|
Post by Forum Manager on Jul 29, 2003 23:27:35 GMT
i think if people knew that 60IF was written by george harrison, then they would be more likely to believe it. so i was wondering if u thought it was a good idea to mention on my site that 60IF was written by him. what do u think?
|
|
|
Post by joejoe on Jul 30, 2003 3:18:11 GMT
Do we know he was the author? If we post a statement like that and can't back it up, we lose all credibility.
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Jul 30, 2003 5:47:36 GMT
Sun_King has now confirmed this. When I get round to it (I need a break, this stuff keeps going around in my head) I'll put it in the FAQ that I'm going to compile.
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Jul 30, 2003 14:07:25 GMT
i think if people knew that 60IF was written by george harrison, then they would be more likely to believe it. so i was wondering if u thought it was a good idea to mention on my site that 60IF was written by him. what do u think? Yes, you can. Better: "written from George Harrison dictation" but "there was" John too...
|
|
|
Post by Rojopa on Jul 31, 2003 21:00:56 GMT
Sun-King: So what you are saying is that George Harrison is the author of 60if? To me that would make sense since he knew he didn't have alot of time left on this planet. My question is: Why didn't he sign his name?
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Aug 3, 2003 21:11:27 GMT
my question is, how was john involved?
|
|
|
Post by krysia on Aug 3, 2003 21:14:42 GMT
how do we KNOW for a fact that it was written by him?
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Aug 3, 2003 21:16:15 GMT
well all we know is that sun king says so
|
|
|
Post by krysia on Aug 3, 2003 21:20:23 GMT
well, how does he know? its not like i dont trust him, because i really do, its just that i want to know how he knows, because maybe if he tells us how he knows, we can come up with something else.
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 7, 2003 12:20:44 GMT
Well, "60IF" brought me to the Truth. And the Truth is that: "James Paul McCartney and Brian Epstein were replaced in fall 1966" "60IF" gave me the directions to the "legal value" comparisons too. All that started with "60IF". If all true or not REALLY it doesn't matter now.
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 7, 2003 14:44:33 GMT
Dear Jae, here my answers: 1) Yes (of course!) 2) Before receiving "60IF" I DID know NOTHING about Beatles story then... Noone has never heard something like that before then... 3) No..probably "they" conducted it themselves.. 4) Probably an italian journalist. George at that time went in Italy...then it was translated in nepalese. 5) Yes 6) Oh yeah! (very good question!) It was published for the first time on 18th of June 2002. Do you know... Congratulations Jae! One of the most interesting post I ever read!
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 8, 2003 9:29:46 GMT
Ok - George passed away 29/11/01. Sun King - would you be good enough to answer a couple more of my questions? 1) Did 60IF plan the revelation so that it would begin to see the light of day after his death? 2)Had revealing the info in this way at the end of his life been something he was planning for several years? 1) Just perfect! 2) Just perfect! Congratuations again Jae!
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 8, 2003 9:54:54 GMT
Sun King - just interested to know your opinion - if there had been an attempt on 60IF's life, might it have been connected with his plans regarding this revelation? Absolutely YES!
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 8, 2003 10:04:09 GMT
ok... - at any time, did 60IF consider releasing the information while he was still alive? Probably...but the BEST way was indeed through "60IF" and its "legal value" animated gifs. Hard to replicate on a paper sheet....
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 8, 2003 10:14:18 GMT
I asked this in another thread and hope you don't mind me repeating - the name of the legal corpse recognition process, demonstrated by Uberkinder, is not known professionally as '60IF'? Noone in forensics refers to it informally as that, right? Hey!!! "Uberkinder site" was DERIVED from "60IF" NOT vice-versa! Do you know...?
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 8, 2003 10:19:43 GMT
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 8, 2003 10:24:04 GMT
60 IF! 60 IF! It's not that the information was to be released on Paul's sixtieth birthday, but that it was to be released on what would have been his sixtieth, if he had lived. And that is why all this is coming out now! Look at the '60if' in the URL! George wanted this story told now! That was perfect from you!
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 8, 2003 10:29:51 GMT
Thank You, Jae!
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 8, 2003 10:35:00 GMT
18th of June 2002
"60IF" document was published on the Internet.
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 8, 2003 10:50:01 GMT
excuse me! 200 2. do you think the intelligence services would have gotten wind of "60IF"'s plans to go public with the information? I think: no! If "yes" "60IF" never went out!
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 8, 2003 14:27:29 GMT
Oh, this is really an interview! Only revealing the truth for ALL THE Beatles' TRUE FANS.
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 9, 2003 14:24:36 GMT
1) Yes 2) "60IF" is Faul's worst nightmare!
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 9, 2003 14:41:42 GMT
Jae, on the RIGHT way!
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Aug 9, 2003 21:37:05 GMT
wow, im liking this discussion, it is answering many questions. lemme take it from where jae left off. so then what do you think george was trying to accomplish by staying at faul's house?
|
|
|
Post by kane1000 on Aug 14, 2003 3:00:50 GMT
all i can say is God bless john and george.............
|
|