|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 21, 2005 14:42:39 GMT
Sorry, I still don't buy that Paul's eyes were light hazel. They MIGHT have been DARK hazel/light brown. I'll concede a maybe. They seem to have doctored certain things in Help !!! Why then, couldn't they have made Paul's eyes look green like that ? After all, they appear to be the same color that BILL'S eyes are !  Those beautiful BROWN eyes !   Paul's eyes were no more green than George's were  Just compare their eyes in the photo above  BTW - I just noticed something in the matador photo of Paul above. His hand holding the sword appears scarred  Either that, or he had one HELLAVA rash !Does anyone know what the HECK happened to his hand  When was that photo taken T.I said that he got it from a 1966 16 Magazine. |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Mar 21, 2005 14:49:22 GMT
The subject was about shapes not about colour that is easy fo fake.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 21, 2005 16:00:59 GMT
Thank you, B.P. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Mar 22, 2005 21:39:29 GMT
 The "old good" animations.... The same old differences.... No offense, but I don't see a difference. I see him in makeup in the earlier picture, grinning no less. The second, you can't tell if there's makeup and he has less of a grin, not to mention that by my measurements, it's certainly at a different angle with different lighting. There is no comparison because the photos aren't similar enough to judge. |
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Mar 23, 2005 0:28:29 GMT
No offense, but I don't see a difference. I see him in makeup in the earlier picture, grinning no less. The second, you can't tell if there's makeup and he has less of a grin, not to mention that by my measurements, it's certainly at a different angle with different lighting. There is no comparison because the photos aren't similar enough to judge. Close your mouth then you will see your head growing like a balloon because the air inside. |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 23, 2005 16:34:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Mar 23, 2005 20:02:56 GMT
Sis, I think the "scar" is nothing more than light reflection from Paul's "suit of lights." They don't call 'em that for nothing. The light is coming from his right and shining on his hand. His wrist is lower and not in that light, but there's a ripple effect going on there that I think is coming from the jewels reflected on his wrist.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 23, 2005 20:38:14 GMT
I think you are right, gracemer. The rippling affect of the shiny matador costume would give that impression.
The only other explanation would be if the photo shoot was a while after the moped accident and his hand had been scared in that, but I do not really think that's the case.
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Mar 24, 2005 0:26:18 GMT
Yes, I think this picture is reliable and James Paul had eyes colour as dark as George had. Just like in my avatar. |
|
|
|
Post by gracemer on Mar 24, 2005 7:14:41 GMT
Yes, BP! Brown and he's got that thing going on in this pic with his left eye being lower.
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 25, 2005 14:38:53 GMT
At last, we're all FINALLY on the same page ! I agree wholeheartedly that Paul had medium brown eyes ;D
< again claps enthusiastically !!! >
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Mar 26, 2005 4:19:46 GMT
Actually, we're on page 5, the rest are on page 4, but apart from that...  ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Jilli on Mar 26, 2005 4:44:50 GMT
what was it with George and a gun ....he always has a gun. He had a gun in the MMT comic strip. Now he has one here again in that picture posted on page 4
|
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 28, 2005 13:42:45 GMT
I wish I knew, Jilli. It's even creepier when the gun is pointing at PAUL |
|
|
|
Post by abbey on Mar 29, 2005 15:19:41 GMT
Actually in the matador pictures, George's gun is pointed straight ahead. But in MMT it is pointed at "Paul". It's like he is protecting him in the matador pictures, but would like to shoot Faul. And I'm sure he would. George was really upset about Paul's murder. Maybe that was a reason for his turning to Eastern religion, hoping he could contact Paul's spirit.
George might have been "the quiet one", but I feel he was a man of deep feeling and a very strong opinion of right and wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by BeatlePaul on Mar 29, 2005 15:27:50 GMT
what was it with George and a gun ....he always has a gun. He had a gun in the MMT comic strip. Now he has one here again in that picture posted on page 4 Actually in the matador pictures, George's gun is pointed straight ahead. But in MMT it is pointed at "Paul". It's like he is protecting him in the matador pictures, but would like to shoot Faul.  SMA ...what? |
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator 
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Oct 30, 2005 11:15:30 GMT
|
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Oct 30, 2005 23:59:44 GMT
Paul's Rubber Skull.. ;D  |
|
|
|
Post by peoplescommittee on Nov 2, 2005 23:36:02 GMT
Paul's Rubber Skull.. ;D It's as simple as a different hairstyle and his head being cocked a few degrees more to the left. |
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Nov 3, 2005 0:07:28 GMT
No, it's not.
|
|
|
|
Post by plastic paul on Nov 3, 2005 3:33:33 GMT
To be fair thats not the best fade to convince people PID, although i can notice the differences in the pic.
|
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Nov 3, 2005 5:04:14 GMT
Well it wasn't meant to be the best fade showing the differences between Paul and Faul... It was meant to show how FP uses off angle shots to get a so called match... You see in this one..  How Bill's relative eye spacing doesn't change? You see in this one....  How Pauls' head is turned so much that his eye spacing contracts. That's the only way FP can get a 'match' between Faul and Paul This fade.. shows the rubbery skull effect when you line up the teeth..One eye raises the other drops.. the top of the skull twists... |
|
TheDZ
Provocative Operator
Posts: 435
|
Post by TheDZ on Nov 3, 2005 7:12:28 GMT
 Matched by the teeth and horizontal eye level  Matched by eye width. |
|
moped
Contributor
Posts: 115 
|
Post by moped on Nov 7, 2005 14:58:23 GMT
Good stuff DZ.  The PIA insistence on "matching the eyes" is twofold: 1) It tries to "debunk" the eye-spacing argument, simply by scaling the pictures so they're the same. By that logic, the Eiffel Tower and a miniature souvenir of the Eiffel Tower are the same actual size, because photos of them can be matched. 2) As your second fade shows, jaw discrepancies can be hidden in the appearance of movement.  |
|
moped
Contributor
Posts: 115
|
Post by moped on Nov 7, 2005 15:01:34 GMT
|
|
Either that, or he had one HELLAVA rash !Does anyone know what the HECK happened to his hand 
When was that photo taken 
The PIA insistence on "matching the eyes" is twofold:
