|
Post by Darkhorse on Nov 30, 2003 1:36:52 GMT
wow this new information is very interesting.. i know this may sound like a stupid question but where is this suppose to have taken place.. the reason i ask is that if it happened in england their is a problem with the story unless its just an error in the translation.. a taxi in britain is a black hackney cab. they only have one seat up front and up to 5 in the back. i know this because my father was a taxi driver for many years and my brother is one now.. the technology of the taxi's have changed over the years but the design has basically stayed the same.. so how did brian sit in the front? Isn't there a black car on the cover of Abbey Road, on the right? Look at 6th and 7th pictures: xoomer.virgilio.it/james_paul_mccartney/abbey_road.htmlMaybe this is another clue?
|
|
|
Post by TotalInformation on Nov 30, 2003 7:54:29 GMT
GonnaOpen - You lay out a pretty good scenario. I would caution however about thinking of this as a situation where MI5/MI6 are reacting to a problem (McCartney's death) created by *someone else* -- folks driving around with impunity in black vans almost invariably turn out to be intelligence operatives of the country they're driving around in.
|
|
|
Post by beldabeast on Nov 30, 2003 9:26:32 GMT
Seems to me it would be a simple matter to discover the location of the accident by tracing the route from the airport to their destination .
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Nov 30, 2003 12:20:51 GMT
It seems to me I was chosen as a "media" for this truth. Before I received from a journalist "60IF", then that last document. I' ve spent those last days to check if what told in that mail "fits" with the photo/video/lyrics messages left by The Beatles. Well, IT TOTALLY FITS. Now I think "60IF" was "a version to be published", (it doesn't state who was the guilty) a sort of smoothed interpretation of the reality. Like Mrs Mustard I FEEL this is what really happened. The "lost" detail is that the car started fired (or was set alight) then James Paul was helped by the girl to go out. Probably James Paul's legs was damaged by the fire. Probably that girl (the only witness) was shooted. Frian was already ready for good or evil porpouses. Remember "the power" Brian had. THE BEATLES received MBE for "economical" reasons. Pay attention to the parallelism with the Diana "car accident". Is that a "standard" procedure? THE BEATLES were going to "betray" the Crown. DIANA was going to "betray" the Crown too (having a baby from Dodi). Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds = Brian with the american contract inside the taxi taken off the muddy waters by an elicopter. That's the reason why "Yellow Submarine" was reprised too. Yes, now EVERYTHING FITS. For me: CASE CLOSED P.S. Please take a look at this cover. Do you notice something strange in its right side?
|
|
|
Post by yellowmatter on Nov 30, 2003 14:33:01 GMT
Is that the sillhouette of Paul on the right?
Looks like a part is missing from his face.
That what you were referring to SK?
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Nov 30, 2003 15:49:50 GMT
:oI see what you're talking about yellowmatter. Yuck !!!! S.K. I don't know. Maybe TOO pat an answer. I have my sources, as you know. Unfortunately, they're not willing to give up much... All I can do is wait, & hope that something more will come to light... Love to all... Chris
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Nov 30, 2003 16:19:36 GMT
This is a repost. The white volkswagon on the cover of Abbey Road seems to have gotten all of the attention, but if this latest story is true then the black car on the right has been confirmed by Spanky to be a black cab. The same kind that Brian, Paul and the girl took. xoomer.virgilio.it/james_paul_mccartney/abbey_road.html
|
|
|
Post by pennylane on Nov 30, 2003 16:58:01 GMT
if you look at picture three you will see a black taxi driving towards them. that is a taxi from the 70's but if you look at the taxi parked in picture 6 its a taxi from the 60's.. maybe a replica of the taxi paul and brian were in?...
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Nov 30, 2003 18:35:06 GMT
Is that the sillhouette of Paul on the right? Looks like a part is missing from his face. That what you were referring to SK? Yes. James Paul's bloody shape. There is NO other Beatle's shape.
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Nov 30, 2003 18:43:23 GMT
This is a repost. The white volkswagon on the cover of Abbey Road seems to have gotten all of the attention, but if this latest story is true then the black car on the right has been confirmed by Spanky to be a black cab. The same kind that Brian, Paul and the girl took. xoomer.virgilio.it/james_paul_mccartney/abbey_road.htmlDid someone aid James Paul before the arriving of the Intelligence and leave his Volkswagen there ?
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Nov 30, 2003 19:30:05 GMT
sorry, but........ in fact the original cover also had george in the back side. the sillhouettes are from "help" sessions. (at least the cover i have......) Yes I agree LJ, but notice Paul's sillouette is in red!
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Dec 1, 2003 4:02:40 GMT
BTW, I edited the original post of this thread to say: The rest (of the story) fits in perfectly with "60IF".instead of These facts fit in perfectly with "60IF".. Slight translation problem, sorry!
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Dec 3, 2003 3:56:20 GMT
Any problems replying to this thread have now been fixed.
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Dec 7, 2003 6:34:02 GMT
Umm...or...maybe now in fact. ;D ;D ;D
Sorry, a forum bug sometimes invisibly locks threads. It should be fixed now - I hope.
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Dec 10, 2003 4:58:46 GMT
Italian Journalist:
I realize there's a language barrier, but suspicion of what? Is he referring to the part where the other Beatles were told to act naturally and keep to their schedules? Or something more sinister....
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Dec 10, 2003 6:19:59 GMT
I think he meant to divert suspicion from the fact that they had signed with a new record label.
|
|
|
Post by bilthy on Dec 16, 2003 2:51:09 GMT
EMI unlimited supply?
Remember the supposed next big music phenomena, the sex pistols were originally signed to EMI. they realized the screwing they were getting from EMI and left signing with A&M. Soon enough their BASS PLAYER sid vicious and his girlfriend were dead, and the sex pistols finished.
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Dec 16, 2003 16:25:14 GMT
no, he killed his nancy, his girlfriend, again supposedly, and then went to jail for it, served some time, and partied after he got out to celebrate his getting out and od'd.
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Dec 17, 2003 4:31:39 GMT
dont worry about it, id be naive to expect people on a beatles-related forum to know the history of a punk band such as the sex pistols! ;D there were rumors about who it was, him, the infamous drug dealer, and the list continues. personally i believe that it was him, and the od wasnt staged or anything. its just the type of person he was. he admitted that he didnt remember the situation at all, that he woke up and she was dead, and he couldnt positively say one way or another.
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Dec 17, 2003 4:32:45 GMT
although, on a loosely related note, i reccomend the song "sid vicious was innocent" by the exploited ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Dec 29, 2003 5:38:00 GMT
TEXT Reading the above pages have answered many questions I had, including Paul's having a moped accident. I just want to cry to think anyone could possible have treated Paul's body so disrespectfully. Someday I truly hope the whole truth comes out in big, bold print! And then James Paul McCartney can finally rest in peace. Love to all and thank those who have worked ferretting out the truth.
|
|
|
Post by Fwings on Jan 2, 2004 8:58:09 GMT
1st, why did Paul wear a top wig I had no idea. I've never heard of that A wig to make his hair look fuller You know, I think that could be true, because one thing I've wondered about the corpse photo is why his hair looks so unusual. Was James Paul balding? It looks like there's a bare spot on the side.
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Jan 3, 2004 7:37:18 GMT
I've spent a lot of time going over the death photo of Paul, and I've decided it's no such thing. Who or whatever this is appears to be decapitated for starters. The eyes don't look right. They would have been much more sunken, closed or eaten by beasts. His right eyebrow is still arched which it shouldn't be if he's dead. The gouges around his mouth look like they were made by a precision machine--not the tearing of animals. In all, I'm convinced (to my great relief) that this is NOT a death photo of Paul.
I would appreciate the input of any photo experts.
|
|
|
Post by Fwings on Jan 3, 2004 7:54:42 GMT
I'm pretty sure that's really his corpse. It's a bit hard to stomache, true, but compare it with the picture in my avatar. The facial features and size of the head all match. The image on the 60IF main page is a bit blurry... I became sure when I examined it directly in the "Free as a Bird" video. For starters, the eyes do appear to be sunken in and slightly gnashed. Secondly, that's not his right eyebrow, but a strand of hair from his head. Third, he doesn't apper to be decapitated in the video. The image is hidden in the window of a police van when the camera pans by, and whoever snuck it in created a "wave" effect, bending the image around like a reflection (but one that's obviously not when compared with the other reflections seen in the vehicles). So this image is slightly distorted from the wave effect, giving it the odd appearance. In the video, it looks even more haunting.
I know it's a bit unsettling to view or discuss the corpse photo, but to me it's unmistakably James Paul, and is striking proof of his death.
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Jan 3, 2004 9:04:42 GMT
Wings, how do you explain his mouth wounds? What kind of animal could do that? It doesn't look chewed, it looks surgically sliced. If you post the photo from "Free as a Bird," would we be able to see it better? Thanks.
|
|