|
Post by Big GM on Oct 26, 2003 6:15:34 GMT
Don't forget that Brian Epstein's death/disappearance/replacement is just as important to reveal in case you want to expose 'Faul' for what he is. Although his replacement died in 1967 people have been just as must fooled by his replacement as by the replacement of James Paul.
It's 100% clear that post 1966 McCartney isn't the same man as pre 1966 McCartney. It's equally clear that Brian Epstein was replaced too. No one seemed to wonder why he suddenly picked up smoking at such age. Just as no one seemed to question why Paul gained a few inches in length at such age.
Something is definitely not right.
|
|
|
Post by Otacon on Dec 24, 2003 6:08:51 GMT
I'm guessing they created the illusion that "Paul" was still the same height by having him wear boots with thick heels...but I never knew that about Frian...very interesting
You're right, how people couldn't have picked up on it is amazing, yet now so many people are yet Faul looks a lot more like what pre 66 JP would look like than he did back then...sorry to stray kind of off topic
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Dec 25, 2003 18:30:05 GMT
Good post, Guest, but not entirely right. Case in point: Early 1964 photo of Brian and Beatles, with George Martin, celebrating first US #1 single record. Brian puts a chamber pot on his head for the pic, and in his left hand is a cigar...in his right hand is a lighter. Brian smoked, just was a casual smoker as opposed to the heavy, constant action the band displayed. I have often wondered, personally, how in the hell Paul & John's voices stayed so clear and perfect while they chain-smoked year after year!
|
|
|
Post by Otacon on Feb 1, 2004 4:44:26 GMT
Well, John's did catch up with him...it did start to get a lot thinner towards the break up.
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Nov 25, 2006 1:33:25 GMT
Don't forget that Brian Epstein's death/disappearance/replacement is just as important to reveal in case you want to expose 'Faul' for what he is. Although his replacement died in 1967 people have been just as must fooled by his replacement as by the replacement of James Paul. It's 100% clear that post 1966 McCartney isn't the same man as pre 1966 McCartney. It's equally clear that Brian Epstein was replaced too. No one seemed to wonder why he suddenly picked up smoking at such age. Just as no one seemed to question why Paul gained a few inches in length at such age. Something is definitely not right. Now that Bill uses fewer make-up we can see at last how he is still more similar to his previous role inside the Beatles than to Paul Thank You Again Big GM
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Nov 25, 2006 1:43:06 GMT
OMG that's ridiculous.
You're better off comparing that Brian pic with LSD Paul judging by those eyebrows, well, at least they might match!
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Nov 25, 2006 23:23:28 GMT
OMG that's ridiculous. You're better off comparing that Brian pic with LSD Paul judging by those eyebrows, well, at least they might match! Why is it ridiculous? It obviously matches. Bill/Faul replaced Brian before he replaced Paul, and it appears that he was far better suited as a replacement for Brian. Bill's face, head shape, height, build and so on were much more similar to Brian Epstein, than to Paul. This leads me to think that Paul was not really supposed to be replaced. Billy was only supposed to replace Brian. And then something must have happened to Paul that created an emergency situation. Bill was not a natural ringer for Paul, and was probably not the "best" person available to replace him since they looked so different. But Bill already had inside knowledge of the Beatles, having acted as Brian for the past year, and as Neil Apsinall even before that. As for eyebrows, they can be plucked out and painted back on changing the shape or location. Look at bone structure instead. The two on the left are just the same man, and NOT the same man as James Paul on the right.
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Nov 26, 2006 22:12:22 GMT
OMG that's ridiculous. You're better off comparing that Brian pic with LSD Paul judging by those eyebrows, well, at least they might match! Don't forget.... all already published here
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Nov 27, 2006 11:28:50 GMT
How could I forget?
I suppose I negelected the fact that it's already been proven, with all these clear "undeniable proofs" how is it that we are still the only little niche that believe PID?
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Nov 28, 2006 4:27:43 GMT
How could I forget? I suppose I negelected the fact that it's already been proven, with all these clear "undeniable proofs" how is it that we are still the only little niche that believe PID? Not to be a Negative Nelly, pp, but it is because we are doomed. [But only in the best possible way...... ;D]
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Feb 14, 2007 19:10:31 GMT
Ancient Wisdom: The simplelist explanation that accounts for the most facts is the best one. When I saw this page suggesting Brian took the place of Paul the whole PID conspiracy (mostly) made sense to me. The Beatles were a British Intelligence Operation to manipulate and control the youth of the world. I realise that people say the Illuminati, Satanist, Aliens etc.,ect. are behind British Intelligence, but I am saying that ON THE GROUND it was UK military. Brian Epstein was the Beatles agent AND secret agent. Nov. 9, 1961 is stated over and over as the date Brian first saw the Beatles. Then Brian signed then to a five year contract. Nov. 9, 1966 is the date Paul "died." What that says to me is that pauls' contract was up!!! The contract may have stated or implied that Brian Epstein will make the Beatles the biggest band in the world and in exchange HE OWNS THEM!!!! A deal with the "Devil"!! He could do that because he had the help from the government, EMI ect. Paul and maybe George and John wanted OUT. But there is only one way out. Paul was killed as an example. ( I realise Paul could have been left alive but to me it seems unlikely.) Then the kicker- BRIAN REPLACED PAUL!!! He was with the Beatles from at least 1961, he had been in the military {maybe trained by William Stevenson(the model for James Bond)}and he may of written some of their songs. He looks a lot like paul and with plastic surgery and his acting training he could of passed. He learned how to play left handed. I think other rock stars knew but they were under similer contracts. The families kept quiet because they knew that was in the contract. That is the basic outline of my theory anyone have anything else to add, I would love to hear it. As the Eagles said-"You can check out any time you like but can never leave"!!
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Feb 15, 2007 23:29:11 GMT
Ancient Wisdom: The simplelist explanation that accounts for the most facts is the best one. When I saw this page suggesting Brian took the place of Paul the whole PID conspiracy (mostly) made sense to me. The Beatles were a British Intelligence Operation to manipulate and control the youth of the world. I realise that people say the Illuminati, Satanist, Aliens etc.,ect. are behind British Intelligence, but I am saying that ON THE GROUND it was UK military. Brian Epstein was the Beatles agent AND secret agent. Nov. 9, 1961 is stated over and over as the date Brian first saw the Beatles. Then Brian signed then to a five year contract. Nov. 9, 1966 is the date Paul "died." What that says to me is that pauls' contract was up!!! The contract may have stated or implied that Brian Epstein will make the Beatles the biggest band in the world and in exchange HE OWNS THEM!!!! A deal with the "Devil"!! He could do that because he had the help from the government, EMI ect. Paul and maybe George and John wanted OUT. But there is only one way out. Paul was killed as an example. ( I realise Paul could have been left alive but to me it seems unlikely.) Then the kicker- BRIAN REPLACED PAUL!!! He was with the Beatles from at least 1961, he had been in the military {maybe trained by William Stevenson(the model for James Bond)}and he may of written some of their songs. He looks a lot like paul and with plastic surgery and his acting training he could of passed. He learned how to play left handed. I think other rock stars knew but they were under similer contracts. The families kept quiet because they knew that was in the contract. That is the basic outline of my theory anyone have anything else to add, I would love to hear it. As the Eagles said-"You can check out any time you like but can never leave"!! Good note. Just an add on: Billy Shepherd AKA Phil Ackrill took Brian place (probably at the beginning of 1965) then on August 23th 1966 he "wanted" to be Faux Paul McCartney too. All the rest is what you have just said.... P.S. Officially "Paul McCartney" worked for DECCA on November 1966 for "A Family Way" soundtrack. For more information click on "search" icon of this forum....
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Feb 16, 2007 4:17:52 GMT
P.S. Officially "Paul McCartney" worked for DECCA on November 1966 for "A Family Way" soundtrack. For more information click on "search" icon of this forum.... Well, that makes that score a sort of "Macca Decca Do."
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Apr 23, 2007 22:09:55 GMT
Don't forget that Brian Epstein's death/disappearance/replacement is just as important to reveal in case you want to expose 'Faul' for what he is. Although his replacement died in 1967 people have been just as must fooled by his replacement as by the replacement of James Paul. It's 100% clear that post 1966 McCartney isn't the same man as pre 1966 McCartney. It's equally clear that Brian Epstein was replaced too. No one seemed to wonder why he suddenly picked up smoking at such age. Just as no one seemed to question why Paul gained a few inches in length at such age. Something is definitely not right. .... no, we don't forget it, Big GM ...
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Apr 24, 2007 0:16:59 GMT
His eyes are raising and his ear is shrinking. Oh, sorry, all due to surgery of course.... Ahem
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Apr 24, 2007 19:42:42 GMT
His eyes are raising and his ear is shrinking. Oh, sorry, all due to surgery of course.... Ahem Try to keep the mouse arrow tip on his irises. They don't move at all. How many times have you see here and on N-I-R Bill wearing fake rubber ears to "lower" their position like this:
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Jul 11, 2008 8:33:37 GMT
Don't forget that Brian Epstein's death/disappearance/replacement is just as important to reveal in case you want to expose 'Faul' for what he is. Although his replacement died in 1967 people have been just as must fooled by his replacement as by the replacement of James Paul. It's 100% clear that post 1966 McCartney isn't the same man as pre 1966 McCartney. It's equally clear that Brian Epstein was replaced too. No one seemed to wonder why he suddenly picked up smoking at such age. Just as no one seemed to question why Paul gained a few inches in length at such age. Something is definitely not right. Lady Madonna
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Jul 11, 2008 10:16:13 GMT
Don't forget that Brian Epstein's death/disappearance/replacement is just as important to reveal in case you want to expose 'Faul' for what he is. Although his replacement died in 1967 people have been just as must fooled by his replacement as by the replacement of James Paul. It's 100% clear that post 1966 McCartney isn't the same man as pre 1966 McCartney. It's equally clear that Brian Epstein was replaced too. No one seemed to wonder why he suddenly picked up smoking at such age. Just as no one seemed to question why Paul gained a few inches in length at such age. Something is definitely not right. Lady Madonna Tripping the Life Fantastic
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Jul 14, 2008 10:30:58 GMT
|
|
Soothsayer
Contributor
A knight at the crossroads
Posts: 135
|
Post by Soothsayer on Jul 18, 2008 0:07:19 GMT
"McCartneys Independant Traders" (heh ;D ) Nice pic of Trig & Rodders, where's Del & Uncle Albert?? Whilst these daft photoshops are highly hilarious, how about doing something constructive, like removing the blocks, & allowing freedom of choice for those people that have earned it?.. Just a thought..
|
|
|
Post by steve1967 on Oct 30, 2009 18:26:37 GMT
The convenient timing of Brian's death with the trip to Bangor needs discussion, and why the Stones tagged along - remember the doll in Sgt Pepper.
|
|