Hi;
Read some of your comments. Interesting to say that you might have the first album release of Faul and of his voice.
The voice and vocal octave ranges is your first clue. Compare the octave ranges on the vocals itself.
If you have something like Wavepad by NCH or Zulu DJ software, it would be very interesting for you to sort of broach upon the sound tracks itself.
Everything so far from my investigations, show Paul's voice and vocal octave ranges pretty much remained the same from 62 to end of August of 66. When they made their next appearance in January of 69 during the roof top concert, holy cow, the octave range and voice vocals are totally different coming from this alleged Paul who pops into the scene and this person is much bigger physically as well as his face too.
Now when I checked in prior to 67 of John Lennons voice and vocals they too remained pretty much the same during those same years. When I checked his voice and octave range when he sang in 69 it was IDENTICAL almost a dead match to pre 67 back to 62 especially his talking during the 65 Shea Stadium concert. It did not change at all.
This is your first dead giveaway proof that this person in 69 was not the real Paul but the Faul making his first official appearance live but done on a roof top in January during Frigid weather!!!! Very odd that the Beatles would do something like this to avoid a closer means from the public to scrutinize this new Faul up close for better eye contact.
I myself became very suspicious in 67 when they came out with new songs alleged and sung by Paul McCartney. It did not sound right and not even close and when that voice was merged with John Lennon, wow, totally different.
But I did not know it at the time that something happened to Paul after August of 66. I was very suspicious of it for many many years. When I came upon this site, BAM, things started to happen and the missing pieces and questions that I had all those years started to fall right in like a puzzle.
Ah, yep the Real Paul had damn good looks and a very good facial features. No way would a person who looks that good would want to delve themselves to doing plastic surgery and f**k up their face. So it does make you wonder why this Faul had to do a bunch of plastic surgeries to match the former looks of the missing real Paul McCartney. Right?
Now Michael Jackson did in the early 80's and around the middle part like 85-86 he looked damn good. No pun intended but the plastic surgery did make him look a hell of a lot better. Then he continued to mess with it and subsequently after a few more plastic surgery jobs, he looked very freakish and damn nasty and I could not stand even seeing his pics when he died. He became a freak. In other words he destroyed himself and it was a one way ticket and could not reverse the damage.
Yes George Harrison had the chance to blow the lid wide open, but he elected to take the secret down to his grave to protect his family and also protect the last remaining true Fab 4 being Ringo Starr. Odd that with a house so built like a fortress with anti-intruder gizmos this person who stabbed him inside that home was able to break in and enter that house in spite of all that security he had. This tells me that someone who was paid to protect him became the turncoat and it damn near cost him his life, which points to an inside job. It was right after that attack while in the hospital they also discovered he had Brain Cancer that just started. It would not surprise me that Ringo took note of this as well and I am sure he changes his security people from time to time after a complete background and lie detector check is done on such people.
Anyway, continue to do your research, and I am sure you will be finding many things as you go along.
Daveyo