|
|
Post by SunKing on Feb 12, 2004 16:03:57 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Feb 12, 2004 16:18:03 GMT
BTW
DECCA?
People this is NOT A CLUE.
This is LEGAL EVIDENCE!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by SilverBeatle on Feb 12, 2004 16:50:03 GMT
Legal evidence of what? A bad muzak album?
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Feb 12, 2004 16:58:46 GMT
That Paul McCartney has changed major.  |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Feb 12, 2004 17:02:44 GMT
Now it's really interesting re-read that post.... |
|
|
|
Post by Otacon on Feb 12, 2004 19:02:02 GMT
I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to get at, SK. Are you saying that they were independent at the time (no contract) and offering this as proof? Do we have the details of their contract, because, if we do, we could check to see if it includes work that they do not perform on (not to mention works independent from the band).
Also, who are you saying is the true author (or composer...what ever).
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Feb 12, 2004 20:52:18 GMT
I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to get at, SK. Are you saying that they were independent at the time (no contract) and offering this as proof? Do we have the details of their contract, because, if we do, we could check to see if it includes work that they do not perform on (not to mention works independent from the band). Also, who are you saying is the true author (or composer...what ever). According with quite all the chronologies in mid '66 Beatles contract with EMI was expired. I don't remember a record out on 1963-mid 1966 period with a label different from Parlophone/EMI or Capitol/EMI. If anyone has counter-evidence about is well accepted. Beware: the period to check is 1963-mid 1966. About the true author: I read what you read in that page... |
|
|
|
Post by Otacon on Feb 13, 2004 0:01:12 GMT
I'm sorry, Sunking, I feel like an idiot. I didn't know that Captial was part of EMI.
About the author: I thought you were trying to say that it was someone other than James Paul. Sorry. My state of mind was a little...different at the time than it is now, lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Feb 13, 2004 11:19:45 GMT
Did they actually use some of Pauls' leftover music do you think?
Also, is DECCA related to RCA? Do you think it was DECCA rather than RCA that was the secret deal? Perhaps that was their contractual obligation they had to make in light of the secret signing?
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Feb 13, 2004 11:30:00 GMT
Did they actually use some of Pauls' leftover music do you think? Exactly!  James Paul (and so George Martin) signed a contract "at least" with Decca. " Only 24 minutes in length the album is really a really a collection of film cues based on a single Paul tune entitled, "Love In The Open Air". George Martin then assisted Paul in arranging said tune in a variety of styles to fit in with the fifties/sixties feel of the film, including a brass band version and a Duane Eddy twangy guitar style piece. " So...it was actually based on only ONE James Paul's song. That comment talks for itself. Did James Paul McCartney produced only ONE tune in THREE MONTHS? The Genius was dead. All to investigate on and verify...but just now I have "another" incredible news in my hands ..... I will tell you privately. |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Feb 14, 2004 0:26:31 GMT
AWESOME WITNESS!
|
|
|
|
Post by Otacon on Feb 15, 2004 3:23:48 GMT
Perhaps George Martin meant it as his tribute to Paul (hence all the different arrangements of the same tune, one composer to another).
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Feb 15, 2004 21:59:06 GMT
Perhaps George Martin meant it as his tribute to Paul (hence all the different arrangements of the same tune, one composer to another). Probably. But it is REALLY strange that quite ALL the chronologies tell that James Paul McCartney on the period September 13th - December 20th 1966 was working, as musician, ESCLUSIVELY on that soundtrack. The result: Only one tune. September-October-November-December 4 months - only ONE composed tune..... The Genius was dead...indeed...  |
|
|
|
Post by Otacon on Feb 17, 2004 0:42:14 GMT
I have to admit, that is pretty strange...
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Mar 6, 2004 18:23:38 GMT
Perhaps George Martin meant it as his tribute to Paul (hence all the different arrangements of the same tune, one composer to another). Surely! The last "tribute" to The Genius. And....how that contract with Decca was expired? ...... ...sadly in the "automatic" legal only way: with James Paul McCartney death BTW The Beatles NEVER declared about Faul: "This guy IS James Paul McCartney". They called him only "Paul", meaning: "the character Paul"  |
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Mar 7, 2004 5:01:56 GMT
As if it was a question of casting.
So this movie, for which the music was penned and arranged---was called, "The Family Way", like, this is how we handle it in the family?
And, IF Paul had passed away, then George was able to release his grief into the orchestrating of it. Is that record available? I'll look for it. Suddenly Paul does a soudtrack. Suddenly John does a movie, apart fomr the others. Suddenly George goes to India. Ringo got busy too.
Say, there never was a live command performance of the Beatles again was there?
But if Paul is alive, then. again, I am speculating more emptiness.
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Mar 15, 2004 9:17:30 GMT
Suddenly James Paul McCartney changed Major....
|
|
