Post by IanSingleton777 on Aug 21, 2003 12:26:02 GMT
Just joined here today; went to the 'Paul is really dead" site and found just the visual comparison evidence compelling and awesome.
It is obvious that after November of 1966 that an imposter was portraying Paul McCartney. Cranial shape and measurements, eye spacing distance, ear size and placement not to mention height do NOT change in 6 months, or ever, for that matter after one is fully grown.
These changes pointed out so excellently on the web site are admissible in a court of law.
The oft-mentioned voice spectrogram we all have never changes throughout life, same as our blood type and DNA. Yet, there have been no less than THREE different Fauls identified through voice spectrum analysis.
My only remaining question is, COULD THIS ALL HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH JOHN LENNON'S ASSASSINATION? Peace, -Ian
It is obvious that after November of 1966 that an imposter was portraying Paul McCartney. Cranial shape and measurements, eye spacing distance, ear size and placement not to mention height do NOT change in 6 months, or ever, for that matter after one is fully grown.
These changes pointed out so excellently on the web site are admissible in a court of law.
The oft-mentioned voice spectrogram we all have never changes throughout life, same as our blood type and DNA. Yet, there have been no less than THREE different Fauls identified through voice spectrum analysis.
My only remaining question is, COULD THIS ALL HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH JOHN LENNON'S ASSASSINATION? Peace, -Ian
