|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 20, 2004 17:55:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Apr 20, 2004 20:23:37 GMT
Thank you, Billy. I can see Bill's fee have a higher arch; his toes are sort of curled under (bet he has corns!); Bill's great toe is larger than normal; his feet are longer and narrower than Paul's. Anyway, that's what I see. Paul's feet are shorter and wider; his arch is lower; his toes straighter; and his big toe is more slender. Again, thanks for the pictures, Billy!
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 21, 2004 12:40:01 GMT
Great observations Abbey. I just wanted to say that if anyone has photos of either Paul or Faul barefoot could you please add them to this thread? The more photos we have for comparison the more accurate our observations will be.
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Apr 21, 2004 14:14:48 GMT
Thanks, Billy. I noticed some further things, too. Paul's little toe is really short and Faul's isn't. Also Paul's second to last toe is a bit thicker (mine are the same way) Wonder if someone out there has some good close up shots of the feet. If you do, please post them.
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Apr 21, 2004 18:35:15 GMT
Thanks, Abbey. Please, anyone else who has photos of these men barefoot, please add them to this thread!
|
|