|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jun 1, 2005 4:46:17 GMT
Paul McCartney and John Lennon:    From the Paris Concert December, 1965. Filmed 6 months after "Help!" opened. |
|
|
|
Post by TheAquaOne on Jun 3, 2005 1:45:27 GMT
Much different facial bone structure then the current Paul, not to mention size and the way he carries himself.
|
|
|
|
Post by beatled on Jun 3, 2005 2:31:30 GMT
Like through a gauze filter, of course that's because it made the rounds and all.. But..I think it clicked for me finally, what you see here Perplexed. Small, and the appearance of someone who looks really young for his age, more like someone still in his mid teens.
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Jun 3, 2005 4:30:27 GMT
Are you sure you maintained the proper aspect ratios in the trasnsfer? might the first be a bit too wide and the last a bit long?
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jun 3, 2005 6:02:45 GMT
Are you sure you maintained the proper aspect ratios in the trasnsfer? might the first be a bit too wide and the last a bit long? As a novice, I am not sure. Help me to know. I used Mac OSX "grab" feature and "grabbed" these directly from the download I had. I agree with you, the bottom shot seems a big like the head is not as wide, as broad in the cheekbones. But, the jaw is dropped very low, as he makes his usual "pom-pom-pom-pom" puffing mouth as he plays bass in rhythm. A little personality habit that William does likewise. The 3rd pic also looks too young, in a way, but later frames, as he comes more forward--show a little older appearence. I will grab and post some of those. There are lighting issues. Obviously, there has been deterioration in this olf film and loss of detail. Maybe there is a certain amount of data "drop-out" due to the media used. It helps to see it all. I have isolated certain pics, but there are others thruout that agree with these. |
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jun 3, 2005 8:51:29 GMT
Just as a side point, it's strange that when they were in Germany, Paul was never (officially anyway) questioned about his age, yet george was eventually pulled up on it and sent home, perhaps the story has been adapted from paul to george?
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Jun 3, 2005 10:03:58 GMT
Are you sure you maintained the proper aspect ratios in the trasnsfer? might the first be a bit too wide and the last a bit long? Yes it's good to see the whole frame.... But it already seems to be genuine.... The problem is that people are used to see the doctored pictures of Paul so when there is something genuine it looks strange... |
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jun 3, 2005 12:00:58 GMT
Exactly! that was what i was trying to say about the wax beatles on the cover of Sgt. Pepper in another thread  |
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Jun 3, 2005 18:40:19 GMT
well, i was looking primariily at the aspect ratios of the pictures, and the pics seem to correlate. I would think the frames should have about a 4:3 ratio. But if your pics are slightly cropped from a full frame that is 4:3, then.. never mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Jun 3, 2005 20:16:37 GMT
JPM was a year older than George, dude.
|
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Jun 3, 2005 20:46:05 GMT
I am aware of that, but it has been said recently that JPM looks "in his mid teens" even in his early to mid 20's so when he was only 17 or 18 he must have seemed very young, so if george was called up on age then, (as they would have been together), you would have thought that the authorities would have been very suspicious towards JPM as well!
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jun 3, 2005 23:42:55 GMT
well, i was looking primariily at the aspect ratios of the pictures, and the pics seem to correlate. I would think the frames should have about a 4:3 ratio. But if your pics are slightly cropped from a full frame that is 4:3, then.. never mind. YEs, I just cropped it; that's a portion of the frame. It looks identical, it's just chopped around the edges. I can go back and do the full frames. I will do full frames if I do any more. There are quite a few other spots equally of interest. |
|
