|
Post by Uberkinder on Aug 11, 2003 11:52:32 GMT
Which one's are you referring to? I only have that one shot of them standing in a row that I found on a site while scouring around for photos. Unfortunately I can't remember where. That's the original size I found it in, so the eye color is impossible to tell. Faul's green eyes in MMT make this moot, though. Look at the bright green VHS version eyes here: www.anycities.com/user/uberkinder/fc52.htmlAnd then look at the dvd version; suddenly they're dark hazel! No digital tampering going on there! I'm interested to hear what the skeptics have to say about this: www.anycities.com/user/uberkinder/fooldvd.html
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 11, 2003 12:58:02 GMT
My mistake - wow. The album designers must have tampered with faul's eyes on the pepper shoot. It's very weird to think that all these people doing the album covers and the photo shoots were involved in the coverup. Presumably they were sworn to secrecy? Hey Jae, "Pepper" IS Faul! (before plastic surgery!) Please take a look at: 60if.proboards21.com/index.cgi?board=faul&action=display&thread=1059590338
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Aug 11, 2003 13:45:47 GMT
The people actually shooting the phots didn't have to know aything was going on. Just whoever was manipulating the images for EMI - who presumably was an intelligence agent long since sworn to secrecy and apprised of hte penalty for going off the reservation.
|
|
|
Post by Uberkinder on Aug 13, 2003 4:56:24 GMT
Actually, Faul was supposedly the one who directed MMT and it's photoshoots, which is probably why it was such a terrible movie. I love it because the Beatles were in it, but come on, the overall concept was awful.
|
|