Post by mistermustard on Apr 18, 2011 21:35:36 GMT
Okay, here's a thought/question/topic to be dissected.
If Strawberry Fields Forever b/w Penny Lane had hit the top of the charts, it would have been the group's 13th straight number one hit. So what I am wondering is if there is a connection to the Illuminati/shadowy, evil orginization, why wouldn't that group allow/force the song to be number one? Wouldn't this have been a great (on their part) move to allow the first (mostly) acknowledged post-Paul single to hit this occult number?
Basically, why not 13 straight number ones?
There is the argument that each side of the single was counted as the "A" side and split the count allowing Englebert Humperdink to claim the number one spot on the charts. If the record companies were/are Illuminati controlled they could have changed the tallying methodology. Or did they want to avoid that kind of attention while in the middle of easing in Faul?
Questions, thoughts, comments?
If Strawberry Fields Forever b/w Penny Lane had hit the top of the charts, it would have been the group's 13th straight number one hit. So what I am wondering is if there is a connection to the Illuminati/shadowy, evil orginization, why wouldn't that group allow/force the song to be number one? Wouldn't this have been a great (on their part) move to allow the first (mostly) acknowledged post-Paul single to hit this occult number?
Basically, why not 13 straight number ones?
There is the argument that each side of the single was counted as the "A" side and split the count allowing Englebert Humperdink to claim the number one spot on the charts. If the record companies were/are Illuminati controlled they could have changed the tallying methodology. Or did they want to avoid that kind of attention while in the middle of easing in Faul?
Questions, thoughts, comments?