|
|
Post by SunKing on Apr 23, 2004 19:56:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 23, 2004 21:13:32 GMT
Thanks S.K. VERY interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Apr 24, 2004 8:16:47 GMT
Thanks S.K. VERY interesting. ...and please pay attention to page 20...very revealing! Probably journalists knew always the truth! |
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Apr 24, 2004 9:48:24 GMT
The story was written in such a way as if it were true. It didn't say "if Paul was dead, this might have happened etc" but was written as fact. I wonder whether the journalists original intention was to expose Paul as really being dead but was then "instructed" that he couldn't do that, that it had to be seen as a hoax. Nevertheless, he decided not the change the words or sense of the original article (except perhaps "Campbell" and so on)...
|
|
Skydeli
Contributor
food for thought
Posts: 43
|
Post by Skydeli on Apr 24, 2004 14:49:51 GMT
That was really interesting! There are some good photos in it to examine as well..
|
|
|
|
Post by lorraine on Apr 24, 2004 17:34:49 GMT
.Is this somebody could help me to translate a passage in the text of the newspaper from: "it had only raining lightly when Paul... until A the fine bus one cannot copy the text to translate it by a translator of Internet!!! thank you  |
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Apr 24, 2004 22:29:07 GMT
.Is this somebody could help me to translate a passage in the text of the newspaper from: "it had only raining lightly when Paul... until A the fine bus one cannot copy the text to translate it by a translator of Internet!!! thank you quiche lorraine, please try coping the sentence you want again, and like, what language you want to see it in. |
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Apr 24, 2004 22:49:40 GMT
WHAT A FIND. Thank you jojo. wherever you are |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Apr 25, 2004 12:32:12 GMT
That was really interesting! There are some good photos in it to examine as well.. Exactly! If you look carefully, you'll notice that Faul's photos, taken during his marriage to Linda, are ALL genuine (Faul's long face is SO obvious). Those were always about Faul but those from "Apple corps" are all faked! Two perfectly different men. It seems like a "prehistorical" "60IF" comparison. But pretty soon "the King" was "restored"! Beware: the text contains some very interesting things: a mishmash of pure truth and "hoax bullish*t". Journalists (sadly) always took that "strategy" (to avoid any personal backlash). |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Apr 25, 2004 12:37:46 GMT
WHAT A FIND. Thank you jojo. wherever you are LUCY....so does that Internet provider work fine for your G3? Please reply......it's really important! |
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 25, 2004 13:20:24 GMT
I haven't had the time to read the text. I was under the impression that it was ALL bullshit!
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Apr 25, 2004 18:03:53 GMT
...and please pay attention to page 20...very revealing! Probably journalists knew always the truth! WOW! SK that's really fantastic and it makes perfect sense....it takes 3 guys to replace one James Paul McCartney. And John was the song writer which also makes logical sense because they had written soooo many songs together, who would know better about Paul's style??? Thank you Sun King! |
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Apr 25, 2004 22:34:20 GMT
THIS IS THE ONE THAT WORKS FOR me ;D |
|
|
|
Post by lorraine on Apr 26, 2004 11:14:10 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Apr 26, 2004 16:17:28 GMT
Poor Paul here are what is to want to render service!!!!  Ladies and gentlemans be wary of the car invisible menders!!!! Lorraine: alot of us here are multilingual. Please try your thoughts in your native tongue. |
|
bandi
Welcome new member
Posts: 7 
|
Post by bandi on May 22, 2016 4:51:45 GMT
12 years have passed since this magazine article was posted above. It's gone now--what did it say ? Anybody ?
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Bearer on Aug 2, 2016 17:29:18 GMT
I don't remember.
|
|
