|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 26, 2005 6:50:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Mar 27, 2005 21:05:08 GMT
NO offense meant, but-So, is that genuine, or some kind of a fautograph?
|
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Mar 27, 2005 21:21:00 GMT
They all do look a bit suspicious.
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 28, 2005 4:43:48 GMT
I interrogated the person offering it on eBay and s/he says it's from the 64 show in Philly...
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Mar 28, 2005 5:20:48 GMT
Good, Total. Sorry, to ask. Do you mean, you "queried" the person, or did you "interrogate" the person?
Not to sound flip or rude--your choice of word, though, is, it seems to me, heavy. I mean, think about police interrogation, the hose, he shackles, sleep deprivation, a single 250 watt lamp in your face, no water or food.....
when I think of Interrogation................
|
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Mar 28, 2005 5:22:48 GMT
Well, at first I typed "queried" here, but I bumped it up for dramatic effect. It took about 3 emails to pry a good answer from this person, and I had to school her(?) a bit..
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Mar 28, 2005 7:06:03 GMT
In which case, the Jeopardy judges happily award you the point for correct usage. What is "interrogation?"  ;D  Interrogate, and though shalt receive............ Some things ya jus gotta know............inquiring minds gotta know. Glad you pursued it........so, that lady was THERE. I am jealous. I wanted to see the Beatles at Atlanta-Fulton County Stadium in 1965. I begged my parents. I think I even pulled the crying routine. The answer once again was, "No." Maybe that's why I follow this so much now. I suffered from Early Childhood Beatle Deprivation, or ECBD. |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 28, 2005 14:26:37 GMT
The autographs look authentic. The only thing that looks a bit odd is that they're all so close together   |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Apr 10, 2005 0:51:01 GMT
And if anyone cares, you notice that Bill's signature of Paul is a bit different...for one the "cC" written together like an "E"....Bill's has a space between them, not James Paul.
|
|
|
|
Post by McGarrett-Five-0 on Apr 10, 2005 3:05:20 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Apr 11, 2005 3:19:03 GMT
Wouldn't it be lover-ly if we had an handwriting expert. It took Bill awhile to copy Paul's signature, not to mention, Bill is a rightie and Paul was a leftie. Now many have come to accept Bill's signature as Paul's.........it's a crying shame...... I would love to compare signatures on the original deed to Cavendish and Rembrandt. And after Jim died, Bill sold the house out from under his widow, Angela.....what a cold-hearted bastard. He sure didn't need the money! I might add, after Jim died and Bill, pretending to be Paul, didn't even have the decency to attend "his father's" funeral. Since Bill is afraid or something to reside at Cavendish.....could it be haunted ;D ;D ;D ;D? ?.....wonder if he put it on the market or is just hanging on to it? Maybe he is afraid of a signature comparison since more people are becoming aware of 60IF. When he stole Angela's home, there was no one doing any real inquiries. Anyone out there work in the Assessor's office or England's equivalent? |
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Apr 11, 2005 4:18:23 GMT
We don't need an expert to see they aren't the same signatures, but it would be interesting to see what one would have to say.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mollymalone on Apr 12, 2005 2:44:10 GMT
I'm not an expert but I have studied Graphology a little  This one looks dubious: You can see the marks where someone hesitated as if to make sure they got it right - they look like fullstops - on the P and a? And smaller ones on the l, m and t |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Apr 12, 2005 14:14:10 GMT
Good job! It does look like they stopped and started.....still "practicing". Paul didn't bring the "P" down like that......That is a Bill signature for sure!
|
|
;D 
-Paul autograph. 
- Paul autograph-1963