's all in the mind."
Posts: 101
|
Post by Ludwig on Jun 24, 2005 19:35:40 GMT
Yellow Submarine? I believe the line is "What's the matter fellas? Blue Meanies?" On the DVD at least.
|
|
Dr.No
Contributor
Posts: 177
|
Post by Dr.No on Jun 24, 2005 20:27:53 GMT
No, TPIMaster is correct.
|
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on Jun 26, 2005 18:42:06 GMT
Yellow Submarine? I believe the line is "What's the matter fellas? Blue Meanies?" On the DVD at least. That quote is in there aswell. That's when Paul comes out of that door. But the "What's the matter John, love? Blue Meanies?" Is before the clip of All Together Now, where you see the real Beatles. |
|
|
|
Post by beldabeast on Jun 29, 2005 15:01:27 GMT
Tara - from the Irish word "torra" meaning "rocky top".
|
|
|
|
Post by beldabeast on Jun 29, 2005 15:02:34 GMT
Maybe Fool on the Hill was about Brians replacement . |
|
|
|
Post by beldabeast on Jun 29, 2005 15:08:56 GMT
[
Ringo: Hey! Look at John, will ya!
Faul: What's the matter John, love? Blue Meanies?
<< Speaking of Blue meanies;
I had a dream that was like the first part of MMT
When the villages were enjoying a musicale in the park and the scene shifts to the meanies, and the head meany says what a great time they are having and he will soon put a stop to it , etc .
Then the witch in OZ does that " Poppies , I think !
Poppies will put them to sleep . " Nothing new ,maybe .
But very odd
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jul 2, 2005 18:42:58 GMT
Brian would have been a "bottom" ....not much of a 'hill' there  Johnny was totally alpha male and would be a top. Paul would have been outta there!!!!! As Tone Loc would say, "No plans with a man"; "No Oscar Meyer weiner" |
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Jul 4, 2005 15:08:20 GMT
My message was directed at Sister Mary Abbey. We have only speculation about John being gay or bi, and as for Faul being gay, we have no proof at all, beyond things that all stars will do whether it's against their principles or not because "no publicity is bad publicity."
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jul 4, 2005 19:03:15 GMT
John was bi and it has been documented. Back then it was a big deal and now it is common and no one would care. That was why his big macho image because being queer was actually illegal in Britain back then. John was bi-sexual. He damn near killed that guy at Paul's 21st birthday bash for making a comment about his vacation with Brian. And John really had done what the guy accused him of.
As for Bill, look at all those campy or feminine poses.....and there is even a picture somewhere with his wearing Linda's blouse. It is a disgrace when he represents JPM and acts like that! Paul would never have allowed some guy to sit on his lap....nor the poses you see of Bill and other men stars. Paul would have sh*t a brick!
Paul would have been happy as hell for less publicity in his private life and more private life to enjoy such things as getting a start on the Oriental garden he wanted to put in his backyard..........not the weed infested sh*thole that Bill let it become!
|
|
|
|
Post by defhermit on Jul 5, 2005 15:18:16 GMT
jeezus, not this shit again...
|
|
Dr.No
Contributor
Posts: 177
|
Post by Dr.No on Jul 6, 2005 11:00:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Jul 6, 2005 13:58:12 GMT
No flaming on this forum! ;D Inflammatory. |
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Jul 7, 2005 21:44:51 GMT
John was bi and it has been documented. Back then it was a big deal and now it is common and no one would care. That was why his big macho image because being queer was actually illegal in Britain back then. John was bi-sexual. He damn near killed that guy at Paul's 21st birthday bash for making a comment about his vacation with Brian. And John really had done what the guy accused him of. It has been documented by what. The only things I see that can constitute 'documented' are posts by that guy OpenMind on this board from books that amount to what attempt to be Kitty Kelley-style exposes and cannot be trusted for accuracy. He damn near killed that guy because, as he said when interviewed, "I was so high I didn't know what I was doing." He was drunk out of his skull. You know what brutal people like John was at the time do when they are drunk: if one wrong thing is said, they beat the ever-loving shit out of someone. And if you can prove that what the guy accused John of doing actually occurred beyond what basically amounts to fiction, tell me what it is and where to find it. John himself said that it was somewhat like a relationship during that Spanish interlude, but it was 'never consummated' -- in other words, they never did the dirty. As for Bill, look at all those campy or feminine poses.....and there is even a picture somewhere with his wearing Linda's blouse. It is a disgrace when he represents JPM and acts like that! Paul would never have allowed some guy to sit on his lap....nor the poses you see of Bill and other men stars. Paul would have sh*t a brick! So Bill poses campily. Look at the style of music he's often in for, the lighter, more romantic, Gershwin style, theatrical BS. I know a lot of people who pose in ways that can be considered campy or feminine, and they are as straight as the day comes. So he wore Linda's dresse once; judging by the way you describe his garden, I'm not surprised -- he was probably stoned out of his mind. And how do you know how Paul would or would not have felt? You don't know what some seemingly normal people do for publicity...just look at the "Jackass" film. Paul would have been happy as hell for less publicity in his private life and more private life to enjoy such things as getting a start on the Oriental garden he wanted to put in his backyard..........not the weed infested sh*thole that Bill let it become! How do you know what he wanted to do? It's not as if you had any personal connection to the man. It's not as if you knew him. And judging by the amounts of weed Paul has smoked over the years, I wouldn't be surprised if he grew that much weed. He and his wife were addicts. |
|
?
