|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Jan 23, 2006 18:57:22 GMT
Eric Clapton, THE TRUE one. |
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jan 23, 2006 23:43:42 GMT
BP, whenever you post these things, you need to show the two original photos, and then the fade or combo, that way people can make a better opinion of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Jan 24, 2006 10:12:06 GMT
BP, whenever you post these things, you need to show the two original photos, and then the fade or combo, that way people can make a better opinion of it. Don't worry I will do. But those photos are still in this forum. See: 60if.proboards21.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=CelebRepl&thread=1098605945&page=3That about faux-George is taken from the White Album inner cover photos. Animation coming soon..... but, as Brugioni told, a 50% photos overaly is the result you need. So "God" Eric was Faux-George. Now my thought is: were the "new" Beatles BETTER than the "older" ONES?  |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Feb 15, 2006 19:48:20 GMT
No one has noticed that Eric "slowly" took the George's typical look.... Just few retouch on nose and chin... et voilà.... |
|
ilras
Contributor
Posts: 62
|
Post by ilras on Feb 15, 2006 21:24:43 GMT
My question is: now that the real (I presume that it was him) George died, what will the fake one do?
|
|
|
|
Post by beatled on Feb 16, 2006 1:20:16 GMT
Great song, (Ding Dong Ding Dong) which I will share, but I always felt if it had any meaning, it was for the other replacement... |
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Feb 16, 2006 7:41:31 GMT
are there live bootlegs of harrison in the 70s post-bangladesh? could musicians listen to such tapes and determine if they think it might be real-clapton playing?
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Feb 19, 2006 6:14:48 GMT
Great song, (Ding Dong Ding Dong) which I will share, but I always felt if it had any meaning, it was for the other replacement... Thanks, Jojo. It's nice pop. I remembered it from way back, oddly enough..... You are probably right on it. |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Feb 19, 2006 18:22:36 GMT
After the departure of Paul The Beatles needed a new genius among them. Eric Clapton was the best choice |
|
|
|
Post by byrdsmaniac on Feb 20, 2006 20:39:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Jun 20, 2006 18:55:18 GMT
|
|
moped
Contributor
Posts: 115 
|
Post by moped on Jun 30, 2006 16:56:28 GMT
Eric Clapton, THE TRUE one. Wait, are you saying White Album George is a double? I dunno... |
|
moped
Contributor
Posts: 115
|
Post by moped on Jun 30, 2006 16:58:56 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Oct 7, 2006 8:02:22 GMT
|
|
sweetlorettamartin
Contributor
You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.
Posts: 70
|
Post by sweetlorettamartin on Oct 11, 2006 3:23:17 GMT
Interesting observation! It did seem really out there at first for me, but looking at the situation and the difference in the real Eric Clapton and the man who we call "Feric"...what did they do with the real Eric? Make him a George replacement.
Makes sense in that at the time of "White Album" and While My Guitar Gently Weeps has Eric's true guitar genius at work. Something that the subsequent recordings since that era of Feric's pale in comparison. Would explain why the guitar work in the Beatles' later recordings were far superior than in the Beatles' early years. Not that George wasn't good, but he had a country, or rockabilly flair to his guitar work. Whereas the 1967-1970 the guitar seemed more bluesy.
Think about that body of work and not just facial comparisons.
It all is part of the whole picture....
It would make perfect sense, as with Fingo, as to why later interviews with the imposters seemed so strange to me as compared to the pre 66 interviews as well as how they presented themselves in body language, between themselves as well as with others. There is a distinct difference and one cannot just say it was the drug use that changed them. Keith Richards is the classic example of extreme drug abuse and you can tell it's the same man.
|
|
|
|
Post by jucom on Oct 23, 2006 7:56:43 GMT
Who is the man to the right (for us) to Ginger Baker? Looks like Brian Epstein! |
|
|
|
Post by JamesPaul & Brian on Oct 23, 2006 20:24:05 GMT
Who is the man to the right (for us) to Ginger Baker? Looks like Brian Epstein! Looks like Brian Epstein, but is really Don Knotts!  |
|
|
|
Post by jucom on Oct 24, 2006 5:22:53 GMT
I wonder what Don Knotts was doing with the Cream on that photo...
But it's really him, I see it, though he incredibly resembles Brian
|
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Oct 26, 2006 20:35:23 GMT
I wonder what Don Knotts was doing with the Cream on that photo... But it's really him, I see it, though he incredibly resembles Brian What amazes me is that even if the forehead and temple are a evident make-up (see the boundary) "they" left Don's left (on our right) eyebrow scar untouched.... "Just follow the path that has been prepared for you and you will find the source of truth." |
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Oct 30, 2006 21:47:15 GMT
It really seems that Don after being Faux Brian was "rebuilt" to make him different from who he performed. But on his last days they left him with his "basic" look that was still so much "Frian" |
|
|
|
Post by Rojopa on Nov 1, 2006 1:57:28 GMT
 Sun King you are nuts! This forum has taken a turn towards idiocy!
|
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Nov 1, 2006 3:58:45 GMT
Sun King you are nuts! This forum has taken a turn towards idiocy! If "idiocy" means pointing out the obvious truth to ourselves and other people who have overlooked it, I think we're on the right track here. Your outburst did nothing to make the rest of us smarter or more informed, if that's what you wanted to accomplish...which is what exactly? |
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Nov 1, 2006 22:42:32 GMT
Sun King you are nuts! This forum has taken a turn towards idiocy! Dear Rojopa .... it is just what I've seen and found ... "It's All Too Much" George Harrison told about all this matter... They are my words too.... |
|
|
|
Post by Rojopa on Nov 2, 2006 0:20:04 GMT
It has gotten to the point now that this forum is getting away from it's roots: the death/replacement of Paul. For the past few months now or longer, with the exception of a few PID posts, the posts have been about this one or that one having been replaced and the writer of the post(s) never back it up with facts but only their conjectures. If this forum has changed to include anyone famous who supposedly has been replaced, then please change the title. This forum has gone off on another path and it's credibility is at stake.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Nov 2, 2006 0:42:10 GMT
.. the posts have been about this one or that one having been replaced and the writer of the post(s) never back it up with facts but only their conjectures. Conjectures? Tell me ... where? |
|
Sun King you are nuts! This forum has taken a turn towards idiocy!