Paul vs. Faul - comparing foreheads

[BillyJones]

Paul:



Faul:



The resemblance is remarkable. The thing is, Paul's head & face shape are different than Faul's. It's something that wouldn't even be noticeable, if you weren't looking for it. I find this whole concept quite frightening.
If you look over the many photos of Faul & Linda that I posted yesterday, you can see that he has quite a large
forehead. Paul does not. Check this out, Paul from behind the scenes filming Help!!!:



If you compare this to the previous photo, you can see that Paul had a smaller forehead. Here's another photo of Faul where you can see his forehead:



Paul:




Paul has a smaller head & face than Faul, hence his shorter forehead. If anyone has photos of Paul where you can see his forehead, could you please post it to this thread? I've also noticed that Paul almost ALWAYS wore bangs prior to 1967. Not so afterwards.

Some of the many photos I have of Paul in bangs:

The flasher:



From Help!!!:














In this last set of photos, he doesn't look much taller than Ringo to me. Maybe he DID wear lifts in his shoes.
Look at his bone structure. What a SMALL man he was.

Now look at Faul:



Faul's ribs are showing & he's still a bigger guy than Paul was. Here's another photo:



Look at the size of that man's knees. Now look at Paul sitting in a bathing suit:



I really don't think that they look like the same man.

[trapacero]

They had a different way of staring too. Don´t know how people dismiss this evident proof. Ok maybe the staring does not qualify as "evident proof". But someone who continuisly stare at stares knows what i´m talking about.

[abbey]

You mean like Paul would actually look directly at a person whereas Bill looks elsewhere usually?

[abbey]

Bumpity bump !!!