|
Post by TotalInformation on Jan 26, 2005 0:57:13 GMT
Article on the crazy police-state security surrounding Sir FAUL and the accompanying gladiatorial winter festival: www.superbowl.com/news/story/8127458and, below is the original NFL press release: www.nfl.com/news/story/7916472NFL scores Paul McCartney for Ameriquest Mortgage Super Bowl Halftime Show (Nov. 22, 2004) -- Legendary rocker Paul McCartney will perform in the Ameriquest Mortgage Super Bowl XXXIX Halftime Show on FOX at ALLTEL Stadium in Jacksonville, Fla., on Sunday, Feb. 6. We are extremely pleased to work again with Paul McCartney, one of the greatest musicians of our time, to create a memorable show," said Steve Bornstein, the NFL's executive vice president of media. Added Bornstein, who will oversee the show for the NFL: As one of the world's most beloved artists and incomparable live entertainers, Paul McCartney will deliver an inspirational performance." "There's nothing bigger then being asked to perform at the Super Bowl," said McCartney. "We're looking forward to rocking the millions at home and in the stadium." "We're thrilled billy McCartney has agreed to perform at halftime of Super Bowl XXXIX," said FOX Sports Chairman David Hill. "He is the world's most influential rock artist, and his music will forever be a part of our culture. He, more than any other musician, lives up to this year's Super Bowl theme of 'Building Bridges'. His music bridges generations, countries, cultures and musical genres. I'm also sure that the duet Paul performed with Terry Bradshaw at Super Bowl XXXVI was such a major event, that he couldn't wait to reunite with Terry in Jacksonville." This will be McCartney's second Super Bowl appearance. He provided a memorable pregame performance at Super Bowl XXXVI in New Orleans in 2002, the first Super Bowl after the tragic events of Sept. 11. As the climax to the pregame show and immediately prior to the singing of the two traditional anthems America The Beautiful" and The Star-Spangled Banner," McCartney performed Freedom," a new anthem reflecting the spirit of freedom. Watched by a record 144.4 million viewers in the U.S. last year, the Super Bowl is annually the nation's highest-rated TV program and the most-watched single-day sporting event. The game also will be broadcast in more than 200 countries worldwide. Game time is 6 p.m. ET. Emmy-award winning Don Mischer Productions will produce the Ameriquest Mortgage Super Bowl XXXIX Halftime Show starring Paul McCartney.
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Jan 30, 2005 0:04:11 GMT
[quote (Nov. 22, 2004) -- Legendary rocker Paul McCartney will perform in the Ameriquest Mortgage Super Bowl XXXIX Halftime Show on FOX at ALLTEL Stadium in Jacksonville, Fla., on Sunday, Feb. 6. We are extremely pleased to work again with Paul McCartney, one of the greatest musicians of our time, to create a memorable show," said Steve Bornstein Paul McCartney will deliver an inspirational performance.[/quote] SO...if it's at the ALLTEL stadium, he will, no doubt TELL ALL and 'create a memorable show' fer sure!
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jan 30, 2005 6:54:03 GMT
And theres not many other live events that broadcast to millions around the world that would provide such a suitable medium to reveal his sordid secrets!
However I have a feeling that we shouldnt get our hopes up too much, I reckon ritchie and faul will take it to their graves, and then somehow it will be revealed so they dont have to face it themselves.
We can only speculate unless we can reveal the secrets ourselves-take the decision out of their hands.
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jan 30, 2005 7:39:34 GMT
Revelations. At the Super Bowl?
Well, we had that last year, didn't we? And it was a little too much "revelation" for most of us.........
So, no, no pull of the "mask" in 2005, IMO. JUst good music, and an exciting half-time act. But, I imagine (with a giggle) that billy might quip:
"So, in case you are wondering, ladies and gentlemen, I must let you in on a little something. And, that is, that I have nothing to get off my chest this evening! Aren't you relieved?!
I guess I am bit droll; but he might as break the ice about the "stigma" still dangling from last year's display... by Miss Jackson. McCartney can get still away with a veiled remark. After all, Janet and he might not be "bosom buddies." (I presume?...) As far as Michael Jackson, I won't touch that.........
So also, I dunno--maybe Janet owes us all "a-nip-ology". [Say it fast; I take no prisoners.]
As for people here, or any other website group goes, I don't think that anyone can make this matter their own to publicize--no offense, plasticpaul, but I don't think it is a thing that will be shown or can make sense or even seem believable to people in general. Plus, it becomes a whole debate about legalities, entertainment law, public perception, and personal credibility. This topic, going out the gate, loans little credibility to the espouser, as I have found.
I think it's grand to discuss it, and speculate, and compare Beatle artifacts (makes me feel old to use that word) and materials until the cows come home.
I think any plan to "tear the veil" would fall flat, or be thwarted, actually, and besides, I think Ritchie and billy as a matter of course deserve to finish out what was begun to the last without further incident. THey are are elders. They made a curious choice, for I think understandable reasons, and the world should let 'em have it. I mean, in a good way.
Now, their children were never really a part of it. But, don't you know they'd resent the public questioning it all. I mean, of course they would. It's hard to guess what they might "know", or "believe" about it.
I believe the status quo will maintain. Likewise, over here in this discreet corner, I think our study and conjecture will go on. To what end? To analyze for our own use. To learn about circumstances, fate, motivations, discipline, determination, achieving a stated result, technical advancement as necessity, and that even the upper crust have to put one leg at a time in their pants at a time like we do.
[Though I've heard rumours that the rich are closing in on a research project that will make putting on one's clothes instantaneous. Lots of velcro involved.....]
For me, I'll always think the thing was done to (1) preserve a British economic asset, and (2) moreso, to avert a potentially wide reaching shock for teens: the trauma of finding out a beloved Fab was killed, or died. Who could measure the impact? Alive, the Beatles caused panic attacks! Pandemonium! Kids were so excited about their music! They had to be made to go on without a problem, without the bad news. The adults, yes, could have handled knowing. It was done for the kids, and many parents would be grateful, if they understood this fully, for it. Even parents who detested the Fabs would not have wanted the traumas. Every school child would have been depressed, let down, cried, hysterical.
Because that is precisely what happened when Kennedy died. I was in first grade in November of 1963. The annoucement came over the intercom, and all 30 kids in my classroom burst into tears, screaming no, no, etc. We were all sent home early. For several days the national mood was grim. The country was down--we kids were down, scared, worried. how could this happen?
Nobody wanted a repeat performance--that promised to have a bigger reactioin, and worldwide.
They did not trust us to be able to handle McCartney's death.
I think this looked to "them" like the best way to intervene. JMO.
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Jan 30, 2005 14:05:08 GMT
We can only speculate unless we can reveal the secrets ourselves-take the decision out of their hands. Like any other GREAT revelation.
|
|
|
Post by Jilli on Jan 30, 2005 14:07:55 GMT
I get it...its the "Fool on the Hill Bowl"
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Jan 30, 2005 14:57:22 GMT
Actually a strong message was already sent. THE KING IS NAKED! Sun King shouted. LET IT BE... NAKED "THEY" replied. But.... don't care about all the other people involved in "Dig It"...
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jan 30, 2005 17:23:13 GMT
Not to be picky or anything, but the photo of PAUL with the pole going down the center to hide his privates ( from the White Album Poster ) IS PAUL, not FAUL. Just look at his turned leg & compare it to other photos of PAUL where his leg is turned. It sure looks like the same leg to me ! Paul was a smaller man than Faul, with a smaller build.
|
|
|
Post by JamesPaul & Brian on Jan 31, 2005 1:00:31 GMT
Actually a strong message was already sent. THE KING IS NAKED! Sun King shouted. LET IT BE... NAKED "THEY" replied. But.... don't care about all the other people involved in "Dig It"... Exactly. Expose "Faul" alone and everyone else is covered. It's enough to throw the public off balance. No one would know what to think. Crying for answers...they can be told more lies... Good way to keep everyone confused...while "they" keep making their moves...
|
|
|
Post by unrepentant on Jan 31, 2005 3:54:54 GMT
hello james paul and brian....
what if faul announces his true identity during or immediately after the game?
i think it would be a golden opportunity for improving the world, if seized upon by the right people that is.
when there is mass confusion, everyone looks for that someone to show the way......well, i think "the way" after bill is exposed would be to realize we are all HUMAN, and that being human equals being easily fooled. if we could be staring at a naked king for 30 years and not know it, there is no denying that....
so maybe we can forgive ourselves and each other and then echo the words of lennon from now on....JUST GIVE ME TRUTH!! ALL I WANT IS THE TRUTH!!!
no more mama's little chauvenists!!
|
|
|
Post by beatled on Jan 31, 2005 4:01:25 GMT
Exactly. Expose "Faul" alone and everyone else is covered. It's enough to throw the public off balance. No one would know what to think. Crying for answers...they can be told more lies... Good way to keep everyone confused...while "they" keep making their moves... I had a similar thought on occasion, when a distraction might be needed that would trump any and all other distractions... In case of emergency, break (Paul was replaced) glass..
|
|
|
Post by JamesPaul & Brian on Jan 31, 2005 21:05:54 GMT
hello james paul and brian.... what if faul announces his true identity during or immediately after the game? i think it would be a golden opportunity for improving the world, if seized upon by the right people that is. when there is mass confusion, everyone looks for that someone to show the way......well, i think "the way" after bill is exposed would be to realize we are all HUMAN, and that being human equals being easily fooled. if we could be staring at a naked king for 30 years and not know it, there is no denying that.... so maybe we can forgive ourselves and each other and then echo the words of lennon from now on....JUST GIVE ME TRUTH!! ALL I WANT IS THE TRUTH!!! no more mama's little chauvenists!! You are right my friend. It could change EVERYTHING...
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jan 31, 2005 21:43:32 GMT
Of course everyone who "believes" (myself included) would love Faul to reveal himself, but why would he?
Could it be that he is tired of all the pretence surrounding his life, well no, i find it hard to believe that he would announce it to the world.
Revealing the drama and circumstance would ruin him. People would despise him for lying for all these years, they would no longer trust him, it wouldnt surprise me thatpeople would have mass burnings of his solo albums like when the beatles themselves were in manilla (i think thats right?). Maybe people would want to murder him, as a tribute to the real paul- to avenge his death, who knows?
One thing's for sure, it would require a brave man to make this decision like it would have done all those years ago in 66, but they didn't do it then why would he now?
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jan 31, 2005 21:45:31 GMT
unfortunately, plastic paul is probably right
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Feb 1, 2005 10:07:28 GMT
Dubious expectations there. I dont think so.
I think it would need more research and study, as far as approaching anything like that idea. Like, "test marketing" or something. You couldn't just go kablam guess what. It would take some leading up to, preparation, getting the idea ready, or people ready for the idea. I have big doubts about whether the "powers that be" at EMI or in official British affairs would cotton to this idea.
Seems like it probably would have come with the "Death to Schmootchie" clause that suppoedely John mentions in TKIN!
That's a perturbing idea. I guess it would have everything to do with classifid, military, sensitive, etc.
I don't guess they'd ever bend just one time on this kind of issue?? Cut some slack on secrecy?
Imagine if they had chose the other path? Put it on the news, announced it, said, "Sorry Kids, Paul is Dead. Details at 11."
Would there be MORE anger now, finding out that we were so protected (from the trauma)< or how angry would 140 million American households have become at England? The music industry? The surviving Beatles?
Then, there's the whole Brian thing.....
I think there are too many dominos........
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Feb 1, 2005 11:58:23 GMT
Dubious expectations there. I dont think so. I think it would need more research and study, as far as approaching anything like that idea. Like, "test marketing" or something. You couldn't just go kablam guess what. It would take some leading up to, preparation, getting the idea ready, or people ready for the idea. I have big doubts about whether the "powers that be" at EMI or in official British affairs would cotton to this idea. Seems like it probably would have come with the "Death to Schmootchie" clause that suppoedely John mentions in TKIN! That's a perturbing idea. I guess it would have everything to do with classifid, military, sensitive, etc. I don't guess they'd ever bend just one time on this kind of issue?? Cut some slack on secrecy? Imagine if they had chose the other path? Put it on the news, announced it, said, "Sorry Kids, Paul is Dead. Details at 11." Would there be MORE anger now, finding out that we were so protected (from the trauma)< or how angry would 140 million American households have become at England? The music industry? The surviving Beatles? Then, there's the whole Brian thing..... I think there are too many dominos........ That's the reality but.... I was wondering about those words: "I urge everyone to follow the path. It may be long and winding but it has been generously bordered with candles (I'd rather say halogen spotlights, but candles sounds so much more poetic, n'est pas?) by our friend Sun King.
You can't go astray. Just follow the path that has been prepared for you and you will find the source of truth.
It's straight ahead. Never give up. Warriors of the lost one." At: 60if.proboards21.com/index.cgi?board=Essential&action=display&thread=1098612008
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Feb 1, 2005 12:04:20 GMT
If this is the way to think, fine. But, we're gonna need a busload of batteries.
Wanted: Seeking the "Energizer" bunny.
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Feb 2, 2005 17:49:02 GMT
I wish he would just fess up & get it out in the open. Then we can all just pack up & go home Wishful thinking, I guess
|
|
|
Post by unrepentant on Feb 3, 2005 22:44:35 GMT
do CDs even B U R N ;D as a longtime record junkie i never burned any of my records.....i've accidentally heat-warped them, but never set fire to them... i wonder what a melted lump of burned first-press beatles records would fetch on Ebay?? hey-- just for the hell of it, someone tape the halftime show, okay?? here's another clue for you all: LAST YEAR's "big thing" was janet jackson "exposing" something he was "holding in" all those years....could it have been a little prelude to a much bigger "coming out" this year??
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Feb 4, 2005 16:12:33 GMT
If we were fortunate to have Faul "expose himself"..that is admit the truth after all these years..it would fantastic, but he has enjoyed the fame, the money, etc. He ain't going to give it up until the haul him out feet first. He obviously doesn't give a rat's ass about Paul getting his proper acknowledgment.
Every time that jerk opens his mouth to sing I want to throw up. Heard sing or mess up "I've Just Seen a Face" and "Here, There, and Everywhere". He can't sing them correctly; no surprise, there not his. He does okay with "his" songs, but screws Paul's up probably on purpose.
I am afraid we're asking for too much to have the bastard confess at the Super Bowl.
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Feb 5, 2005 1:58:55 GMT
Rumored songs:
Drive My Car Get Back Live and Let Die Let It Be
Hey Jude Do you want to know a secret?
Can't be more than four... probably those first four.
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Feb 5, 2005 2:16:24 GMT
One more time for the newbies before the Super Bowl begins this weekend. Click on the link in Joe Star's post.
|
|
|
Post by unrepentant on Feb 5, 2005 5:14:28 GMT
BUT, it's still a tantalizing possibility. the idea behind my "irrational exuberance" is, the same powers that be who replaced paul and marred history might want to finally play their PID card just BECAUSE it would blow so many minds at the same time. what would be a better smokescreen for a major NWO move, possibly in the middle east? people wouldn't know which way was up! people are in a very suggestive state of mind at such times.
|
|
|
Post by JamesPaul & Brian on Feb 5, 2005 5:44:32 GMT
...the same powers that be who replaced paul and marred history might want to finally play their PID card just BECAUSE it would blow so many minds at the same time Exactly. That could really be the "final" goal...as planned from the start...
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Feb 5, 2005 6:24:56 GMT
Weather-control tech set for Super Bowl www.libertythink.com/2005/02/weather-control-tech-set-for-super.html The man who calls himself billy MCCARTNEY gave a press conference Thursday about his performance at the Super Bowl on Sunday. From the EDMONTON SUN February 4, 2005: www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/EdmontonSun/Entertainment/2005/02/04/920320-sun.html Before McCartney entered the room, the media was informed that no personal questions would be taken and that all questions should be related to the Super Bowl. [...] He had only one prediction for the game in this city, which has seen nothing but cold and rain since the teams arrived here Sunday. "It will not rain. It will not. I know these things." How does he know these things? Easy. He's had the skies part for him before. From The Guardian [UK] June 24, 2004: www.guardian.co.uk/life/thisweek/story/0,12977,1245511,00.html When his 3,000th concert in St Petersburg's Palace Square was threatened by poor weather, his concert promoters promised that the sun would be shining by the time McCartney took to the stage. A Moscow company, SAV Entertainments, arranged for three jets to streak over the pregnant skies, dumping vast quantities of dry ice, or frozen carbon dioxide, as they went. By doing so, they hoped to "lock" the rain into the clouds, ensuring a dry spell over the city. According to McCartney's spokesman, Geoff Baker, who was at the concert, the £20,000 plan worked a treat. "It was pissing down beforehand and then it became so sunny that Brian Ray, the guitarist, had to get one of his roadies to fetch his shades," he says. The idea of cloud seeding, as the technique is known, is simple and dates back to the 1940s when some believed that to control the weather would be to control the world. [...] You may recall the last time this guy played the Super Bowl, in 2002. With the trauma of September 11 still fresh, Her Majesty's knight, this agent of the British Crown, delivered an Orwellian anthem not-so-subtly equating "Freedom" with the so-called "War on Terror." Related story (Feb. 3): Awareness of Paul McCartney death, cover-up on rise www.total411.info/2005/02/awareness-of-paul-mccartney-death.html
|
|