James Paul / Faul height difference comparison

[SunKing]

...and




Please look at dimension difference not only at the height difference

[MMCDHoward]

This isn't new, you've had that posted elsewhere for months, it doesn't work, you can't see the feet, he could be wearing heels, his father could be in the old pic, sorry

[BillyJones]

Come on, WMWY - how many old men do you know who wear heels??? Give it a rest already. Are you being paid by Faul to disrupt this forum. That's all you're doing here

[MMCDHoward]

I'm not saying high heels, I happen to know grown men of all ages who have a good inch added to their height by heels, and if he's too old (stupid arguement anyway) then Paul could be wearing heels in one, there are pics in the past of the other Beatles wearing heels, such as:http://www.tlc=trolls ludicrous crapgraphic.com/images/MeetBeatlesBack.gif[/img]
Now Chris, I'm sorry, Billy Jay, can you come up with a better one?

[devilsadv]

Come on. It's not just the shoes. You can not see the ground they are standing on. The ground may not be even; there may be steps. Without being able to see the legs, feet or ground, such comparisons are WORTHLESS!

By the way, I have different shoes with different heal sizes. A couple, hiking shoes, have quite high heals.

P.S. - Look at the one where you can see they are standing in grass. Pauls feet are hidden behind grass. He could be standing in a hole or little dip. That's why you can't compare.

[MMCDHoward]

devilsadv said:

Come on. It's not just the shoes. You can not see the ground they are standing on. The ground may not be even; there may be steps. Without being able to see the legs, feet or ground, such comparisons are WORTHLESS!

By the way, I have different shoes with different heal sizes. A couple, hiking shoes, have quite high heals.

P.S. - Look at the one where you can see they are standing in grass. Pauls feet are hidden behind grass. He could be standing in a hole or little dip. That's why you can't compare.

That was my point when this was originally posted a long while back, its nice to see I'm not the only one here with eyes!

[BillyJones]

As far as I can see, the photo of PAUL with his dad, the ground looks even to me. Many photos of Faul with Linda, he's about 1/2 head taller than her. That's how much taller he is than her in the photo with her in it. He's also about that much taller than Jim McCartney in that same photo .
Devil's Advo. - this is NOT easy to prove. We are doing the best that we can with what we have.
WMWY - OKAY - you got me. I'm Chris. What are you gonna do about it. Are you going to slander me like the rest of your buddies at NIR?
Anyone who knew me before January, knows that I NEVER EVER did or said anything bad to anyone here. I was attacked to bring down S.K. ! There was NO OTHER LOGICAL REASON FOR IT
BTW - the photo WMWY used was purposely set up to make Paul look taller. He's not wearing any heels. He probably asked to be put in the foreground to look taller.
That's just my take on it.

[abbey]

WMWY - You'd have better eyesight, if you got your head out of Faul's lap ;D

[devilsadv]

The only place I can see the ground is where Paul is standing and it looks as if he is in a low spot. You can't see the ground where the others are standing, so it may be higher, or there may be a rock there. Who knows, but that's the point. You can't tell.

No, it ain't easy to prove, but this shouldn't be pawned off as any kind of proof.

[devilsadv]

ABBEY said:

WMWY - You'd have better eyesight, if you got your head out of Faul's lap ;D

Boy, that really raises the level of discourse .

[BillyJones]

That was the ONLY photo I have been able to find to date, of Paul with his dad. I am ALWAYS on the lookout for more photos. As soon as I find another one, BELIEVE ME, it will be posted on this forum. I may not have any proof, but I'm pretty sure that Paul was not too much taller than his father. Faul, on the other hand, had at least 4 inches on Jim McCartney. Since Jim McCartney died in 1974, we can't compare them any longer
Just FYI - Faul was on tour when Jim died & couldn't find the time to go to his funeral. I don't know about you, but if MY dad died, I would've made it my business to go to his funeral. That just makes me more suspicious than ever, concerning Faul's TRUE identity!

[abbey]

Jim probably died from complications after his visit to the farm in Scotland. Linda made Jim & Angie sleep on a mattress in one of the outbuildings. There was no heat. She also would not allow them to cook in her kitchen because they ate meat
She ordered her food from a specialty house in London that came in by rail. Jim & Angie had to go into the local town to purchase their own food.

[MMCDHoward]

Billy said:

As far as I can see, the photo of PAUL with his dad, the ground looks even to me. Many photos of Faul with Linda, he's about 1/2 head taller than her. That's how much taller he is than her in the photo with her in it. He's also about that much taller than Jim McCartney in that same photo .
Devil's Advo. - this is NOT easy to prove. We are doing the best that we can with what we have.
WMWY - OKAY - you got me. I'm Chris. What are you gonna do about it. Are you going to slander me like the rest of your buddies at NIR?
Anyone who knew me before January, knows that I NEVER EVER did or said anything bad to anyone here. I was attacked to bring down S.K. ! There was NO OTHER LOGICAL REASON FOR IT
BTW - the photo WMWY used was purposely set up to make Paul look taller. He's not wearing any heels. He probably asked to be put in the foreground to look taller.
That's just my take on it.

Tch. Why would I waste my time slandering you? The fact that you admit to your identity would do loads more than I could, my focus would be on the big guys at the top, and even then I don't say things that aren't true. At least not intentionally, if Paul really did die than I guess I'm saying something not true, but thats a big if...now, maybe you'd like to admit some of your other identities? I know of a few, and if you don't want to admit to them then maybe I should, at least admit who you are on the other forums, even if you wish to remain unknown here.

[BillyJones]

Aren't you paying attention. I just admitted my identity here. The only reason I was posting under Billy Jay, was so that I would be taken seriously here.
WHAT other identities? ABBEY & I were on NIR for a short time. I just wanted to see if I was still being slandered by those people. I really didn't post much of anything there. Jonna attacked me as soon as she could. I don't know why. I never did anything to any of those people. They were the ones who slandered me. Anyway, I don't belong to that board anylonger. They outed ABBEY & myself, even though we hadn't posted anything to upset anyone. They just didn't want us there.
I belonged to Macca4Ever for a short period. I just couldn't stomach the stuff being said about us, so I left. I don't understand WHY you find what I have been doing so interesting. I haven't been following what YOU have been doing on other boards. WHY am I so important to you? Why is it anyone's business where I'm posting? How DARE you threaten to tell people who I am on other boards. Who the hell do you think you are.
Who are you really? And why is the Paul/ Faul subject so important to YOU

[MMCDHoward]

I've answered the question before, but heres a thought for you, is it possible you accusing me of being paid to disrupt you and I got defensive, I've never cared what you did, but when I found out who you were I knew two things, one:I could use it if I needed, which I didn't and two:It's pretty dishonest of you to go around acting like you're somebody you're not, if I posted under a different name (and I have) I get called out for it, but you get away with it. As for who I am, thats getting a bit personal, but I admit readily that I am arrogant, and I come across that way because it is what I am. While we're asking questions, do you have anymore you'd like to ask, as long as its not personal I will answer them without shame.

[danny2]

I'm new at this so bare with me while I give this a try...

Notice in this first photo how Paul doesn't appear to be much taller than Ringo.


In the second photo (above right) notice how wide Paul's nose is also.. (Down Right - Notice how that Paul appears to be struggling to reach the microphone.)




Now look at the height of Paul/Faul in later years....



http://members.aol.com:/twobeatlepauls/faul4.gif[/img]




Notice also that in the above left photo Paul/Faul is holding a cigarette in his right hand.

[MMCDHoward]

shall I tear them one by one or all at once? Lets start at the beginning:Paul is standing farther back than ringo, besides, its common knowledge even here that Ringo was shorter than Paul by a good inch or two, so that pic is wrong
can't see feet, can't see point

standing behind them in both photos, useless for height, not to mention you can't see their feet
they are standing on an uneven surface, slouched over

can't see feet

this picture was hard to figure out because Paul and Ringo blend together for me, but they are once again out of line

http://members.aol.com:/twobeatlepauls/faul4.gif[/img]
no feet
no feet, they were moving around in the film so there are also pics of Paul looking shorter than he is
no feet, standing out of line
You can't tell anything from that angle and Pauls shoes are covered
John's bent over, Paul is closer to the camera

[MMCDHoward]

I would like to add that I appreciate you posting all these pics, and I understand n00bism (as some call it) because I have been in the situation many times. The deal is this, you post photos, I take apart photos and point out flaws, I get yelled at and told to find proof of my case, I do, I post it, I get yelled at, so I go back to picking apart other peoples proof, the cycle repeats, so if I come across harsh its just me being tired, I really do appreciate the effort people put into it when they post that many pics, its more effort than I put into most things, but they must be torn down, because they aren't correct. Feel free to post contradictory statements if you wish, I will give them thought if they are truly worth it

EDIT: this didn't occur to me until now, but you all can feel free to use email at [e-mail] to send me anything you want (except viruses, lets keep it legal folks) and I'll respond, the only danger here is that I reserve the right to post those emails if I feel it necessary, and not just on this forum, if you want to tell me you hate me, tell me you love me, email me proof for one side or another, or if you just need help or need a file that I have(I helped Flaming Pie and I freely give out my Beatles music video collection) feel free to use the email and send me a line, try to include your name but if you forget I won't hurt you...badly

[danny2]

Within said:

I would like to add that I appreciate you posting all these pics, and I understand n00bism (as some call it) because I have been in the situation many times. The deal is this, you post photos, I take apart photos and point out flaws, I get yelled at and told to find proof of my case, I do, I post it, I get yelled at, so I go back to picking apart other peoples proof, the cycle repeats, so if I come across harsh its just me being tired, I really do appreciate the effort people put into it when they post that many pics, its more effort than I put into most things, but they must be torn down, because they aren't correct. Feel free to post contradictory statements if you wish, I will give them thought if they are truly worth it

To begin with, if you will take another look at that first photograph.. Paul isn't that far behind Ringo.. The toe of Paul's left foot is almost touching the toe of Ringo's left foot.

Also if Paul being behind Ringo makes him that much shorter than the rest of the Beatles as you say.. Then John Lennon should be the tallest one in that Photo since he is the closest. It is George Harrison that appears tallest in that Photo..



There is a height difference between Ringo and Paul of a couple inches as you said. However, if you were to take Paul/Faul from a later photo and paste him into that same picture he would still tower over everyone including himself.. If that is really him..

[MMCDHoward]

Now you're thinking on your feet! You seem to be right at first glance, but take a look at John's feet, he's on a downward slant from George, as Paul is from Ringo, that also makes them appear shorter.

[MMCDHoward]

hm? Already deleted his account, shame, I liked this one, he showed real thought, especially in that second post, maybe he'll come back?

[beatled]

I hate to say this Within, but this wasn't n00bism... (I think you figured that out, right?)

[MMCDHoward]

Danny said:

Notice also that in the above left photo Paul/Faul is holding a cigarette in his right hand.

I would like to add that if you look here: 60if.proboards21.com/index.cgi?board=Essential&action=display&thread=1088440654
you will find that there is a pic of the "real" Paul doing the same thing

[TotalInformation]

Jim probably died from complications after his visit to the farm in Scotland. Linda made Jim & Angie sleep on a mattress in one of the outbuildings. There was no heat. She also would not allow them to cook in her kitchen because they ate meat

ABBEY - do you have a cite for this?

Thanks.

[MMCDHoward]

Beatled said:

I hate to say this Within, but this wasn't n00bism... (I think you figured that out, right?)

haha, yeah I figured as much, but let it be (no pun intended) she'll wear out in time