|
|
Post by verachuckanddave on Jan 18, 2005 4:55:30 GMT
Please check and post the pictures from (Im really bad to handle this)  geocities.com/cacaorock/revisiones/revinsidepaulsbrain.htmlThe pic#4 from a beatle fanzine circa 1965/66 IS NOT PAUL (Maybe a winner from a lookalike contest)  The pic #3 shows a short Paul (not longer than Faul) and the#2 is a funny inside image of Faul´s brain ;D Pablo esta muerto |
|
|
|
Post by Jilli on Jan 18, 2005 11:22:00 GMT
You are right that isnt Paul and I dont think its Faul either.
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jan 18, 2005 12:43:39 GMT
Not Paul, and not Faul. It must be "Naul."
ba-dum-bump.
But, seriously folks, that was an interested and bizarre read. Thanks for posting.
Some of the photos were not available, to either deep-linking or what have you.
I dunno. When the archeaologists find a giant cache of Beatles-McCartney material in a dig, a thousand years from now, after some considered study, they may conclude from all the photographic material that "Paul McCartney" was a collection of several people.
But, it won't matter then to all those walking, talking intelligent holograms. They'll change their looks with the push of a button, or installing a new RAM card into their head.
-Data
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jan 18, 2005 16:53:16 GMT
Vera & Perplexed - which photo do you guys think isn't Paul? The one of the Mersey Beat cover ? I have that photo. I'm pretty sure that S.K. posted that photo a long time ago & it IS Paul. I also have the photo on the record sleve from Yesterday & Act Naturally . I have posted it previously to try to show that Paul wasn't much taller than Ritchie. If Ritchie was wearing heels & Paul wasn't, there was maybe an inch or two difference  So you're right Vera, Paul WAS small ! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on Jan 18, 2005 21:33:15 GMT
I think that his face looks weird, but that's probably cause we always saw Paul smile with his mouth open  |
|
Pat
Contributor
Posts: 69
|
Post by Pat on Jan 19, 2005 2:22:25 GMT
aer you guys talking about this picture?  I thought this was a VERY interesting picture... does anyone know where it came from? |
|
|
|
Post by verachuckanddave on Jan 19, 2005 3:59:24 GMT
I think that pic come from his own financial team. ;D
Seriously , I don´t know , but the guy knows very well Faul.
Pablo esta muerto.
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jan 19, 2005 4:34:16 GMT
Like, a magazine counter? Like in the drug store? Or department store? How can you be sure they've ever even met? Footprints? Lipstick on the mirror? A broken branch? The engine was still warm? Roger. Over and out. |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jan 19, 2005 16:32:00 GMT
TPI - I agree. Paul does look strange in that photo on the Mersey Beat cover. I tried to determine what year it was on the stands. When I blew it up, it looked like it might be sometime in 1964, which means it was Paul.
I want to go to the Mersey Beat website when I get the chance & see if they have the different issues available to see the different covers on them.
If I find anything else out, I will let you know.
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jan 20, 2005 4:46:10 GMT
aer you guys talking about this picture? I thought this was a VERY interesting picture... does anyone know where it came from? It does kinda grow on you. Fascinating. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Jan 20, 2005 11:27:10 GMT
Quite possibly they've modified the cover? If you had the original, you might see a difference.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jan 20, 2005 15:29:41 GMT
P.B. that is a good possibility. I have to go & check out that Mersey Beat site. On that brain thing, they have written Paul is dead on the bottom. I find THAT fascinating !
|
|
geocities.com/cacaorock/revisiones/revinsidepaulsbrain.html
