|
Post by BeatlePaul on Mar 7, 2005 6:16:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Mar 7, 2005 13:14:53 GMT
JoJo, fantastic, "# 24 is 2 elderly identical twins, their heads close together.. (look in the area of the lower right hand corner) Once you see it, well..that's what it is, yes."
Im not so sure about #16, i think you can actually see some ghostly silhouettes in the background.
Beatle Paul, isn't #6 his dog martha? and just to make sure ive got it right are you saying #10 is the beach or sea or something?
|
|
|
Post by valis on Mar 7, 2005 18:58:14 GMT
Some quick remarks, I still disagree with JoJo that #11 is a studiocontrolpanel, if it was then the buttons would be way bigger than those on a "My First Sony. ;D I still believe it's a TV or stereo remote control in closeup, it's also symbollicaly relevant, especially connected to the #11 I've done some more thinking of #24, at first I thought it was a pic of an elderly man with his reflection in a window, the background looks fuzzy like the pic is taken from inside a driving train, but in a way after looking harder it doesn't seem to mirror well, giving me an initial conclusion that those are 2 different people. Maybe someone who knows a little bit more about photography and reflections can help out. I also hope anyone can tell what that towerstructure # 27 is, a windmill, telephoneline, watertank, can anyone say for sure? We don't have those here in the Dutch Octopus' Garden All Lve Jan
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Mar 7, 2005 19:16:58 GMT
# 27 diving boards?
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Mar 7, 2005 21:02:22 GMT
#26
The typical face expression of one who is falling from a high altitude.
Isn't it?
#27
Stupid Bloody Tuedsay?
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Mar 7, 2005 21:28:06 GMT
#15On the night of Thursday September 15 we travelled by train from Hamburg to Paris, met up with Paul....
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Mar 7, 2005 21:45:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Mar 7, 2005 22:04:55 GMT
Some quick remarks, I still disagree with JoJo that #11 is a studiocontrolpanel, if it was then the buttons would be way bigger than those on a "My First Sony. ;D I still believe it's a TV or stereo remote control in closeup, it's also symbollicaly relevant, especially connected to the #11 It REALLY seems to be my "oldies but goldies" SONY RM-831
|
|
|
Post by beatled on Mar 8, 2005 0:20:26 GMT
It REALLY seems to be my "oldies but goldies" SONY RM-831 Heh! ;D You're right Valis!
|
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Mar 8, 2005 2:04:24 GMT
http://*banned link*/Shoebox/DrivingRain/DrivingRainFull.jpg[/img] I am the walrus #27?
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Mar 8, 2005 9:43:42 GMT
#20: A still living Frian?
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Mar 8, 2005 9:51:52 GMT
Works for me. Perhaps, though, semi-retired.......
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 8, 2005 15:18:32 GMT
Hmmm, could Larry King aka Larry Ziegler ahve been the faux Brian?
Well, anything's possible. Every day it's becoming ore apparent that Jeff Gannon is really Johnny Gosch...
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 8, 2005 15:59:22 GMT
The nose looks the same to me
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Mar 9, 2005 0:58:56 GMT
Hmmm, could Larry King aka Larry Ziegler ahve been the faux Brian? Well, anything's possible. Every day it's becoming ore apparent that Jeff Gannon is really Johnny Gosch... I wish there was a better picture of Gosch. It doesn't seem to me like that kid could grow up to look like Gannon--esp. the full lips in the young picture. But boys' looks change more than girls, I think. Do you have any other young Gosch pics?
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Mar 9, 2005 3:44:42 GMT
I don't know who Gannon or Gosch are. Excuse my ignorance.
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Mar 9, 2005 6:45:13 GMT
Hmmm, could Larry King aka Larry Ziegler ahve been the faux Brian? Well, anything's possible. Every day it's becoming ore apparent that Jeff Gannon is really Johnny Gosch... I dunno, but, Gannon = G-Anon, or G. Anonymous. And, Jeff could be J. F. So, J.F.G. might = Johnny F. Gosch (Anonymously) What was his middle name?
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 9, 2005 11:39:37 GMT
Neither do I
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Mar 9, 2005 17:28:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Mar 9, 2005 18:58:38 GMT
|
|
|
Post by philovance on Mar 9, 2005 19:55:01 GMT
on Mar 8th, 2005, 10:44pm, Paul Bearer wrote: I don't know who Gannon or Gosch are. Excuse my ignorance www.johnnygosch.com/johnny_story.htmlWhat Happened to Johnny Gosch...... On September 5, 1982, Johnny Gosch was abducted while doing his Sunday morning paper route, for the Des Moines Register. This day began an 18 year search for Johnny, and the truth. Johnny's abduction was not by chance. Evidence indicates Johnny's picture was shown to several people the night before, as the child they would abduct in the morning. In 1989, Paul Bonacci provided his attorney, John DeCamp, with information indicating he had participated in the abduction of a Des Moines, Iowa paper boy. This paper boy was Johnny Gosch. Bonacci's testimony provided a great deal of information about Johnny and his case, however local authorities refuse to interview him, questioning his credibility. According to numerous reports by Paul Bonacci, Michael LaVey (son of Anton LaVey), and Johnny Gosch himself, Johnny was taken by a highly organized, very corporate global pedophile/pornography ring. Evidence links this same porno/pedophile ring to the 80's 'congressional call boy scandal', money laundering, drug running, illegal arms deals and more. Like so many others, before and since, Johnny was subjected to severe trauma and torture of a satanic and sexual nature, in order to intentionally destroy the conscious personality.... brainwashing. This intentional application of trauma is a systematic procedure used to control these victims, in order to use them in sexual slavery, pornography and more. In February 1999, in Federal Court testimony in Omaha Nebraska, Noreen Gosch testified that Johnny Gosch came to see her in 1997, providing information about his experience, asking for his mother's help and pleading for her to not reveal his visit. Johnny is now 31 years old. After years of suffering tremendous torture and pain at the hands of his captors, being used and abused, he and several others escaped. They have been living in hiding under new identities... they fear for their lives. People ask ... why is it necessary for someone to hide and live this way..... It is simple, Johnny can identify many of the people involved and would be a threat to the very people who took him. He is known as the "chameleon". Why? Because he can so completely change his appearance. He would like to be a part of his family once again but it isn't safe. The people who take these children also do a thorough job of brainwashing. Telling these young children that if they try to resume any kind of life with their families.... they will be killed. It is enough of a threat and fear to these young people ....that they do not try to contact their families. Johnny took a chance to come and see his mother for a very short time. He wanted to give her information, in the hope she could bring it out to the public. Information about this network of pedophiles and how they operate. He is very angry about what has happened to him and the years with his family which have been taken from him. Who could blame any of these young people for being angry at the system. A number of the other victims who Noreen has had the opportunity to know... have given her a lot of information about Johnny and the times they were with him. She was told he would try to calm some of the others when they would be upset and afraid. That would be so like him due to the kind nature he had as a little boy. The sadness and pain which is felt by Johnny, and for Johnny by his family, is something difficult to describe to others who have not experienced it. People who take children.... Pedophiles are the most dangerous predators on our planet. It is Johnny's hope that one day he can walk as a free man.... free to see his family again without threat of harm to himself and others. My Comments: The world seems to go full circle. I would not be at all surprised that Gosch is "Gannon". John deCamp, the attorney exposing the pedaphile scandal known as "The Franklin Coverup" in Omaha, Nebraska, claims that the judge in the case has a videotape of George Bush Sr. engaging in pedaphile activity with a young boy at a location owned by Warren Buffet. The judge refuses to release this tape which should be in the public record. It appears probable that Gosch's relation with the Bush satanists continues.
|
|
|
Post by philovance on Mar 9, 2005 20:05:02 GMT
Just discovered this post at Rense's website www.rense.com/general63/100.htm 100% Confirmation Gannon/Guckert Is Johnny Gosch From Tim White phantom469366@yahoo.com 3-7-5 Last evening, I received a call from Ted Gunderson who is presently in Nebraska to interview a central figure in the Franklin Coverup case that is at the root of this "Jeff Gannon" story. A confidential source of Ted's has - in a conversation with Ted yesterday afternoon - given a 100% confirmation that Jeff Gannon/Jim Guckert is very definitely Johnny Gosch. Ted has the full backing and authority of the mother of Johnny, Noreen Gosch, to handle this - as only Ted would know how - along with the complete assistance of John DeCamp. Ted and John DeCamp are the investigators and exposers of the Franklin Coverup. Ted has given me the greenlight to write and post this much so far but for very obvious reasons, I cannot go into greater detail at this time. As I have been told, more information will soon be forthcoming with the authorization to post when I receive it. Tim White Viet Nam Vet (Air Force) Concerned Citizen
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Mar 9, 2005 23:55:01 GMT
This topic is already in the Celebrity Vortex.
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 10, 2005 17:19:46 GMT
That is truly horrible... What a world we live in !
|
|
|
Post by philovance on Mar 14, 2005 23:21:46 GMT
|
|