Creating doubles

[Mollymalone]

www.rense.com/general46/doub.htm

Buhmann says he found the doubles by looking for pairs of pictures in which Saddam's pose was essentially the same. Using a computer graphic program, the scientist marked each picture to highlight such features as the length and width of the head, the size of the eyelids and nostrils, and the forms of the ears and chin. By then overlaying the two pictures, he was able to calculate how closely the features matched, indicating whether the person in the pictures was the same man or not.

The forensic expert confirms that extensive cosmetic surgery has been performed to create the doubles, but that there are limits to what surgery can do:

"You can do a lot with cosmetic surgery. You can change the external form of the ear, for example, or of the earlobes -- that is possible. You can also alter the prominent features either to make them more prominent or to remove them."

He continues: "But what you cannot change is the length and width of the complete head, and that is where one detects the doubles."

[Fwings]

Well, I hope that shows some people that Sun King's method of comparing photographs is legitimate.

[Piggies]

QUOTE:
>>> "Using a computer graphic program, the scientist marked each picture "

The key is that it says scientist (someone trained to do this type of work)

Notice how it doesn't say "Some guy with Photoshop"

[Piggies]

Chris said:

:oPiggies - SunKing is a trained professional. I'm sure that he will speak up for himself when he reads what you wrote. He's not just SOME GUY with photoshop...
SHEESH !!!!

Chris

I look forward to his reply.

I didn't know he was trained in forensics.

Thanks.

[TheWatusi]

I didn't know he was trained in forensics.

i do hope he does respond to this, youll be surprised with the results, id suppose.

coincidentally enough to the saddam thing, i remember when i first got turned on to 60IF and first started talking to SunKing, saddams doubles and how they were distinguished as doubles was the main point i made to him.

[SunKing]

Piggies said:

QUOTE:
>>> "Using a computer graphic program, the scientist marked each picture "

The key is that it says scientist (someone trained to do this type of work)

Notice how it doesn't say "Some guy with Photoshop"

Ask Paul Bearer who really I am.
Please see the FAQ at:
60if.proboards21.com/index.cgi?board=document&action=display&thread=1060491028&start=0
before posting anything.

It's not me telling that but those of FaceIT:

www.identix.com/products/pro_security_bnp_argus.html

Chris: Thank You!
Friends: how come after all that time you are not able to reply by yourself those kind of answers yet?
There is still the FAQ.
It's self explanatory.

[Piggies]

xpt626 said:

you should read more before you pop off comments like that and show your ignorance.

*sigh* another day, another troll

I've got your ignorance right here. ;D

[TotalInformation]

Yes . . . if you still think those two photos line up, you are indeed again displaying your ignorance. Your blindness. Your incompetence. The extent of your brainwashing. All of the above.

[Curious]

That is one of the worst crossfades I've ever seen.

Shooting yourself in the foot, Piggies.

[TheWatusi]

ha, piggies that animation doesnt really help your case ;D

[Piggies]

Well yes, actually, they look like they line up pretty well to me.

TotalInfo, as usual, makes his point in a most inappropriate way, but if anyone else would care to explain why I am so far off here, I would appreciate it.

As an aside. I have been branded as a troll here on several occasions because I have posted some things here the seem to go against the 60IF theory. The truth is, I became intrigued by this site, and it's ideas, and spent a lot of time recently looking for things that would both confirm and go against the theory presented here. Each person must, of course, decide for him/herself.

So I post a picture of the man you call Faul with Ringo and George not long before Georges death. It appears to me that "Faul" does not tower over George in any way, and I am called a troll.

I am searching for the truth, and have found "my truth" *(what I believe to be true)* . I have tried to the best of my ability to have an open mind, and in the end I remain unconvinced.

But:

I have learned a lot here in the last couple of weeks about one of my favorite group, and for that I am thankful.

You may be surprised to know that I am a professional musician (guitar/vocals) whose band plays a lot of Beatles songs including:

Penny Lane
Got To Get You Into My Life
Can't Buy Me Love
A Hard Days Night
Something
Ticket To Ride
Lady Madonna
Oh Darling!
and a few more.

Thanks to all who have been kind here despite differing opinions. I hope for peace and a happy holiday season for you all.

[mike]

Well, Piggies. I, personally don't mind skeptics. Even though it's not our job to convince you, and the links SK put explain it all, I like a different point of view every now and then. But what bothers me are troll skeptics, the kind who flame everyone who disagrees w/them. The kind who make threads like 60if.proboards21.com/index.cgi?board=document&action=display&thread=1071893714 this