|
|
Post by MotherNaureSon on Sept 29, 2003 10:53:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by JakesBrie on Sept 29, 2003 21:12:18 GMT
Gads, I am spending way too much time thinking about this. I know the movies were before 1966, but I could not help thinking as I watched the puff of smoke from Paul's mouth "hiding behind a smoke screen."
I think I need to relax now -- lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 29, 2003 21:36:27 GMT
Interesting that: "Faul went in playing the Fool on that French hilltop"... Why French?  |
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Sept 29, 2003 22:35:01 GMT
The Savoy Truffel?
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 29, 2003 22:43:47 GMT
LUCY, it' s really more important than we think! We are working on it because NOBODY has noticed until today that "60IF" DOES NOT tell where the kidnapping happened! |
|
|
|
Post by Imgonnaopenmymind on Sept 29, 2003 23:41:59 GMT
They filmed it in France, S.K.
Read the "faul without passport" thread. The promo is the "MMT" scene.
|
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Sept 30, 2003 0:02:10 GMT
Savoie france?
|
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Sept 30, 2003 5:26:31 GMT
 Phallic worship? I don't buy it. By 'view 3' on the site the object has taken on a wide, triangle shape more consistent with the white jacket FAUL was wearing, or the inside liner of his long wool coat, or perhaps a low-hanging winter muffler or scarf perhaps. Maybe one of the 'views' presented on that site look VAGUELY like a beatle-willy, that's about it though. Besides, it was chilly and cold there that day; one can see Faul's breath as he lip-synchs to the tune, and he's wearing a thick wool coat. His chilly willy would be...delicately put, seeking the warmth of his body and shrivling up to resemble a pink acorn, if it were exposed. (Cold does that to men's business parts ) I don't see enough evidence that he flopped his schlong out....besides, Faul was aghast when John & Yoko did the nude album cover barely a year later.....BUT, if he was on a dose of acid at the time of filming (it WAS 1967, keep in mind) ANYTHING is possible...
|
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Oct 10, 2003 5:13:01 GMT
im officially scarred for life
|
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Oct 13, 2003 12:36:38 GMT
I think we've just about got the topic of this thread licked, LOL ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by MotherNaureSon on Oct 14, 2003 7:30:23 GMT
I just had to say, when I first saw the title of this thread, my immediate thought was don't take me there..... ;D ;D I know.... But you all had to look, Didn't you? ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Oct 15, 2003 1:23:10 GMT
uhmmm....don't say, "lick."
|
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Oct 15, 2003 2:56:16 GMT
would anyone object if i were to lock this thread?
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Oct 15, 2003 4:01:13 GMT
Look, with any luck you'll lock it up with no leaks in a lake, 'cause this thread really lacks. So, don't be lax, Lech!
|
|
|
|
Post by MotherNaureSon on Oct 15, 2003 7:28:02 GMT
would anyone object if i were to lock this thread? OK, Number 9, go ahead if you want. I'm about to open a new thread: "Testicles Comparisson" (Just joking)  |
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Oct 15, 2003 11:57:28 GMT
Or how about "More balls"? ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Oct 16, 2003 0:03:04 GMT
The author of that page claims the penis is circumcised -- common procedure on infants in North America in the mid-20th century, but not in Britain, ne c'est pas?
|
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Oct 16, 2003 1:47:26 GMT
yeah i definitly think that this thread lived on long enough!
|
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Oct 17, 2003 19:00:16 GMT
alright, back by popular demand: THE MIGHTY WANG OF JUSTICE!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Oct 18, 2003 6:52:52 GMT
this is all getting to be just a bit too, well, phaullic !
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Oct 18, 2003 6:59:09 GMT
also, from an earlier post, was that a typo, or did you mean that circumcisions were going on all the time in mid 10TH CENTURY America?
I mean, whew, that's really goin' back!!!
Was this a Viking practice, or did those Hebrews really get around?
Just teasin', you must have meant 19th. Well, it is big in America. Circumcision, I mean. They snip almost all of us here and it p*sses me off. Nobody asked me! Ya' know, that's a very important little piece of tissue! I wish the doctors would figure out how we can grow it back!
|
|
|
|
Post by RitaLolo on Oct 18, 2003 12:54:14 GMT
Me I was enough to shock of this doubtful interpretation!!! that says I see not why it would do that!!! strange your history! !!!  ;D |
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Oct 24, 2003 19:52:53 GMT
I meant to type 20th-century America i.e., the 1900s.
If you're really dedicated to regrowing your little buddy's sheath, punch "foreskin restoration" into google and you should be able to find some resources . . .
Oh, yes, and there actually is some archaelogical evidence of Hebrews in pre-Columbian America. . . carvings have been discovered in Arizona and elsewhere, iirc. . .
|
|
|
|
Post by RitaLolo on Oct 25, 2003 18:16:21 GMT
Not any other photos? or one could see better? it to the air to have a big pénis Faul!!! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Oct 25, 2003 19:59:58 GMT
well, er, we already know Lennon didn't have his foreskin removed, from the 'two virgins' album cover...for what it's worth. |
|
;D