|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Jun 18, 2005 22:40:42 GMT
I can't read about it
burns the skin from your eyes
I'll do fine without it
here's one you don't compromise
Lies come hard to disguise
Let me to fight it out--
not wild about it
Lay your seedy judgements
who says they're part of our lives?
you own the money
you control the witness
I hear you're lonely
don't monkey with my business
You pay the profits to justify the reasons
I heard your promise
but I don't believe it
that's why I'll do it again
no no notorious
Girls will keep the secrets
so long as boys make the noise
Fools run rings to break up
something they'll never destroy
Grand notorious slam--
BAM!
and who really gives a damn
for a flaky bandit?
don't ask me to bleed about it
I need this blood to survive
you own the money
you control the witness
I hear you're lonely
don't monkey with my business
You pay the profits to justify the reasons
I heard your promise
but I don't believe it
that's why I'll do it again
|
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Jun 19, 2005 17:00:45 GMT
Did you write this BP?
|
|
|
|
Post by beatled on Jun 19, 2005 18:25:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jun 27, 2005 4:56:12 GMT
I would just like to hear Bill "fess" up. Even if he upsets the "Men in Black", he has made them billions. He has done their bidding for so long that you's think they might let him come forward and tell the truth before he dies. We all know Bill is 70, not 63. I am no religious nut, but I don't think I would care to be in Bill's shoes when it's time for him to cross over into the light or maybe the fiery red?   |
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Jul 4, 2005 14:49:43 GMT
Then if we're so serious about this, why don't we write an open letter to Faul? We'll state what we know, what we have yet to figure out, and include some of our evidence. We'll ask him to come clean. If he doesn't, then he doesn't. If he does, we have one of the biggest media scoops of the 21st century.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jul 4, 2005 18:54:31 GMT
I wonder if Bill is afraid he will meet the same fate as Lady Di. The Crown has to be involved for it to have gone on this long and some have said Bill is nothing more than a paid employee.
However, since he is 70+ and not 63, and he is getting closer and closer to the day he will meet his maker, I would think he'd want to confess. He needs to be sure that he "has insurance" before coming clean, however.
He will not go happily because there will those waiting for him.....George and John......who can hardly wait to get their hands on him. He screwed too many people and no one is happy about his representation of Paul. It would seem logical that once you cross over you will meet up with those you have wronged.
Bill is more than welcome to come forward and Iwould give him a chance to explain but I would want the right to ask questions, too. If Bill ever wants to do the right thing, we'd give him a chance. He is versed on computers and could e-mail or IM any of us....and he knows it.
|
|
|
|
Post by faul ramone on Jul 5, 2005 2:23:12 GMT
if paul is 70 he sure looks good!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jul 5, 2005 13:55:01 GMT
He looks awful 99.9% of the time unless a photo was airbrushed. He is old and pruny......ugh!!!!
This faker is older than Paul would have been had he not be murdered. Bill was born in the 1930's and Paul was born in 1942
Old prune face probably can't get any more plastic surgery because he had way too much already!
|
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Jul 5, 2005 14:26:38 GMT
if paul is 70 he sure looks good!!! Well FAUL looked about 60 at Live 8. |
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Jul 5, 2005 18:55:29 GMT
I"d peg him at 68. He keeps himself healthy. But it looked like he had a fair amount of pancake makeup on that Live 8 finale.
|
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Jul 7, 2005 21:59:42 GMT
He looks about the same age. In fact, I'd say that he'd have to be the same age as Paul for a good amount of the cover-up to work. Age cannot be covered up with makeup permanently. If he is older, it will really show. It doesn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jul 9, 2005 0:34:31 GMT
Yeh, whatever his real age is, he doesnt look ancient by any means, 65 is the oldest i'd put him at judging by his looks. He still seems to be able to play instruments and move around like any other person, he isn't excessively wrinkly, he doesn't have a shaky voice, he is still tall and doesn't have any "hunch" type thing, nor does he have age marks on his skin.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jul 9, 2005 3:49:28 GMT
May he is still having injections or touch up plastic surgery. And he DOES look old! Old pruny.........and he is a vegan which means he isn't eating some of the foods that his body needs. Someone posted once about that but I can remember where.
|
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jul 9, 2005 23:13:37 GMT
Ok he is wrinkly but people age differently of course, my old man looks no older than his age (57) yet he has noticable wrinkles, maybe he would be regarded as "pruny" to you, but that doesnt make you 70 years old.
This sounds like i am a PIAer but i feel that you cannot compare someone with nothing. We have no idea how JPM would appear today as a 63 year old...
|
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Jul 18, 2005 12:38:08 GMT
Again, this thread gave me the idea. Somebody should compose an open letter to Faul outlining the theory, the evidence we have so far, and the angles we don't understand. We all sign it with our real names, or at least real pseudonyms that can't be traced to us. We get it published in several places online and in international newspapers. We draw up a shitstorm of publicity, slowly closing in around him, until he finally breaks down and confesses to us.
|
|
Dr.No
Contributor
Posts: 177
|
Post by Dr.No on Jul 18, 2005 16:02:18 GMT
Again, this thread gave me the idea. Somebody should compose an open letter to Faul outlining the theory, the evidence we have so far, and the angles we don't understand. We all sign it with our real names, or at least real pseudonyms that can't be traced to us. We get it published in several places online and in international newspapers. We draw up a sh*tstorm of publicity, slowly closing in around him, until he finally breaks down and confesses to us. are ~200+ people enough to gain international attention? |
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jul 18, 2005 22:58:00 GMT
The fact that the press are probably clued in and told not to mention PID, i doubt 200,000 is good enough, sadly!
Still i like the idea, yet know it's nigh on impossible.
|
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Jul 21, 2005 0:38:18 GMT
It depends, my dear friend Jon. As we get closer and closer to our goal, we will gain in numbers. There's strength in numbers.
|
|
Dr.No
Contributor
Posts: 177
|
Post by Dr.No on Jul 21, 2005 2:52:48 GMT
It depends, my dear friend Jon. As we get closer and closer to our goal, we will gain in numbers. There's strength in numbers. .......yeah, thats what I was getting at. |
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Jul 21, 2005 3:10:15 GMT
Again, this thread gave me the idea. Somebody should compose an open letter to Faul outlining the theory, the evidence we have so far, and the angles we don't understand. We all sign it with our real names, or at least real pseudonyms that can't be traced to us. We get it published in several places online and in international newspapers. We draw up a sh*tstorm of publicity, slowly closing in around him, until he finally breaks down and confesses to us. Fools run rings to break up something they'll never destroy (from the lyrics at the top of this thread!) He hasn't been trying to hide it. |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jul 21, 2005 13:21:22 GMT
Fools run rings to break up Something that they'll never destroy. You seem to find that stanza important Byrds. I interpret it to mean Fools - meaning us - run rings - this Forum & others like it - to break up something that they'll never destroy - to stop the lies & to destroy the falsehood that is Faul. However we will never destroy that falsehood. That's what I think it means  |
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Jul 22, 2005 0:07:54 GMT
Well, I didn't mean it quite as severely as that.
I was thinking more that we'd be fools if we thought we
could force Faul into doing anything. More than that, I
don't think we need to.
When I read this:
"Again, this thread gave me the idea. Somebody should compose an open letter to Faul outlining the theory, the evidence we have so far, and the angles we don't understand. We all sign it with our real names, or at least real pseudonyms"
I thought PC was suggesting a sincere but cordial inquiry to Faul, but then when I read this:
"We draw up a sh*tstorm of publicity, slowly closing in around him, until he finally breaks down and confesses to us."
I realized that what was being suggested was kind of
a hostile maneuver which, of course, would make him disinclined to co-operate.
I think we would be fools if we approacched Faul in a hostile way. He probably has more connections than even the Pope. The lyrics seemed appropriate.
|
|
