|
Post by TotalInformation on Aug 7, 2003 4:07:14 GMT
Hello all. First post here.
Great research by Uberkinder and Sun King - kudos.
I think the case is made that McCartney was indeed replaced by this "Faul" regardless of the ultimate provenance of the alleged 60IF document.
I would like to ask Sun King to be more clear about which wording on his "60IF" page is from the pruported document and which is not. Why not just reproduce the translation on a separate page without the commentary and photos mixed in?
-TIA
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Aug 7, 2003 5:11:38 GMT
Actually, it would be good to have a scan of one or two pages of the original document written in it's eastern language.
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Aug 12, 2003 0:37:06 GMT
Yes, that would be Quite helpful, indeed.
|
|
|
Post by Forum Manager on Aug 13, 2003 2:09:32 GMT
yeah, so SK, think u can hook it up?
|
|
|
Post by Zappaisbest on Aug 21, 2003 10:30:58 GMT
My dying last words. Notice how Sun King has ignored ALL requests for a scan of the document. I'm done.
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Aug 21, 2003 10:38:58 GMT
A so precious document.... Already sent to the BEST Friend! Don't worry about, ZIB
|
|