|
Post by Gene Genie on Nov 11, 2008 22:31:04 GMT
Yeah I know it's been mentioned before but I've been puzzling over this photo??... Years and years of plastic surgery down the toilet when you forget to put your contacts in!
|
|
|
Post by Gene Genie on Nov 13, 2008 20:19:49 GMT
So what colour were Paul's eyes? I've read Hazel but then you shouldn't believe all you read. Personally I'm convinced Brown...
|
|
|
Post by Gene Genie on Nov 14, 2008 21:01:12 GMT
The reason I'm asking is if as in the photo below(!) Paul has brown eyes and Linda had blue eyes then his children will have the brown gene as the dominant and therefore all have brown eyes. Of course Paul could be carrying the blue gene as a recessive in which case there would be a one in four chance of having a child with blue eyes. Two out of three aint bad! Mary's eyes are a kind of hazel (damn... There's that hazel thing again!) Heather Mills has green eyes. so I've lost even myself on this one!
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Nov 21, 2008 20:40:57 GMT
Yeah I know it's been mentioned before but I've been puzzling over this photo??... Years and years of plastic surgery down the toilet when you forget to put your contacts in! Help! When Paul found himself in time of troubles Mother Mary came to him ... with Wings
|
|
|
Post by Michelle, ma belle on Dec 2, 2008 7:15:47 GMT
Genie, Who's the little girl with blue eyes after Mary, Stella and James?
|
|
|
Post by khamira on Dec 2, 2008 20:14:44 GMT
It's little Beatrice...
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Dec 15, 2008 14:59:30 GMT
Yeah I know it's been mentioned before but I've been puzzling over this photo??... Years and years of plastic surgery down the toilet when you forget to put your contacts in! Help! When Paul found himself in time of troubles Mother Mary came to him ... with Wings I'm gonna put this as politely as I can: No one is buying the "old lady" angle anymore. It's only making you look bad. Stop. That is all.
|
|
|
Post by Michelle, ma belle on Dec 16, 2008 2:48:16 GMT
Sun KIng, James Paul was performing in 1975. www.youtube.com/watch?v=xuv0kiuDJM8Your theory does not hold the water. This story is very prosaic: for his own reasons Paul hired his body double and impostor William to play 'Paul McCartney'. No frail old ladies would be up for the rigors of job. Would never be discovered if it wasn't for INTERNET.
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Dec 17, 2008 0:10:43 GMT
Help! When Paul found himself in time of troubles Mother Mary came to him ... with Wings I'm gonna put this as politely as I can: No one is buying the "old lady" angle anymore. It's only making you look bad. Stop. That is all. Once the "Old Lady" was younger ... Time passes quickly ...
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Dec 17, 2008 22:37:01 GMT
And again I plead, drop the charade. It's become obvious to me as I've looked over your history of posts that either you've become so paranoid that any and every possibility is becoming unquestioned fact, or else you're just trying to see how gullible people are. Well, if it's the latter, we're not that gullible, and if it's the former, you do need help. Either way, the best way to resolve this situation is to stop, for the love of all that's holy.
|
|
|
Post by romanruins on Dec 18, 2008 6:05:12 GMT
Speak for yourself Peoples Committee! Especially when giving pissy psychogical profiles, and diagnosis of people you have exchanges with on the internet when some of their posts displease you, my Commissar. If you are coming with a higher more disciplined, healthier intellect than others here show us. Go ahead , and disprove Alice/Mary is Faul by application of Correct Scientific Method! Why don't you refute the thread here; the Twin Freaks thread page 11 posts 265 thru 267 where the "emboss" photo is; and "Mary" with the two boys at the Hi Res Comparison thread Sun King has submitted at this site. Sun King and others have submitted evidence on this subject, refute it if your unhappy. Wither you do or not ALLOW us to consider the proposals offered. Have you ever seen a picture of Mother Mary McCartney until you looked at it in the Hi Res Comparison thread.
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Dec 27, 2008 23:04:18 GMT
Speak for myself? This is straining the bounds of common sense as it is! You can't tell me you buy this! This has gone on for far too long, and someone needs to say something about this! Before, I could buy it...there's reasonable evidence to suggest that Paul McCartney was replaced, whether dead or alive. But now it's become all of this!
When does it stop? Where do we draw the line? Look at how many people have allegedly been replaced now! It's like half the world has been replaced! Somewhere along the way one has to realize that not all of this could have happened as Sun King says it did! Every time I turn around, something else is discovered, someone's saying that someone else was replaced, and before there's even enough evidence that it's not someone's sick joke, it's snapped up into this theory.
I can buy that Paul McCartney was replaced. But where do we stop and say, "This is what we've proven, let's do something about it"? I'm beginning to fear that we've been speculating so long that our case is falling apart! Now we look even more like fools to the rest of the world than we initially appeared. I'm tired of this. Either we consolidate our interests to what can be proved, or I see no further choice than to leave, and if the moderators will allow me, I'd prefer to do it myself instead of being unceremoniously dumped like yesterday's proverbial garbage.
|
|
|
Post by Michelle, ma belle on Dec 28, 2008 8:28:36 GMT
Peoplescommittee: This board has great entertainment value. Enjoy it! SunKing could be Yoko Ono for all we know. She'll be delighted if you quit.
|
|