|
|
Post by katiemae on Nov 28, 2010 23:47:49 GMT
The one thing no one has mentioned about the Paul/Neil comparisons that I've read here, is that the eye color is blue-grey on the man "Neil" and I believe that JPM had hazel eyes (just like mine) which are green and brown. It's very difficult to get hazel eyes to photograph in any other color but either greenish brown, or brown. What say you all?? Have you ever known about scleral lenses? www.vampfangs.com/Contact-Lenses-s/6.htmwww.unrealfx.nl/vifit.htmlThere you can read:"the final scleral lenses test fitted into the actors eyes" wow! gosh! never knew such a thing was possible to look that real. Thanks! |
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Nov 28, 2010 23:49:43 GMT
Toward the End of the Film Magical Mystery Tour the Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band performs (by soundtrack) their 1967 song "Death Cab for Cutie". Part of the Lyrics are "slip sliding down Highway 31" as Cutie and the driver go to their death. If you believe as I do that the Magical Mystery Tour which was filmed over two weeks from September 11, 1967 to September 25, 1967 is a symbolic explanation of events of how Faul took over the role of Paul with the acceptance of the other Three Beatles then "slip sliding down Highway 31" would suggest that the Highway Paul had a fatal crash on was wet from rain. The only Highway 31 that I have found in England, and indeed Britain is A-31 that goes around 100 miles from Guildford to Bere Regis where it merges into A-35 in Dorset. Something that would be a piece of evidence in determining were Paul's was body was found by the "Authorities" would be to find out if it was raining or not on Saturday September 10, and Sunday September 11, 1966. Even a London Newspaper Weather Summary for Mid, and Western- South England that covers those areas would do the trick. I tried the Library, and the internet without luck. If someone with access to a London or English Newspaper Archive that goes back that far could research a Newspaper Weather Summery for the area A-31 goes through on those two Days it would tell us a lot. Agreed |
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Nov 28, 2010 23:50:43 GMT
|
|
Lic.Teish
Contributor
There's nothing you can't see that isn't shown
Posts: 161
|
Post by Lic.Teish on Dec 3, 2010 4:29:23 GMT
its prooved by craneometrics-
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jan 1, 2011 20:09:36 GMT
Down at the bottom there, that last screen capture, THAT is Paul, really Paul. Yes, Doc. Those are the very last images of Paul McCartney. They worth a gallery.  Paul McCartneyThese are genuine and I wish here were more from the period. But at least some of these authentic JPM film images have remained in circulation. Thanks for posting. |
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Jan 7, 2011 23:34:45 GMT
Yes, Doc. Those are the very last images of Paul McCartney. They worth a gallery. Paul McCartney These are genuine and I wish here were more from the period. But at least some of these authentic JPM film images have remained in circulation. Thanks for posting.  |
|
|
|
Post by romanruins on Feb 12, 2011 9:00:41 GMT
Hello, Its a fact that there are a lot of picture tree's at this site of Faul's, who where established Big Time Musicians. (Some of the pictures are not as well documented of the circumstances, or time period the picture was taken as could be.) Something to think about is the short video at YouTube "Paul is Dead! The Rotten Apple 38." for the Search box. Or www.youtube.com/watch?v=t816msm5nBcBill/Long term Faul is talking about setting up Wings and says "He didn't know how to set-up a band . . ." That indicates someone who is not a career Musician with experience in the Big Leagues to me. Someone like Tara Brown. Cheers, Ruins |
|
|
|
Post by mistermustard on Apr 18, 2011 20:25:44 GMT
Perhaps it is true...the Beatles were Paul's first band. Since he and John started writing songs as teenagers and then just continued on into the Beatles, there's not a large leap to think a statement like " didn't know how to set-up a band..." is factual. Compare it to a middle-aged divorcee that starts to date again and says they forgot how to date. People do have the license to be rhetorical or use a hyperbole every now and again. We all say stuff that is emotional or nonsensically periodically because we are human (excepting them pesky reptiles, right).
|
|
|
|
Post by romanruins on Apr 24, 2011 3:59:57 GMT
Mistermustard,
Faul does say in the Video, "The Beatles were already a sat/set-up affair".
John Lennon met Paul McCartney at the Quarrymen's 2nd performance, and Paul joined the Band at that time. Thats the "Quarrymen".
"The Beatles" started at the beginning of 1960.
Thats not Paul in the LandRover. He knew the camera was on, and He had full editing control afterward.
Cheers,
Ruins
|
|
|
|
Post by beatlesfan on Dec 26, 2011 0:31:50 GMT
HI there, can anyone shed the light ? I have some contradicting infos regarding Paul's dead how did he die ? if he was murdered in France by who and why ? digilander.libero.it/p_truth/why the whole sergeant Pep mentioned about the car accident with Rita etc? where and when he died ? is it 9 Nov or sometimes in late sep ? and where he died ? is it B Campbell , B Shepard or Phil Ackrill ? also whoever replaced him must be very good musician if not it is not credible the last and not the least, the mystery of Jane Asher, she had to deal with an other guy even being bribed to silence, I would have accepted the money and run away the next day,why should I continue my relationship with someone else ? thank you |
|
beacon
Contributor
http://beaconfilms2011.blogspot.com/
Posts: 79
|
Post by beacon on Jan 6, 2012 11:25:53 GMT
Hi Beatlesfan,
I will do my best to shed some light as I see it. I cannot promise that my version of events is accurate, it is merely my interpretation, however, the purpose of these forums is to discuss our research and through this, hopefully, we will one day discover the truth.
Personally, I don’t believe Paul died in France or anywhere else for that matter. 60if is a very imaginative document, but it lacks any substance. What we are seeing is the beginning of Pauls reinvention of himself and his utilisation of alter egos to allow him to not be the Beatle Paul. The real mystery is that from 1966 the Beatles, and Paul and John in particular, started acting and thinking differently. There are, without doubt, a whole plethora of clues and riddles on the cover of Sgt Pepper and in the lyrics of the songs.
The Sgt Pepper cover is a treasure map of clues to be solved and it tells a tale of death, enlightenment and resurrection.
You are correct when you talk about the large number of references to a car crash on the album. The references are to the death of a socialite, Tara Browne, the wealthy Guinness heir who blew his mind out in a car when he didn’t notice that the lights had changed. I believe McCartney was present at the scene. The pair of them had been tripping on LSD that night when Tara drove off to check on the progress of the artists, Binder, Edwards and Vaughan who were painting a psychedelic mural at Tara’s shop at the time.
Tara’s death had a devastating effect on McCartney who held himself responsible. He began to question his fame and the meaning of it.
The funeral scene depicted on the front cover of Sgt Pepper is a dual reference. It is an acknowledgement of his friend Tara’s death and it is a symbolic reference to the death of the old, cuddly, mop-top Beatles.
I don’t believe the mirror image on the drum is meant to be a date. It may be a coincidence and meaningless or it could be a reference to something else, possibly a biblical reference to Revelations. Revelation 1:19 reads; ‘Write the things which thou hast seen, and the things which are, and the things which shall be hereafter’. If you reverse the numbers it becomes Revelation 9:11 and reads; ‘And they had a king over them, [which is] the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue [is] Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath [his] name Apollyon’. This is a reference to the sun god Apollo – someone who dies and is reborn.
However, it is the characters depicted on the cover who hold the real clues to cracking the code. The Beatles were working with, and under the influence of, art gallery owner Robert Fraser for the Sgt Pepper cover and Paul had recently started to fund the Indica bookshop and art gallery for Barry Miles, John Dunbar and Peter Asher, Jane’s brother. These were influential and powerful connections and they introduced Paul and John to new people, ideas and philosophies which would shape and change their religious beliefs.
The inclusion of Aleister Crowley on the cover is a massive clue. One of Crowley’s disciples was the film maker Kenneth Anger, who, not incidentally, was a friend of Robert Fraser and who would arrange film showings at Fraser’s flat in the presence of both the Beatles and the Stones. Both bands would subsequently become hugely interested in the occult and the teachings of Crowley.
Crowley is one of eleven freemasons depicted on the cover and, indeed, one of three 33° master masons. Incidentally, if you put a compass over the album cover then the other two 33° master masons, Karl Marx and H G Wells are placed at exactly 33°. Furthermore, in 1988, the Beatles released the Past Masters LP, an album containing exactly 33 tracks.
For me, this is suggestive of the fact that the Beatles had been initiated with some sort of secret knowledge or had joined a secret masonic type organisation, possibly Crowley’s OTO. There are numerous other clues based around the characters depicted, particularly Diana Dors and Shirley Temple that I believe are relevant and are featured in my Youtube films.
In terms of the replacement Paul, or Faul as he is known, he simply wouldn’t be needed if no death took place. I am not saying that the Beatles did not use doubles at certain times, they may well have done. Indeed, there is a load of photographic ‘evidence’ to suggest this may have happened. However, the proposed replacements, Phil Ackrill, Viv Stanshall etc don’t amount to anything. These are weak and unviable proposals. William Campbell is just a made up name, supposedly the winner of a Paul look-a-like competition.
That said the Billy Shepherd character is interesting. A guy called Billy Shepherd did produce the Bee Gees and as they were managed by Robert Stigwood, who worked closely with Epstein at this time, would, possibly, have been known to the Beatles. Shepherd had also worked at Abbey Road previously and so would have also been known to George Martin. Therefore, it is possible that he was brought in to do some writing or arranging but why he wouldn’t have been credited is a matter for speculation. Someone called Billy Shepherd did also write articles for the Beatles monthly magazine and produced a Beatles book.
In January 1967, the Beatles monthly magazine included an article entitled ‘False Rumour’ which spoke of an alleged car crash involving McCartney’s mini-cooper. For me, this did not take place, however, it is indicative of yet another Beatles car crash reference – one of many. This alleged incident is reported to have taken place on 7th January 1967, 45 years ago tomorrow, and this was the same day that Lennon wrote ‘A Day In The Life’, his song about Tara Browne’s car crash.
Your point about Faul needing to be a great musician is the clincher for me. Not only would the replacement need to be a fantastic musician but an amazing song writer too. So, what are the chances that as well as being a perfect look-a-like the replacement could play bass, guitar and drums, sound like the original and be a song writing genius? Not likely.
With regard to Jane Asher. If he didn’t die then there is no problem. They just fell out of love as McCartney changed as he became more famous and started mixing in different circles. Also, he was far from faithful to her. On the other hand, if I am wrong and he did die and was replaced, then she did have a vested interest in keeping quiet as her brother Peter was heavily involved with Indica, which was financed by McCartney, and he later went on to work for Apple.
I wish PID and 60if were true, it would be the greatest story ever. Sadly, I don’t think they are. Something was happening though and this is the on-going mystery that needs answering and researching.
I hope I have dealt with all your queries and it would be great to hear your opinion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 7, 2012 11:21:26 GMT
I've also seen that "false rumour" written as the truth, but with McCartney not present.
January 7, 1967: Paul McCartney's car crashes en route from London to Sussex, driven by one Mohammed Hadjij, a Moroccan student who'd been invited to Paul's home in London for a party (Hadjij was assistant to gallery owner and socialite Robert Fraser). McCartney, however, is in Mick Jagger's Mini Cooper, which Hadjij is following in Paul's own Mini; the convoy is leaving Paul's house to travel to Keith Richards' Sussex home in order to continue the party. Paul's Mini crashes when another car drives over a hanging seatbelt, causing Hadjij to crash into a pole. He survives with only minor injuries, but since Paul's car is custom-made and well-known to Londoners, bystanders at the scene assume it's Paul that's been hurt. Partiers around town begin to circulate (and elaborate on) McCartney's "crash," going to far as to speculate that he has died and been replaced with a double.
|
|
beacon
Contributor
http://beaconfilms2011.blogspot.com/
Posts: 79
|
Post by beacon on Jan 7, 2012 13:12:12 GMT
Yes, that is the story that was published in the Beatles Monthly Magazine. It is obviously untrue, yet it was published in an official Beatle mag. I cover this subject in my film Is Paul Dead Beacon6 youtu.be/9qw21EhA6NoConsider the facts. The story claims that McCartney’s Black mini copper was involved in a crash on the M1. McCartney’s mini cooper was green. Proof of this can be seen in your own excellent set of 1967 photos. McCartney did not have a black mini cooper! The full story claims that a party consisting of McCartney, Mick Jagger, Keith Richards, Brian Jones, Robert Fraser and Christopher Gibbs head off to Richard’s Redlands home in Jagger’s mini cooper. This leaves Mohammed Chtaibi to follow behind in McCartney’s car. Look again at your photos of the mini cooper, there is no way six, fully grown men, could fit in. The accident happens, supposedly, on the M1 motorway. This is a stretch of road that heads north out of London. Richard’s Redlands home is in Sussex on the south coast. They are going the wrong way! I have read that they intended to swing past Jagger’s Hertfordshire home first. To the best of my knowledge Jagger lived in central London and did not own a home in Hertfordshire. The full story also claims that Chtaibi struggled to keep up with the other mini cooper. This is despite the fact that Jagger’s cooper is weighed down by six adults! Next, a stray seatbelt hanging from the car Chtaibi is driving causes the car to crash into a lamppost. I suggest looking at the photos of Marc Bolans mini after it hits a tree and kills him. That his wife survives is a miracle, and he was not travelling down a high speed motorway at the time of his crash. If Chtaibi did crash he would have died. Yet just a month later he is at Redlands just before the infamous bust. He looks surprisingly healthy. This whole story is blatant disinformation. Consider the date, 7 January 1967. Not a month since the death of McCartney and Brian Jones great friend Tara Browne. He, of course, did die in a car crash. It is also the same date that Lennon writes ‘A Day In The Life’ for the Sgt Pepper LP, a song about that very event. By this stage Robert Fraser and McCartney would have been heavily involved in the planning of the Sgt Pepper sleeve and its coded messages and funeral for a friend scene. This whole story would be extremely crass were it not designed with a higher purpose in mind. It is the first example of a car crash story which is a theme they return to with regularity after this point. I believe they engineered the whole PID story as a hoax, and though the complete picture may not have been envisaged at this stage, it is the first planted seed of the whole mystery. The full story can be read here www.gadflyonline.com/archive/mayjune00/archive-mccartney.html |
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Jan 8, 2012 10:31:37 GMT
 This is the reality. All the rest is just chatting. |
|
Lic.Teish
Contributor
There's nothing you can't see that isn't shown
Posts: 161
|
Post by Lic.Teish on Apr 7, 2012 8:59:02 GMT
IMAO (Tavistock Inducted 4 lads 2B replaced) Attachments:
|
|
sweetlorettamartin
Contributor
You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.
Posts: 70
|
Post by sweetlorettamartin on Jun 4, 2012 3:23:53 GMT
Well, they were put together for their "plan"....so why would it be a stretch to replace them as the program proceeded.
|
|
|
|
Post by ladymoonlight on Jul 24, 2013 15:15:14 GMT
Coming down the aircraft steps, the other three were wearing dark glasses (all same round shape), Faul at front oddly wearing a wig as it stands up to high on the crown and is darker than Paul's hair (it's there in your face and no one notices). That was decided for fake Paul to go out first. They couldn't say, "One of us is ill, so we can't appear", they would merely enlist one of the doubles/stand ins. They tried to replace Ringo in 1964 with someone who did not look like him; it didn't work. The clip in the Land Rover; saying, "it was a set up band"; you could read that more than one way. Forget Viv Stanshall/Neil Aspinall/Tara Browne: these are all red herrings.
|
|
