|
|
Post by Imaloser on Oct 10, 2005 13:12:58 GMT
If it's true ...... who's the "Imitator"?
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Oct 10, 2005 14:46:19 GMT
I think DZ has a good hypothesis.
BP & Admin need to put their heads together & give one final post that explains the whole Neil=Faul connection.
I can see the resemblance between the two men. It has been postulated that Faul was there from the beginning. So was Neil. And the person who is with Johnny on that bus does NOT look like the man who is sitting with him at that table.
They look like two different people.
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 10, 2005 15:37:42 GMT
If it's true ...... who's the "Imitator"? The best candidate is still Denny Laine. It was just a wrong reference about those pictures. |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 10, 2005 17:08:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Oct 10, 2005 17:52:48 GMT
BP that is incredible. The only thing that has me confused is that Neil seems to have a small forehead like Paul did. As I have shown in the past, Bill has a large forehead. Also, Neil's ears look different than Bill's do when he's not wearing the prosthetics. Could something have happened to Neil, & then Bill whomever was brought in to replace him ? I can see how this can get confusing for some people   |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 10, 2005 18:12:26 GMT
BP that is incredible. The only thing that has me confused is that Neil seems to have a small forehead like Paul did. You can see Neil/Bill true forehead there. Also, Neil's ears look different than Bill's do when he's not wearing the prosthetics. Strange? Could something have happened to Neil, & then Bill whomever was brought in to replace him ? I can see how this can get confusing for some people At last there is NO CONFUSION. |
|
Maacc
Contributor
Hail Hail
Posts: 89
|
Post by Maacc on Oct 11, 2005 9:17:05 GMT
Sorry - I'm not sure anyone is clear about anything on this thread. Neil and Faul exist independently. Neil is bald. Faul has thinning hair. Both have been seen together frequently. Neil works ofr Apple to this day, has occasionally griped about Faul, has a different build and frame, can't sing very well and doesn't didn't look anything like Faul. I don't buy this at all and I think you're muddying the waters unnecessarily here. I also think it's starting to call into question the validity of cross fades, because although the pictures blend well, the bottom line for me is that the two individuals look totally different. I also think the Denny Laine thing is a pointless red herring. IMO.
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 11, 2005 9:48:23 GMT
Sorry - I'm not sure anyone is clear about anything on this thread. Neil and Faul exist independently. Neil is bald. Faul has thinning hair. Both have been seen together frequently. Neil works ofr Apple to this day, has occasionally griped about Faul, has a different build and frame, can't sing very well and doesn't didn't look anything like Faul. I don't buy this at all and I think you're muddying the waters unnecessarily here. I also think it's starting to call into question the validity of cross fades, because although the pictures blend well, the bottom line for me is that the two individuals look totally different. I also think the Denny Laine thing is a pointless red herring. IMO. That proves that you post WITHOUT reading threads. |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 11, 2005 9:51:13 GMT
"And that is the mysterious Neil Aspinall. Thank you Neil for holding it together for all these years, because really, the whole phenomenon might not have happened or stayed together as long as it did without him. He’s helped us, he’s helped his family and George loved him dearly and many of you as well, so thank you very much."
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 11, 2005 13:01:27 GMT
Let me try..
The person in the middle is singing Hey Jude.(Faul)(Neil Aspinall)
The person on the right is in a separate photgraph.
He looks like he could be Neil Aspinall Part Deux.(big chin/Jaw)
Two Neils Side by Side.
Things are beginning to make more sense to me now...
btw those dark diagonal lines, on each face seem to be
shadows or pic defects.  Ahhh ... TheDZ .... EXCELLENT AS ALWAYS |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Oct 11, 2005 16:15:32 GMT
Like I've stated, Bill has a very large forehead:   I've been looking back & forth between photos of Bill & Neil. It does seem that they have similar lines in their foreheads. Neil:  Bill:  As much as I want to believe that the Neil in the above photo is the "Paul" of today, I just can't see it. Neil seemed to have been about Paul's true size. As we all know, Bill is a much larger man than Paul was. Again Neil:  Bill:  Neil:  Bill:  To me, Neil's forehead looks too small for him to be Bill. I contend that Neil might've filled him for Paul briefly, until they found someone permanent. Why they didn't stick with Neil is my question. He definitely was a much better match as a replacement for Paul. UNLESS - he also was eliminated because he wouldn't "play ball " with TPTB  |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 11, 2005 17:11:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 11, 2005 20:42:53 GMT
SMA, that's the answer to your doubt. |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Oct 12, 2005 15:47:35 GMT
If that cast is truly of "Bill", it doesn't prove much. BP, we already know that they have tampered with & altered so many things to try to make "Bill" look more like Paul. Why wouldn't they alter the forehead in the cast to make it smaller. I'm sure it's not beyond their ability. Let's say that they didn't do so. I still think that the forehead in the cast appears bigger than the original Neil's forehead was. Look, I'm not saying that I don't think that Neil impersonated Paul. I think your comparison of the photo of him & the psychedelic poster of "Paul" is pretty much airtight. What I can't see is how he can be the same man who has been impersonating Paul from Sgt. Pepper onwards. He looks like he was an all around smaller man. I just found a website with another photo of the false Neil. Here's a link to it. www.maccafan.net/Friends/a/aspinall.htmThe audacity of the people behind this whole fiasco never fails to amaze me. He looks NOTHING like the original Neil Aspinall. The fake Neil:  The real Neil: The fake Neil's eyes look totally different. They're set deeper. And they appear to have different shaped faces. There is a short biography on that page that states that Neil was a friend of Paul's from school. This only confirms my suspicions. I wouldn't be surprised if he was initially lied to. That's how they got him to impersonate Paul. Later on, he must've either been told the truth or figured it out himself. That's when he stopped cooperating, & they felt the need to eliminate him. The more I get into this, the worse it gets |
|
|
|
Post by andrewexelor on Oct 12, 2005 18:58:47 GMT
feil and faul or feil and paul? |
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on Oct 12, 2005 19:14:38 GMT
There is no Feil. And that's Faul. I'd say around 1969 or '70...
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 12, 2005 19:44:47 GMT
There is no Feil. And that's Faul. I'd say around 1969 or '70... Are you sure? |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 12, 2005 19:49:45 GMT
I suggest people to read ALL this thread (from the beginning) before posting here.
Please tell me if you CAN'T SEE all the pictures I've posted.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 12, 2005 19:57:32 GMT
If that cast is truly of "Bill", it doesn't prove much. Why? To learn MORE about Bill/Neil forehead see that picture: digilander.libero.it/Sun_King/billy_shepherd/billy_shears.jpgHeavy to load but.... Look at his prothesis on his forehead... ...and dear SMA ... the forehead length DEPENDS on where the wig is attached.... |
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on Oct 12, 2005 20:30:02 GMT
|
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator 
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Oct 13, 2005 3:17:00 GMT
You've got to be kidding... |
|
Maacc
Contributor
Hail Hail
Posts: 89
|
Post by Maacc on Oct 13, 2005 6:49:46 GMT
Looks awfully like Chevy Chase. Wait a minute...you don't think... |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 13, 2005 8:32:58 GMT
Looks awfully like Chevy Chase. Wait a minute...you don't think... Since the same cap? More like Joe Cocker then.....   |
|
Maacc
Contributor
Hail Hail
Posts: 89
|
Post by Maacc on Oct 13, 2005 12:40:15 GMT
Ok - despite the dig above from BP - I just want to say I've read the thread 3 times now. I still don't understand what the point of the thread is though. Can someone spell it out in black and white for me just what is being stated here? Are we saying that Neil had surgery to impersonate Paul and, for example, it's him (Neil) that appears in the Hey Jude video? Thus it would follow that there was no William Shepherd? I was right into the Billy Shears thing, man. Or are we saying Neil temporarily impersonated Paul until Billy was up to speed, meaning Neil went back to being Neil after more surgery? If so, when did Billy start with the band?
I'm certain I haven't understood something, so please, I'm thick, someone spell it out for me.
(I still think it looks a lot like Chevy. Has anyone done a cross fade on those hats?)
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Oct 14, 2005 1:14:38 GMT
JoJo sent me that photo telling that it was from the Anthology collection and it was labelled as "Neil Aspinall on 1966" So: That man is the same of: - Magical Mystery Tour on bus rear seats man - Hey Jude Video - Crippled Inside video eyes - Beatles Album "Number One" back cover "Paul" portrait artwork That's ALL what I know. There was "another" man on Magical Mystery Tour named as "Neil Aspinall" Is the man above the true Neil Aspinall? - I don't know Is the man above our "Faul"? - YES |
|
