Post by TheeCavendeshLane on Aug 29, 2003 18:28:28 GMT
I know I probably missed it somewhere but what I would like to see
is a page that morphs the William Sheppard photograph from the
White album poster to the Real Paul. There is a great morph
of the white album poster Sheppard into Faul that shows the two
are without doubt the identical person-- Id like to see the same
white album Sheppard photo morphed into the real pre-1966
Paul. Id like to see it done on several pics to be sure. Then you
have a demonstration that the William Sheppard poster photo
is not only the Faux Fowl Fa ool Faul; and that Sheppard is not the
one and only. I just want to say that when I stop to think of it--
of what the Beatles strung together on these albums--it is a work
of Art I think unparalled in the history of Art. Here is what I mean:
The naive view of the Beatles always used the words innocent
and love to describe John, Paul, George and Ringo. Innocent for the
pre-1966 Beatles, Love for post 1967. Their anthem All You Need
Is Love embodied their spirit; Yet their albums at one and the same
time tell one of the most freightening stories told in 20th Century
Art whether movies, literature or music. Each album is a double
telling--a simultaneous telling--a mimic of the human mind--the
conscious act with the simultaneous act of the sub conscious, the
struggle of good and evil each embedded in each other. Hoax? This
isnt a mere hoax, even if it isnt true in the sense of a telling of
something that happened in reality, it is like art a fiction or a hoax
and a high truth at the same time. ---Im not saying its a hoax, im
just saying that if it is a hoax or fiction, its genius.---People always
say -well if its true how come we dont see any bumps in the
in the long and winding road? Shouldnt their be strange events
in the known history of the Beatles? The Beatles have more
tragedy in their history than the Kennedy family--three of them
are thought to be dead--their manager dead--road men dead--
former beatlers dead--beatle friends dead. There are bumps, the
McCartney/ Asher break up, no more live shows, Epsteins death,
lawsuits, The Beatles/Beatles, the end of the Bealtes, more law suits.
There are things like Mcarntey scooter accident, the scar. People
ask-why didnt anyone say anything? John called him Faul.
McCartney doesnt have to be dead. He could be an old man
sitting in a wheel chair in some mansion who doesnt even know
that he is McCartney. But McArtney was replaced. I just cant figure
why some one like George, knowing he was about die, wouldnt
say look Im goint to tell you all explicitly what happened. Its funny
that Paul says he never touched George tll he held his hand
near Geroge's end. Its funny cause Paul says he used to room
with George on tours. Did Faul ask George to do him a favor and
go to his grave without explicitly revealing the truth? Were the clues
a way that all the Beatles were able to release angst over having
to play a game? Were they a tribute in a way to a dead or disabled
Paul? Was a replacement Paul a way of letting the original Paul
make a graceful exit? The replacement really didnt last long, the
band didnt last very long after the clues were brought to
consciousness. --My favorite was always Your Mother
Should Know back wards Why Dont You Ask My Mother Home
to Be Sure? Yeah, why didnt they ask his Mother. The Beatles
wanted someone, the press, who knows, to ask his Pauls mother.
I also thought it was interesting that the shakespeare charachter
quoted from King Lear in Number 9 was Oswald. I always so the
suggestion of conspiracy in that. When I think that it was all done
before computers and before Photoshop, I sometimes think it had
to be done with the help od intelligence agents--Or was Geroge
Martin working for like M-5 on projects involving recordings when
he hit upon the idea to include similar recording tricks into
Bealtes albums? Maybe there are other subliminals in Beatle albums
not related to Paul is Dead clues that have controlled out minds over
the years. Maybe it wasnt the hand of man at work in the albums,
maybe it was a more sinister or more unearthly force? Sometimes
I wonder if Manson wasnt just insane but a tool. A tool whose
specific role was to point to a darker side of the Beatles. Good and
Evil.
At the time the Beatles came to America, there were no British
recording artists popular in America; Groups werent popular at all. No
British artist could sell out a small hall let alone Shea Stadium. How
did they know to book Shea Stadium when they arranged that
tour? Bigger than Jesus.
Ever hear about the Disney / Various Cospiracy conenctions?
The Bealtes owners--the people making the real money--were
connected to The King Features Syndicate--yes-cartoons. I y'am
what I y'am and that all that I y'am...its Biblical in nature.
is a page that morphs the William Sheppard photograph from the
White album poster to the Real Paul. There is a great morph
of the white album poster Sheppard into Faul that shows the two
are without doubt the identical person-- Id like to see the same
white album Sheppard photo morphed into the real pre-1966
Paul. Id like to see it done on several pics to be sure. Then you
have a demonstration that the William Sheppard poster photo
is not only the Faux Fowl Fa ool Faul; and that Sheppard is not the
one and only. I just want to say that when I stop to think of it--
of what the Beatles strung together on these albums--it is a work
of Art I think unparalled in the history of Art. Here is what I mean:
The naive view of the Beatles always used the words innocent
and love to describe John, Paul, George and Ringo. Innocent for the
pre-1966 Beatles, Love for post 1967. Their anthem All You Need
Is Love embodied their spirit; Yet their albums at one and the same
time tell one of the most freightening stories told in 20th Century
Art whether movies, literature or music. Each album is a double
telling--a simultaneous telling--a mimic of the human mind--the
conscious act with the simultaneous act of the sub conscious, the
struggle of good and evil each embedded in each other. Hoax? This
isnt a mere hoax, even if it isnt true in the sense of a telling of
something that happened in reality, it is like art a fiction or a hoax
and a high truth at the same time. ---Im not saying its a hoax, im
just saying that if it is a hoax or fiction, its genius.---People always
say -well if its true how come we dont see any bumps in the
in the long and winding road? Shouldnt their be strange events
in the known history of the Beatles? The Beatles have more
tragedy in their history than the Kennedy family--three of them
are thought to be dead--their manager dead--road men dead--
former beatlers dead--beatle friends dead. There are bumps, the
McCartney/ Asher break up, no more live shows, Epsteins death,
lawsuits, The Beatles/Beatles, the end of the Bealtes, more law suits.
There are things like Mcarntey scooter accident, the scar. People
ask-why didnt anyone say anything? John called him Faul.
McCartney doesnt have to be dead. He could be an old man
sitting in a wheel chair in some mansion who doesnt even know
that he is McCartney. But McArtney was replaced. I just cant figure
why some one like George, knowing he was about die, wouldnt
say look Im goint to tell you all explicitly what happened. Its funny
that Paul says he never touched George tll he held his hand
near Geroge's end. Its funny cause Paul says he used to room
with George on tours. Did Faul ask George to do him a favor and
go to his grave without explicitly revealing the truth? Were the clues
a way that all the Beatles were able to release angst over having
to play a game? Were they a tribute in a way to a dead or disabled
Paul? Was a replacement Paul a way of letting the original Paul
make a graceful exit? The replacement really didnt last long, the
band didnt last very long after the clues were brought to
consciousness. --My favorite was always Your Mother
Should Know back wards Why Dont You Ask My Mother Home
to Be Sure? Yeah, why didnt they ask his Mother. The Beatles
wanted someone, the press, who knows, to ask his Pauls mother.
I also thought it was interesting that the shakespeare charachter
quoted from King Lear in Number 9 was Oswald. I always so the
suggestion of conspiracy in that. When I think that it was all done
before computers and before Photoshop, I sometimes think it had
to be done with the help od intelligence agents--Or was Geroge
Martin working for like M-5 on projects involving recordings when
he hit upon the idea to include similar recording tricks into
Bealtes albums? Maybe there are other subliminals in Beatle albums
not related to Paul is Dead clues that have controlled out minds over
the years. Maybe it wasnt the hand of man at work in the albums,
maybe it was a more sinister or more unearthly force? Sometimes
I wonder if Manson wasnt just insane but a tool. A tool whose
specific role was to point to a darker side of the Beatles. Good and
Evil.
At the time the Beatles came to America, there were no British
recording artists popular in America; Groups werent popular at all. No
British artist could sell out a small hall let alone Shea Stadium. How
did they know to book Shea Stadium when they arranged that
tour? Bigger than Jesus.
Ever hear about the Disney / Various Cospiracy conenctions?
The Bealtes owners--the people making the real money--were
connected to The King Features Syndicate--yes-cartoons. I y'am
what I y'am and that all that I y'am...its Biblical in nature.