|
|
Post by Michelle, ma belle on Mar 11, 2009 1:55:00 GMT
 www.youtube.com/watch?v=sevytMryWvcO.K. short neck, short legs, pearshaped head, short arms... This is James Paul. How did you know this DENS85? Okay you want the truth, then you get the truth. Paul Mccartney in 1966 was indeed in a car accident where he lost his face. He had plastic surgery but could not appear as Paul anymore. He was replaced at the end of 1966 by a look alike but he could not maintain his role. By the time around pepper he was replaced by another look alike. To this date, this person is still Paul McCartney. However, he always had false ears. The real Paul McCartney live anonymously since 1966. After 1966 he had helped behind the scenes and helped the look alike to look more like him. He was also the third man in the video "When we was fab" of George Harrison. Bettina Huber is his real daughter. Paul McCartney sent no likeness to the test itself but the facts are confirmed. The ultimate truth. |
|
|
|
Post by dragonfly on Mar 13, 2009 1:18:55 GMT
Not so far fetched.. See "Twin Freaks" for that which is hidden in plain sight. By "lost his face" I assume you mean it was too damaged to be the Paul we would know. (at the time) Perhaps he and the replacement became close enough in appearance that either one could step in and out of the role?
So why not ditch the replacement over time? Maybe the arrangement was too comfortable after a certain point, and it just worked so..
True dens85?
|
|
|
|
Post by hotman637 on Mar 17, 2009 18:58:36 GMT
How do you know that?  ? What is the evidence? |
|
|
|
Post by mcjarrod on Mar 17, 2009 19:22:22 GMT
Bettina Huber claims that she is a daughter of Paul McCartney... I can't get the link to work,so just do a google advanced search with mccartney in the top box and bettina huber in the box below that.Then click on the tranlate page on the first result. Paul McCartney accused of fraud
" Bettina Huber claims that she is a daughter of Paul McCartney. . In 1983, a paternity test. Recently the 45-year-old Bettina Huber the file accessed. There was a picture of Paul McCartney. According to Bettina Huber is a double from Paul McCartney on the picture. Www.telegraaf.nl I have a photo of Bettina seen where they photograph of a man in her hands. In this photo, Paul McCartney and no dubbellganger. " Obviously not the best translation. From the telegraph.co.uk:Miss Hubers, a former nightclub waitress, alleged that billy's lawyers had approached her three years after Bettina was born, offering to buy her silence. "They paid me 16,000 German marks [then about £7,000] to keep my mouth shut," she said, adding that 30,000 marks was paid to German social services which assisted single mothers. "I wasn't allowed to speak, was forced to keep silent," she said. "I never even told my daughter until she was 12 years old, and she has never met her father." I think this info is already on the site somewhere but thought it relevant here as well. |
|
|
|
Post by mcjarrod on Mar 17, 2009 19:38:36 GMT
What nationality are you dens85, if you are ok with me asking?
|
|
|
|
Post by mcjarrod on Mar 17, 2009 19:49:42 GMT
No problem dens85.
I agree about the internet.They call it a WEB for a reason.
Can you offer any insight to the agenda of the Beatles?
e.g. bringing down christianity, spies(either one or all of them,or managers etc).
|
|
|
|
Post by mcjarrod on Mar 17, 2009 20:17:36 GMT
Well,I'm one of those people who doesn't believe things like Paul being replaced is JUST for money.
With all the other clues,as well as the political climate at the time,especially between the UK and the USA, I am trying to understand even on a shallow level (I know it runs quite deep) what the Beatles were trying to accomplish.
Aiding in bringing down Christianity is an obvious choice,but I feel there was more to it.
Secret service agencies of the Crown and British Military don't get involved in these things just to make more money off a "pop" band.
There was also alot of interest from French and American secret service agencies(which includes parts of the media),among others.
Why?
|
|
|
|
Post by mcjarrod on Mar 17, 2009 21:26:23 GMT
So are you saying that John and George(being attacked) were simply what the media claims it to be?
I was a student of Crowleys work many years ago,among many other forms of "alternative" studies.I have seen enough things to do with the beatles to know there is much more to them than just being a pop band.
Maybe some of them didn't know to begin with and were being used,but I think they all found out at least some details later on.
Many of the clues (to their secret agenda) are in the questions they were asked by foreign media.The "media" definitely were trying to see what the Beatles knew themselves and/or were trying to see if they would let something slip.At other times,it seems the "media" was saying ;"we know exactly who you REPRESENT"
Of course I'm keeping this at a very shallow level,as I know it runs much,much deeper.
I can see many similarities to the Beatles and other secret operations that have been(and still are) used on the public.
|
|
|
|
Post by mcjarrod on Mar 18, 2009 14:51:33 GMT
I don't really understand what you are saying.
I think it is obvious that there was more to the Beatles than just Paul was replaced(or used a double/twin,or was killed or whatever).
(Btw,I like some of the Beatles songs,but I'm in no way a huge fan of them.)
|
|
|
|
Post by dragonfly on Mar 21, 2009 2:29:15 GMT
Your story of what really happened is compatible with mine for the most part Dens. Although, you paint a picture of a Faul going on in the role of Paul McCartney alone and unaided since 1967.. I'm not so sure.
So true that the DJ's of 1969 completely misunderstood the message being sent, although as an aside, there were already rumors of a dead Paul running around England in late 1966... Wonder why? Perhaps word of an accident turned into that he was dead, and it got completely out of hand.
Anyway, I ask you if you think that Paul had nothing to do with his old life and lived in isolation from thereon, or was he involved behind the scenes as the situation called for it? Almost everyone is ready for retirement at 70, almost no one can sit still at 24.. (for very long anyway)
|
|
|
|
Post by dragonfly on Mar 25, 2009 1:51:21 GMT
The guy at the Abbey Road studios (EMI studios at the time) was not Paul McCartney, no way. The guy in the Revolution video was not JPM either, George even turns to him to admonish him to not screw up.. It seems like that anyway.
He was re-married, had a new family...
So, he has a secret identity.. Cmon, drop a hint there bud.. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Red Lion on Mar 26, 2009 3:47:30 GMT
I would say you are correct. |
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Mar 27, 2009 0:23:37 GMT
 This photo?  It seems a mix up between Paul and Faul  But the ear is in a wrong position to Paul. Eye and narrow jawbone are full Faul's. |
|
|
|
Post by dragonfly on Mar 28, 2009 1:56:53 GMT
  The first image is flipped, but we are talking profiles here. Think it over.. The Hey Jude guy is a Faul. |
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Mar 29, 2009 13:39:38 GMT
The first image is flipped, but we are talking profiles here. Think it over.. The Hey Jude guy is a Faul.  You see, it's not the same person |
|
The Fab Faul™
Contributor
Is there anybody Going to Listen To My Story...
Posts: 25
|
Post by The Fab Faul™ on Mar 29, 2009 16:26:10 GMT
I see that that doesn't prove much...
Hey, Dens...could we have some evidence, perhaps?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Mar 31, 2009 15:55:38 GMT
Okay I will help you a little but I do not say too much anymore because I must save privacy of some people and also protect myself. Hopefully you understand this. just tell me who you think this is, Paul or Faul?  That image can't be loaded. Interesting the address of that photo starts from that one: morph.cs.st-andrews.ac.uk/ |
|
The Fab Faul™
Contributor
Is there anybody Going to Listen To My Story...
Posts: 25
|
Post by The Fab Faul™ on Mar 31, 2009 20:13:14 GMT
Okay I will help you a little but I do not say too much anymore because I must save privacy of some people and also protect myself. Hopefully you understand this. just tell me who you think this is, Paul or Faul? It could be easy to prove it without endangering people. Think of a way, then I'll take you seriously. |
|
The Fab Faul™
Contributor
Is there anybody Going to Listen To My Story...
Posts: 25
|
Post by The Fab Faul™ on Mar 31, 2009 20:15:14 GMT
The biggest proof that you are lying is that up until this thread you've been saying "maybe" or "What if". You obviously didn't know the truth then. What changed?
|
|
|
|
Post by yahpete on Dec 7, 2009 11:59:56 GMT
McCartney had an accident on a motorbike in 1965. The trouble with mopeds is that the weight of the bike is too far backward of the central axis. I've ridden bikes (real bikes) where the engine and the rider are centralised. FZR 600s are sweet little machines.
|
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Feb 10, 2010 19:49:41 GMT
maybe, maybe not. I only know that Paul is happy, I can not say more. How many people have to suffer to keep Paul happy? |
|
|
|
Post by daveyo on Feb 12, 2010 14:14:45 GMT
There is something screwy about this thread. That photo showing the Real Paul is not officially dated. Also the real Paul was never known to be on bikes. During 65, he was on Tour, so therefore no accident is known to have taken place. The last known genuine official pic of Paul was at the end of August of 1966. Ever since no further pics since that time. In 67 and 68 John Lennon was writing to the Faul who replaced the real Paul McCartney. This evidence has been verified.
Last of all once dead why would anyone especially a dead person be working behind the scenes.
We also know when Brian Epstein died in 67, only 3 of the Beatles showed up at his funeral and no where was Paul who in fact was very close to Brian himself. So this should say something right there. If the real Paul was alive he would not have missed that funeral at all.
Additionally, why are the Beatles being cremated. With all that money that they have, you would think they would get a decent burial, and or a huge memorial set up so people can view their grave stone and site and look at all the works they have done over the years. It behooves me as important as they were because they did changed the music industry almost over night with a new obvious music beat that even Elvis could not have done himself.
There is something wrong with this thread here and it simply does not add up.
Daveyo
|
|
? What is the evidence?
