|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Aug 20, 2003 20:47:45 GMT
My thoughts: Get rid of Tara Browne and keep Doris Day.
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Aug 20, 2003 21:00:03 GMT
All there is to say about Tara Browne is:
a) He makes a better Paul than Faul
b) He was probably the first of the many killed to keep the secret.
Uberkinder, I agree the wording of the text on the Browne page was unclear.
|
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Aug 21, 2003 5:06:40 GMT
welcome snoopy! those are some great observations you have made! keep up the good work!
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Aug 21, 2003 5:21:30 GMT
Snoopy et al -- the guest on CoastToCoast before Patterson was Jon Rappaport (former ABC reporter) talking about the power grid hijinx.. Rappaport has written a lot about mass mind-control. It is mass mind-control that was at the very center of the cryptocracy's motive for the Faul Operation or Operation Walrus, or what have you. Rappaport's website is www.nomorefakenews.com He updates it regularly, but the archives are in a premium sectionl it's usually worth keeping an eye on. |
|
|
|
Post by chesterfullerton on Aug 21, 2003 5:44:25 GMT
I've looked at the evidence site and was not convinced. Mainly because I'm a photographer and know how lenses can distort faces. I also think the biggest part of why the faces don't match is because the band members were alcoholics and abused drugs during their short run as the Beatles. This, in my opinion account for why many of head shots don't match up. Often, they were inebriated, high and swollen from their addictions to the stuff.
In fact, there are hundreds of photos pre-Faul that don't match the supposed Paul and some real Paul that match Faul perfectly.
Well, I love the site and a good conspiracy theory. ;D
I'm new to the site, too, and I just love reading everyones POV.
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Aug 21, 2003 5:51:19 GMT
Yeah, one time I had this hangover, and damned if my ears hadn't moved a couple inches.  |
|
|
|
Post by tinyelvis on Aug 21, 2003 5:54:50 GMT
what proof do you have that Mark David Chapman was controlled by the CIA or any other "mind control agency"?
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Aug 21, 2003 6:16:23 GMT
re: Chapman.
Find the thread on Lennon's assassination on the "Other Beatles" board, and start there.
Read up on MK-ULTRA.
Read up on the Reagan assassination attempt, compare methodologies.
That should get you started.
|
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Aug 21, 2003 14:10:48 GMT
I am a new member here today, only because I heard this site referenced (and slandered) on Coast to Coast. Luckily, I do not pass judgement upon ideas before checking them out. I visited the site, and was impressed by the visual comparisons and the morphing technique was very compelling and used superbly. You make your case and I am of the opinion that you have proved beyond a doubt that the Paul in the Butcher Block photos is NOT the same person, beginning with the Sgt. Pepper pics. By the way, I am 42 years old and a Beatles worshipper since age 3 in 1964. I have been very aware and interested in the PID situation since 1971. Your site laid it all out for all to see. The points you have showen which carry the most evidential weight are: Obvious head size/shape differential. Utterly IMPOSSIBLE, not only from Nov. of '66 to April of '67, but any time or year. Cranial changes that radical do NOT occur. Obvious space between the eyes differential. This, like head shape and size, CANNOT be changed or altered in any person. It remains a lifelong constant, just like blood type and DNA (throw in eye color, too!) Obvious height differential. Standing Beatles in Sgt. Pepper garb says it all; any intelligent Beatles head knows Paul, John, and George were ALL about 5'11". But Faul is half-a-head taller than the other two by time the album shoot occurred. The Jane Asher pics were one of the clinchers for me: he and jane, about same height in '66, but Faul towering above her in '67 replete with the big, elongated uber-head! maybe I'm amazed!!!! (couldn't resist.) The voice spectrographs are also scientific evidence; we keep our unique voice print throughout life, just like our blood type and DNA. Eye coloring; noted. Obvious radical nose shape change noted. Upper lip issues noted. The amazing traveling chin scars/cleft....moves around almost as much as Faul's ear placement! You have made your case, presented it excellently, and any person with an open mind and critical eye for detail can see easily; These are TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE. And, my personal aside: anyone who thinks for a minute that the perpetuation of the greatest entertaining group in history, let alone the billions of dollars at stake, is not just two good reasons and motivators for creating a Faul...has no right to read this! Also, in conclusion, Noorey should offer you equal time, or even one or two hours to defend yourself and discuss your research. The guy they had was rife with simply incorrect statements and half-baked opinions. The wealth of photographic evidence on YOUR site is not opinion...and I believe could hold up in a court of LAW. POWER TO THE PEOPLE! -Ian Singleton  |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 21, 2003 14:17:02 GMT
IanSingleton777: You have just done a [glow=red,2,300]MASTERPIECE!!![/glow] |
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Aug 21, 2003 14:21:48 GMT
 It's EXACTLY what they want to do. Discredit the whole idea !!! All we need is love & THE TRUTH !!! Chris  Noted; the guest spends hours covering the material, albeit flawed, then lightly agrees with Noorey that Paul is alive and well, with a chuckle... |
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Aug 21, 2003 20:42:29 GMT
welcome ian! excellent post! you should be a lawyer! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by OceanChild on Aug 21, 2003 21:23:26 GMT
The winnder of the lookalike, which was in 1965, was Keith Allison. Just found out: It was an American Bandstand look-alike competition. Pictures of Keith Allison can be seen here. |
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Aug 21, 2003 21:28:39 GMT
;D Very well done Ian !!!!!! I'm impressed as well !!! All we need is love & THE TRUTH !!!! Chris ;D 
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 21, 2003 21:43:17 GMT
Just found out: It was an American Bandstand look-alike competition. Pictures of Keith Allison can be seen here. WOW!!! Much better than Bill! But he wasn't an imitator too, I suppose.... |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 21, 2003 21:55:22 GMT
...just fixing the teeth... I think if Keith would be a good voice imitator too, now we couldn't tell about Faul's differences... |
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Aug 21, 2003 22:09:26 GMT
Just found out: It was an American Bandstand look-alike competition. Pictures of Keith Allison can be seen here. EXCELLENT, Ocean Child....just caught the "guest" in another falsehood, as he stated the winner was "Keith" who sang the song "98.6". He was ill-informed on many things, to say the least |
|
|
|
Post by OceanChild on Aug 21, 2003 22:18:29 GMT
EXCELLENT, Ocean Child....just caught the "guest" in another falsehood, as he stated the winner was "Keith" who sang the song "98.6". He was ill-informed on many things, to say the least Apparently there was someone called Keith who sang 98.6. He looks nothing like Paul though! |
|
|
|
Post by Revolver on Aug 22, 2003 0:13:27 GMT
Chris is right, C2C is disinfo to the max. The best way to kill a rumour is to let it fall under the weight of its own disbelief, and that is the purpose of the 'guest.' Dont see too many post 67 photos of 'Paul's' teeth now do we?
|
|
|
|
Post by chesterfullerton on Aug 22, 2003 0:55:44 GMT
This Keith dude doesn't look anything like Paul. It would take guite a bit of plastic surgery to do him up like Paul, too.
|
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Aug 22, 2003 3:17:15 GMT
Correct. That so-called "expert" has a lot to learn |
|
It's EXACTLY what they want to do. Discredit the whole idea !!!
