|
|
Post by Quarryman on Nov 27, 2003 1:49:34 GMT
At the link I provide, there are some GREAT photos of the Beatles. To me, they all look like the REAL Paul McCartney. Seeing as this was the Sgt Pepper session, how can this be? Is it the opinion of this board that all these photos were retouched? Wouldn't that be a mind-boggling task? www.nemsworld.com/beatles/67pp/party.htm |
|
|
|
Post by Quarryman on Nov 27, 2003 2:04:05 GMT
Here's an interesting one. Anyone want to do body comparisons with early Paul shirtless photos?  |
|
|
|
Post by Quarryman on Nov 27, 2003 2:13:01 GMT
The more I look at this site, the more I think I am seeing the real Paul McCartney. Go to this link for their final photo session, where the supposed "Beatles posing where Paul is buried" photo is. You get to see the previous photos and there is text explaining what was going on. www.nemsworld.com/beatles/tit/tit.htmDon't worry. That's not a porno link or something. These are the pictures taken at Tittenhurst! |
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Nov 27, 2003 3:02:10 GMT
Sorry Quarryman, but the only picture that really looks to me like Paul is the very first one on the left where they're sitting on the steps, and evidently that's a happy coincidence, because all the rest look like somebody else to me, especially the one in your second post!
|
|
|
|
Post by Fwings on Nov 27, 2003 8:04:00 GMT
Sorry, but I don't think they look like the real Paul either. They don't even appear to be retouched... all I can see is Faul, Faul, and more Faul.
|
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Nov 27, 2003 8:40:08 GMT
All Faul, all the time...
|
|
|
|
Post by ZioMarco on Nov 27, 2003 9:33:26 GMT
I agree, they're all Faul's pictures for me too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Nov 28, 2003 13:48:00 GMT
  I have to agree with the Quarryman. All Faul, all the time. Paul had a very straight up & down shape. Narrow shoulders, no waist or hips. Here's a perfect example of this :  Very cute, but of a small build ;D ;D ;D In that photo of Bill ( Faul ), it's very obvious that he has wide shoulders & a small waist... Also, in those photos he looks much older then he should look in his twenties !!! ;D ;D ;D Love to all... Chris 
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Nov 28, 2003 13:50:21 GMT
OOOPPSS!!!! I wrote agree with the Quarryman, when I meant agree with THEM Quarryman. Forgot my M... Sorry !!!! Love to all... Chris   |
|
|
|
Post by swvlhed on Nov 29, 2003 2:44:14 GMT
Without knowing it, Quarryman has stumbled onto something here. These photos are and are not those of James Paul McCartney. Can a man be two places at once? No.
But can a man wear two faces at once?
Certainly no one is overlooking that the shirtless photo of young "Paul" has him miming guitar right-handed, correct?
The truth is staring you in the face. And looking right through you.
Study the beginnings, you'd be surprised what you will find...
|
|
|
|
Post by Quarryman on Nov 29, 2003 19:14:50 GMT
Swvlhed,
What the hell does that mean?
|
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Nov 29, 2003 22:29:47 GMT
I think Faul and Paul look very much alike.
In the beginning for me it was always difficult to tell them apart unless their faces were compared in the same manner as on Sun King's site. But you can always tell the difference in the shape of the face.
Remember, Paul had a round face and Bill has a long face. The long face is evident in all of those photos. Also notice how Faul towers over the others in the Sgt. Pepper photo shoot. At that time they weren't as clever about the hiding the height difference. It must have escaped their attention because they were focused so much on Faul's face. In the later pictures it is well disguised.
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Nov 29, 2003 23:46:27 GMT
;DLongJohn- of course you may. I hope it helps us get to the truth of this whole mess. And it IS a mess. A 37 year old cold-case file without a body. It's NOT going to be easy to prove. Bill does have the upper hand, just by the virtue of his staying power. It's almost like he's become the ultimate squatter !!!! His work stinks for the most part. He does have a few good songs. Who's to say if he wrote them himself  Maybe, he's just become one of the world's best performance artists... Love to all... Chris |
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Nov 30, 2003 10:06:47 GMT
Certainly no one is overlooking that the shirtless photo of young "Paul" has him miming guitar right-handed, correct? The photo could simply be flipped. |
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Nov 30, 2003 22:22:30 GMT
Without knowing it, Quarryman has stumbled onto something here. These photos are and are not those of James Paul McCartney. Can a man be two places at once? No. But can a man wear two faces at once? Certainly no one is overlooking that the shirtless photo of young "Paul" has him miming guitar right-handed, correct? The truth is staring you in the face. And looking right through you. Study the beginnings, you'd be surprised what you will find... .....just thought I'd throw this in here........ balder.prohosting.com/fabgear/sgt/pepper1.html#1Sri Yukteswar Giri (guru, 1855-1936) Born on May 10, 1855 as Priya Nath Karar, he became known as Swami Sri Yukteswar Giri when he joined the Swami Order after the death of his wife. Giri was Lahiri Mahasaya's disciple and the Guru of Paramahansa Yogananda. He wrote "The Holy Science", a book that underlines the unity between the Scriptures of Christianity and the Hindu scriptures, and trained Paramahansa Yogananda for his spiritual world-mission: the dissemination of Kriya Yoga. It has been reported that he displayed an ability to miraculously appear in two places simultaneously. He was also said to have predicted his own passing, left his body at death and resurrected into a new body. Sri Yukteswar Giri is also known as Jnanavatar which means means "Incarnation of Wisdom". |
|
|
|
Post by Quarryman on Dec 1, 2003 2:29:47 GMT
I noticed something on uberkinder's site. Look closely at this picture from the Eye Comparison page. It is of James Paul McCartney, showing his brown eyes (which I contend are actually hazel, judging from the picture). But never mind that. Look above his lip. The U-shaped white scar is already there. You can see it plain as day, but uberkinder points it out in the Hey Jude video shot (also below). What is going on? Did James Paul already have that scar? Was uberkinder given a false photo for an early Paul photo?   |
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Dec 1, 2003 4:26:31 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Dec 1, 2003 6:22:52 GMT
I noticed something on uberkinder's site. Look closely at this picture from the Eye Comparison page. It is of James Paul McCartney, showing his brown eyes (which I contend are actually hazel, judging from the picture). But never mind that. Look above his lip. The U-shaped white scar is already there. You can see it plain as day, but uberkinder points it out in the Hey Jude video shot (also below). What is going on? Did James Paul already have that scar? Was uberkinder given a false photo for an early Paul photo? |
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Dec 1, 2003 6:24:39 GMT
Look above his lip. The U-shaped white scar is already there. You can see it plain as day, but uberkinder points it out in the Hey Jude video shot (also below). What is going on? Did James Paul already have that scar? Was uberkinder given a false photo for an early Paul photo? looks more like bad lighting and no pancake that day  |
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Dec 1, 2003 6:29:56 GMT
[/img]  [/quote] I say it's a good make-up job (can you see the outline of his real lips?) possible negative tampering |
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Dec 1, 2003 7:10:32 GMT
I say it's a good make-up job (can you see the outline of his real lips?) possible negative tampering there also looks like enough paraffin on his face to stand in for the real one at Madam's. |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Dec 1, 2003 8:30:49 GMT
 Still checked but here is SO evident: neither the upper lip scar doesn't match (the Faul's one is more central)! JoJo: you have BOOM material in your hands....like any other genuine vintage Beatles' collector.... |
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Dec 1, 2003 13:42:03 GMT
Lucy & S.K. - is it my imagination, or is the space above Billy's upper lip larger then Paul's was It seems so to me in the two photos that you're comparing here !!! I can't make out any scars in those photos. You guys have great eyes !!! Love to all... Chris ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by JamesPaul & Brian on Dec 1, 2003 17:18:01 GMT
 Chris, you are right. Because Faul's nose was shrinked by the "magicians" in their secret labs. Faul just like Pinocchio? ;D |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Dec 1, 2003 22:56:06 GMT
|
|
I have to agree with the Quarryman. All Faul, all the time. Paul had a very straight up & down shape. Narrow shoulders, no waist or hips. Here's a perfect example of this :
Maybe, he's just become one of the world's best performance artists...
