|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Sept 26, 2003 2:47:48 GMT
hey ian maybe you should have a few more solo macca discs in your collection then i could actually take your criticisms seriously!!!!! There are no solo macca discs. PID. Maybe you should read slowly and carefully WHAT THIS FORUM IS ALL ABOUT. Then we can discuss everything, criticisms and all, SERIOUSLY. lol! ;D
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Sept 26, 2003 2:48:47 GMT
You have to admit that his solo work doesn't compare with the work that he did in the Beatles.....we all know why KANE1000 DOESN'T KNOW WHY
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Sept 26, 2003 11:20:56 GMT
I am happy you are aware of the electronic devices which can perform (and correct) just about anything vocally. Absolutely, Ian. In 1987-1989 I worked in a nightclub that had three rotating house bands. Bands #1 and #2 would fill the place consistantly. Every time Band #3 would perform, it was like pulling teeth to get people in during that week. And weekends were dead because they wouldn't cough up the $3 cover to suffer through Band #3. I listened to countless hours of Band #3, performing 3-4 sets per night, for many weekly stays throughout that time. The lead (only) singer of Band #3 has since become a VERY big "name" in country music. But the voice on the records is nothing like the voice I know. I attributed it to electronics even that long ago, before such things were widely discussed.
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Sept 26, 2003 11:25:22 GMT
i can admit to some of his solo work is better than some of his beatle work,,,cant generalize either way. unless you know and have followed his solo career its just not plausible for your critisms kane1000, I personally like a lot of Faul's music, but it is completely different from James Paul's.
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Sept 26, 2003 14:31:49 GMT
The same here!!! Agree 100% with xpt!!!
|
|
|
Post by kane1000 on Sept 26, 2003 21:28:47 GMT
he's worked with elvis costello..johnny cash....steve miller..ringo starr. eric stewart hamish stuart robbie macintosh mj stevie wonder
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Sept 26, 2003 21:48:24 GMT
LOL Worked with them, or USED them? -Hamish Stuart..USED as side man, doing FAUL'S bidding musically. The poor guy. Surprised FAUL didn't steal his gimmick of wearing a kilt... -Steve Miller...hah! The Beatles argue themselves out of a booked session, so ego-freak FAUL sticks around, to impose himself on someone else's recording? HARDLY collaboration. Laughable!!!!!!!!!! David Gilmour- USED as mercenary for a guitar solo on 'No More Lonely Nights' Bet David doesn't list THAT clunker on his resume! Hysterical Laughter!!!!!!! Linda McCartney- USED as pseudo Yoko; I still recall the video camera zooming in on her playing keyboards...she was USING TWO FINGERS. LMAO. In clear retrospect, FAUL (for PAUL died in 1966) only relinquishes a shred of the limelight when it benefits HIM, or serves a purpose to which HIS STAGE NAME is promenently FEATURED. Michael Jackson- Christ, kill me now. The two plastic surgery freaks (mike & FAUL) attempt simultanious syncophant recognition/career boosts, and release some of the most gawdawful CRAP ever to exist outside of a brainless, uninspired vacuum. I'D RATHER COVER 'Don't Worry, Kyoko' with YOKO!!!!! Say,Say,Say...Paul is a dead man...miss him,miss him, miss him......
|
|
|
Post by kane1000 on Sept 27, 2003 3:09:52 GMT
well with steve miller they actually worked on a few track for pauls flaming pie record.. co wrote...two songs,,,, i think you are referring to my dark hour for steve miller however they do hgave a more recent relationship...again probably don't havre that disc in your collection....
|
|
|
Post by kane1000 on Sept 27, 2003 3:19:56 GMT
let me reply to your previous post ian i have looked at this website now for months seen and heard it over and over..i didn;t scan it eitherr i went over rather thoroughlly and if i don't see eye to eye with most of you i shouldn't be ridiculed...i think it ok to have a different opinion. as for your collection of disc i feel if you don't have a full knowledge of an artist ie have a pretty fair amout of their recordings it tough to take seriously aomeones insults on said artist...ie ok ok i call him faul for this post and i love ringo and the all starrs but im sorry to tell you that he would be unable to tour and carry a 2-3 hour show on his own.....probably he would be the first to tellya all that...Faul with his wealth of material beatles and solo could carry anykind of show for 3 plus hours......that really is not a great comparison........thanx
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Sept 27, 2003 4:24:41 GMT
let me reply to your previous post ian as for your collection of disc i feel if you don't have a full knowledge of an artist ie have a pretty fair amout of their recordings it tough to take seriously someones insults on said artist Faul with his wealth of material beatles and solo could carry anykind of show for 3 plus hours..........thanx Holy Crap! An almost complete collection of Faul cd's? Oh man... how painful & boring could that be? No, just messin' with ya. I always say to each his own. If it gives ya pleasure then it's good to you. I've got Ram, Wings Wildlife, Off The Ground, Mike McGear, & The Liverpool Sound Collage so I think I've sent my share of cash to Faul. That's plenty for me! I think a few others here would agree that faul has proven himself to be one hell of an entertainer. I saw him 10yrs ago & it was an awsome concert. 2-3 hrs, LOTS of Beatles material, good band & excellent sound. I left outta there head spinnin' & slack-jawed....... no argument there from me!
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Sept 27, 2003 10:08:44 GMT
let me reply to your previous post ian as for your collection of disc i feel if you don't have a full knowledge of an artist ie have a pretty fair amout of their recordings it tough to take seriously aomeones insults on said artist...ie ok ok i call him faul for this post Again, you make the arrogant mistake to SUPPOSE anything. I was probably listening & learning about all things BEATLES before you were even born! Quit now, while you can still log-on... Just think, you could watch 'Give My Regards to Broad Street' 24 hours a day, instead of visit here!
|
|
|
Post by kane1000 on Sept 27, 2003 13:31:55 GMT
ian doubtful....about the before i was born statement but thats ok if you think that pre 1967 paul was a genius thats fine i believe it too i just believe he's still a genius i belive you must dig deep into his solo efforts to find that out also! broadst wasn't very good i do agree but the music was..
|
|
|
Post by kane1000 on Sept 27, 2003 13:32:42 GMT
p.s dont appreciate the threat
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 27, 2003 13:43:43 GMT
BTW "Band on the run" was a Bruce Springsteen's song?
The first time I heard it was during Faul's concert in Rome.
I thought it was really a song made by "The Boss"
|
|
|
Post by kane1000 on Sept 27, 2003 15:48:33 GMT
thats wasa recorded in 1973 now im no expert on springsteen was he around in that early part of the 70s
|
|
|
Post by JamesPaul & Brian on Sept 27, 2003 15:54:41 GMT
Yes he was.
|
|
|
Post by Rojopa on Sept 27, 2003 18:01:23 GMT
Faul should just stop touring. He's outlived his expectancy. ;D
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Sept 28, 2003 5:46:31 GMT
I just caught a repeat airing of Faul in Red Square. I was stunned at how bad the first couple of songs sounded...then when they were speaking with him during the interview portions, he really sounded hoarse and/or like he had a cold. The concert I attended was far superior to this one; in all fairness to him he might have been a bit under the weather for the show in Russia.
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Sept 28, 2003 15:53:10 GMT
p.s dont appreciate the threat Then perhaps YOu can put yourself in OUR place briefly, as WE ALL do not appreciate YOU aggressively displaying such a rude tone to your negative,unsolicited comments about the central topic of this entire site.
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Sept 28, 2003 15:57:24 GMT
ian doubtful....about the before i was born statement but thats ok if you think that pre 1967 paul was a genius thats fine i believe it too i just believe he's still a genius i belive you must dig deep into his solo efforts to find that out also! broadst wasn't very good i do agree but the music was.. Hmmm...let's see; do I think that the sheer, timeless genius and musical complexity of 'Elainor Rigby' is better than the totality of "solo Paul' catalog? You bet I do. "Still a genius?" PAUL was a musical genius. FAUL is a clever IMPOSTER with mediocre musical/vocal ability, who has had over 30 years to perfect his persona.
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Sept 28, 2003 15:59:21 GMT
p.s dont appreciate the threat Dude, it wasn't a threat. It was a sincere, gentle SUGGESTION. And I'm not the only one who feels this way.
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Sept 28, 2003 16:11:34 GMT
let me reply to your previous post ian i have looked at this website now for months seen and heard it over and over..i didn;t scan it eitherr i went over rather thoroughlly and if i don't see eye to eye with most of you i shouldn't be ridiculed If you "don't see eye to eye" then why hang around? This site is not suppose to be an aggressive debate against the PID topic. YOU "shouldn't be ridiculed," yet you see fit to ridicule and engage us in that manner? That's kindergarden behavior. This site is for members who think PID has credence, and/or at least have an open mind/open opinion as to it's credibility. Frankly, you thru your negative postings do not fit that criteria. You revel in adversarial contention to all the postings you respond to. Quit being a pest.
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 30, 2003 19:42:53 GMT
His forehead looked abnormally large and his eyes very close together. Maybe it seemed that way to me because I am getting used to seeing what the real Paul looked like. Faul's facial traits are very obvious to me now. Strange. Darkhorse: - Debrainwashed -Welcome back to the REAL world, My Friend!
|
|