|
|
Post by SunKing on Jun 24, 2004 8:18:50 GMT
   Pupil position, iris vertical dimension and eye orizontal dimension perfectly equalized. (triangulation reference law) It means a perfectly identical camera angle. The comparison result reminds me those words: "...however his face as presented was wonderfully compatible as regards to the profile and jaw, two key factors in determining the correct candidate that the cosmetic surgeons could use....and "..along with ears which are orientated differently; a nose that does not look the same overall: Faul's is smaller and is not shaped the same..."Ah....by the way....taken from 60IF |
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Jun 24, 2004 13:41:46 GMT
S.K. - VERY nicely done!
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jun 24, 2004 14:06:10 GMT
Excellent job SK! Most definitely two different guys!!
|
|
|
|
Post by MMCDHoward on Jun 24, 2004 14:57:06 GMT
thats bull, your "triangulation reference law" has no reference that I've ever read, not to mention the fact that the pupils and iris' move depending on what your eyes are focusing on and in which direction, no good, nice try though
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Jun 24, 2004 15:18:55 GMT
Excuse me, WIWY, it is an excellent comparison. Actually, you don't even need the triangulation. Anyone who is a sighted person can see that those are two distinctly different men. I seriously doubt that Paul's chin would have grown "weaker". James Paul always had a very definite strong chin.
Would you like an appointment with my eye doctor?
|
|
|
|
Post by MMCDHoward on Jun 24, 2004 15:24:53 GMT
I can see just fine thanks, looks the same to me. I also notice that you can't deny I'm right about the eyes
|
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Jun 24, 2004 16:26:14 GMT
The eyes look different to me, also  ABBEY - I agree about the chin. One more thing. A friend standing next to me just pointed out that the ears also look very different. This is a boy that is like my son. His only interest in this is that he CAN see the difference. He wouldn't bother commenting if he couldn't. The Beatles aren't exactly his thing  |
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 24, 2004 19:11:23 GMT
Look closely at the difference in the shape of the nostril and the distance between the eye and the bridge of the nose, its shorter for Faul. Faul also has very pronounced cheekbones that JP doesn't have.
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Jun 27, 2004 22:56:57 GMT
Look closely at the difference in the shape of the nostril and the distance between the eye and the bridge of the nose, its shorter for Faul. Faul also has very pronounced cheekbones that JP doesn't have. Perfect analysis. I repeat: from the TRUE VINTAGE DOCUMENTATION the truth is just....PERFECTLY EVIDENT. |
|
|
|
Post by MMCDHoward on Jun 27, 2004 23:45:57 GMT
Look closely at the difference in the shape of the nostril and the distance between the eye and the bridge of the nose, its shorter for Faul. Faul also has very pronounced cheekbones that JP doesn't have. Pronounced cheekbones, could they be more pronounced because they have a big light shining on them? Or is it because Paulie has lost weight and fat isn't covering them up? Same goes for the chin, shape of the nostril is different, but so is the situation, for all we know SK took a point where Paul was flaring his nostrils from the Hey Jude vid, he's singing and breathing irregularly, so he could do that. The eye and the bridge of the nose thing is because both pics are different sizes, as I'll prove soon by posting a version that matches much better (I can't promise perfection though) |
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 27, 2004 23:55:39 GMT
No.
|
|
|
|
Post by MMCDHoward on Jun 28, 2004 0:00:24 GMT
Thank you Red for that intelligent and clear answer, why don't you try actually explaining why they won't work instead of pulling an SK and just giving a one word answer that doesn't mean anything
SK, what was the opacity of the top layer of the fade you used at the top?
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Jun 28, 2004 0:08:35 GMT
Explaining it would do no good for you. You seem to have a vested interest in PIA. Furthermore if you don't have a modicum of visual recognition skills I sure as heck can't give them to you.
|
|
|
|
Post by MMCDHoward on Jun 28, 2004 0:59:17 GMT
I'm afraid its you who is blind, if you look, the features match up fine, except that one is proportionally smaller than the other, so the pics are different sizes, increase the Hey Jude pic (proportionally) and it matches much better, maybe if you'd think for yourselves for once you'd see through the bull SK gives you. SK, will you please answer my question from above the next time you read this?
|
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Jun 28, 2004 1:27:12 GMT
WMWY - I'm waiting with baited breath to see how you force Paul & Faul to match up. And you talk about S.K. ! |
|
|
|
Post by beatled on Jun 28, 2004 2:17:15 GMT
You know... the people who made this man into Paul McCartney probably are amazed that anyone would think they can find a flaw in the work they did. They had to have thought of this beforehand, taking every precaution, measuring every detail. Yes they knew there would be a small suspicious minority. But what was presented to the public at that time was carefully controlled, and they must have been pretty confident that for the most part, the measurements would add up.
|
|
|
|
Post by Perplexed on Jun 28, 2004 4:45:56 GMT
I remember that about a year after "Help!" came out, and it had been playing as a second release at a drive-in theatre in my city, that it was suddenly "pulled" from release. The DJ's at WQXI were talking about it and how weird it was. I had wanted to go see it (I had never seen it or HDN, yet)< my parents finally said they would take me. Then, Im in the car one day at the Zesto's (fast food) , and we are eating in the car, with the radio running. The drive-in is ACROSS the street from where I am sitting. Help! was still playing there---the announcement came, and it left the theatre a day or so later, never to be seen again. The announcer4 said it would be withdrawn for many years to "increase" its drawing power. Which, of course, back then this was a common practice. Look at Gone With the Wind. It was rereleased only so often thru the years. Anyway, the DJ said it would be a LONG TIME before it was shown again. I was dissapointed. So, I never saw till last October at home on a worn out VHS tape from a second string "artsy" movie rental place---the ONLY place in town I could find it.
I have found all this bizarre.
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Jun 28, 2004 10:33:43 GMT
You know... the people who made this man into Paul McCartney probably are amazed that anyone would think they can find a flaw in the work they did. They had to have thought of this beforehand, taking every precaution, measuring every detail. Yes they knew there would be a small suspicious minority. But what was presented to the public at that time was carefully controlled, and they must have been pretty confident that for the most part, the measurements would add up. All that Beatled is just perfectly .....TRUE! |
|
|
|
Post by BillyJones on Jun 28, 2004 12:49:54 GMT
Perplexed - how strange. Thank you so much for sharing that memory with us. I remember seeing Help when I was a child, but I don't remember the circumstances. I wouldn't be surprised if they did the same thing across our country!
Beatled - VERY well said ;D
|
|
