|
Post by BeatlePaul on Mar 15, 2005 17:20:29 GMT
My copy of the album (vynil) is Italian. What I noticed is the diffent way they wrote the lyrics. In "Reprise" you can read "Sergeant Pepper's Lonely...", in Sgt. you can read "Sgt. Pepper's Lonely ...". As if the band saying goodbye is "complete", the band introducing themselves is ... just an acronyms. Funny to read: 'Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band' Recording commenced in studio two at Abbey Road on February 1 1967'Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (Reprise)' Recording commenced in studio one at Abbey Road on April 1 1967Exactly two months later to record the same song. But I can read too: 'Strawberry Fields Forever' 'Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (Reprise)' Recording commenced in studio two at Abbey Road on November 24 1966About two months later the....
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Mar 16, 2005 1:41:00 GMT
BeatlePaul i think Michelle66 is referring to where they write the lyrics, i've noticed it myself but never known quite what to make of it
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Mar 24, 2005 22:08:42 GMT
Yet another reprise, yes.. This is a new method of sound separation, 2 rear, 2 front, and a center, you have to download all five sound files and play them together. I don't have the setup for that, but I thought it would be interesting to see if that yelling is a little more clear in one of the channels. I'd say yes.. http://*banned link*/Shoebox/YAReprise.mp3 What is this method of separation called, and what do you use to do it? It sounds very interesting! (I became a member somewhat just to ask this )
|
|
|
Post by beatled on Mar 24, 2005 22:53:13 GMT
Jeez i hate to disapoint ya there, but I really don't know. I would assume it's called five channel separation or some such, and as for the equipment, I would assume a sound card that's capable of 5 separate channels, or one of those setups perhaps that you can get at Best Buy that does it.
I just found a few files like this, and thought it would be cool to isolate the voices, we have very specialized needs here, lol.
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Mar 24, 2005 23:40:35 GMT
I can't seem to find anything about it on the internet. You can't find anything interesting but obscure on the internet, exept this forum of course But wherever did you find those files?
|
|
|
Post by beatled on Mar 25, 2005 1:06:15 GMT
Found em on a usenet binaries group, alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.beatles. (where I get a vast majority of my audio, and alt.binaries.beatles for the video material)
Get yourself a good news client like newsleacher, and pay a somewhat high price for a news server like giganews, depending on your finances, but you have posts going back a month, quite nice!
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Apr 2, 2005 14:51:20 GMT
Steve's Beatles Page anomalies section reckons this, 1:15-1:17 After Paul's "Wooo", John says "Paul, hold my guitar for me". Heard using OOPS. Also Paul heard really going mad singing. On mono versions this is heard better, "We'll be back" or "We're the band, the greatest band of all time", and a faint "Sergeant Peppers BAND!", finishing on the final chord A likely story
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Apr 2, 2005 18:05:00 GMT
well, if you listen carefully, you can hear "yeah, sargent peppers BAND" finishing on the last chord. Its not by the shouting voice, its a normal talking voice, and its incredibly faint, but its there. The other stuff is just trying to avoid the truth...
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Apr 13, 2005 20:52:11 GMT
Well, I messed around with the YAReprise in Audacity (exelent freeware program, audacity.sourceforge.com), and came up with this: members.lycos.co.uk/noodlzforum/YARepriseslowslowslow.wav(don't click link, put it in address bar) And JoJo, do you perchance still have the whole vocal-shaker track? It would be facinating to hear, because I like the Beatles' 3 part harmonies
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Apr 13, 2005 21:49:49 GMT
Im interested to hear that file RRD but i cant download it by left or right clicking, i just get geocities page not found message.
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Apr 13, 2005 22:15:36 GMT
This is a new method of sound separation, 2 rear, 2 front, and a center
I think the only Beatles/BEATLES songs that have been released in five-channel are on the Yellow Submarine Songtrack... ?
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on Apr 14, 2005 15:00:38 GMT
Found a stereorized version of the Reprise with Paul shouting even more clearly tpiproductions.port5.com/PepperStereo.mp3Oh, and TotalInformation: Don't know how JoJo did it, but I do know that there are 24-Bit Stereo Remasters of all the old Beatles albums... PS: (for Sis Mary Abbey) It still sounds like "in a way" (not "anyway"), even more clearly when played in slow motion
|
|
|
Post by beatled on Apr 14, 2005 22:51:05 GMT
Interesting Total, I didn't know it's only supposed to be Yellow Sub with the 5 part separation. I didn't really grab much, and it's disappeared for now. (it will no doubt make the rounds again, I'll keep an eye out) Pardon my dumb question RRD, but what do you mean by the "vocal shaker track"?
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Apr 15, 2005 0:02:17 GMT
the track of Sgt Peppers ... Reprise with just the vocals and shaker which YAReprise is a clip of
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Apr 15, 2005 0:05:46 GMT
Although i believe theyre saying PID etc, it is absolutely impossible to say either way what theyre saying for certain.
EG. "Thank you ladies and gentlemaan!" at the end, sounds more like "thank you paul is gentleman" hence, IMO what they are saying is hard to interpret, ie. PID non believers will say, "oh he's just saying.... blah blah blah" whereas PID belivers will think its "Paul is dead, really really dead, paul is dead, paul is really dead, really dead ooo, thank you ladies and gentlemen."
Whearas i think there's more.
Sgt peppers lonely Sgt peppers lonely Sgt peppers lonely hearts (something i cant understand) "paul is dead" (something more) Club "really really dead" Band "paul is dead, paul is really dead, really dead ooo, thank you ladies and gentlemen." For the record i think "thank you ladies and gentlemen" is not what it sounds like.
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Apr 15, 2005 2:46:17 GMT
Maybe the Anthology DVDs were done in 5.1 and someone pulled the Reprise audio off of that? But would that even mean they remixed the song from source tapes?
Elsewise, I would think it's some kind of "outfake."
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on Apr 15, 2005 15:19:58 GMT
Plastic Paul: it doesn't sound anything like that... Even with the knowledge of a very little bit of english vocabulary, you can clearly hear that it's not that. (Even more clearly thanks to JoJo)
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Apr 16, 2005 0:26:01 GMT
Really? Please transcribe what you hear so i can see where im mis-hearing things.
Much appreciated thanks TPI.
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Apr 16, 2005 0:43:20 GMT
Rather than editing i feel i should write a separate post. Sorry TPI, i had read your version but skipped it when reading updated posts. OK, i understand where you're coming from, and hearing it again its all very contentious, what you say is possible but i just dont think it's "i know you're scared but he's" coz im certain theres a little bit more after that that is hidden by "club". But anyway i have now realised that every single word that is said has a number of possibilities of what is actually being said, which was always the plan im sure. To the mainstream he's saying something completely innocent but to PID'ers he's saying something that means something to do with the conspiracy, we agree on that whether or not we agree on what he's actually saying! Anyway, my apologies again TPI for rushing into an initial reply.
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on Apr 16, 2005 8:03:14 GMT
Hey, no problem dude. But I think that the "Really, really dead! How was that good for the band in a way?" couldn't be denied by the mainstream. It is said very clearly, and we have enough stuff to prove it. This is different that the "I Buried Paul" which ís "Cranberry Sauce" cause I have a nice version of the song (the version JoJo had, but in better quality) where you can really hear "Cranberry Sauce
I'll post that one later on
But having listened to the Pepper reprise, I hear this now:
"I don't want to scare everybody" "Really, really dead!" "How was that good for the band in a way?" "Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, uh"
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Apr 17, 2005 16:00:19 GMT
I see, as i've said before elsewhere, i have an early mono LP version of the album but no deck to play it on, theyre expensive things these days but ive heard that it should be clear exactly what he's saying on that, i live in hope, as soon i've heard it i'll update my stance. But i agree it can sound like he's saying that, its all about listening for it, once id read you say that i, could hear it, but is that being influenced to hear something?
|
|
|
Post by unrepentant on Apr 24, 2005 1:48:42 GMT
i have it burned onto my bedroom computer, and even with my malfunctioning computer speakers i can hear faul saying something........it's delivered in a forceful speaking voice, but barely audible in the background.
|
|
|
Post by TPIMaster on Jun 23, 2005 18:10:52 GMT
This is a new method of sound separation, 2 rear, 2 front, and a centerI think the only Beatles/BEATLES songs that have been released in five-channel are on the Yellow Submarine Songtrack... ? I can finally answer this question. You see, in Anthology, which was mixed in 5.1, at episode 6, after the A Day In The Life videoclip, there's the reprise. With the screaming in the background (stereo but with 5.1 splitting that doesn't do a lot.)
|
|
|
Post by ReallyReallyDead on Jun 24, 2005 3:25:20 GMT
here's what I definately hear HEARTS.... (dunno) CLUB.... (REALLY REALLY DEAD!!!) BAND!!! (Paul is dead yeah, for the band anyway (something like "ha hee" under the "wooo!") Thank you guals and gentleman, yeah!) whoever says this says "for the band anyway" because Paul is alive for the world, but dead for the band. Also, I'm not sure why it's "guals" but thats what I hear. And yes, thats where my name comes from
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jun 24, 2005 3:38:39 GMT
Sounds like ladies and gentlemen to me, buit i think the way its sung makes it more like "laids and gennelmaan"
|
|