|
|
Post by dtripper on Sept 12, 2003 4:14:05 GMT
I say Hello,
I have been an artist since circa 1963, as a young person.
Knowing facial and body anatomy is esential to the process of learning artistic talant. The first drawings I attampted was of the Beatles in 1964, when they became so popular, and, of course I loved them. After becoming perficient in portriats, I realized that Paul, as well as the other Beatles, had special characteristics which couldn't be duplicated. I knew from the beginning of the Beatles separation that there was something wrong with the whole thing. After Paul/Faul appeared in circa 1969, I was convinced that this man, whoever he was, was NOT Paul McCartney. I even made a portrait of this man, and I had much trouble in the area of the chin and left jaw line. Which only goes to prove, at least to me, that this man is not who he is suppose to be. I've read the entire web site and the one thing that I feel was overlooked was the total distance between the bottom of the chin and the bottom of the upper lip of Pau/Faul. This characteristic would be most difficult to disguise, even with plastic surgery.
|
|
|
|
Post by PaulBearer on Sept 12, 2003 6:07:57 GMT
Welcome to the forums Dtripper. Your insight is welcome.
|
|
ivory
Contributor
Meter Maid
Posts: 75
|
Post by ivory on Sept 12, 2003 7:06:45 GMT
Hello, this is my first post, I being an artist myself, I pay great attention to what I see. When I looked at photos of Paul post 66' I knew something was different, and this was even before I had even heard of 60IF or anything. I always knew there was something odd about Faul.
|
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Sept 12, 2003 7:42:31 GMT
WELCOME ivory ;D
|
|
ivory
Contributor
Meter Maid
Posts: 75
|
Post by ivory on Sept 12, 2003 7:45:47 GMT
Thank you very much, I hope joining here will be useful.
|
|
|
|
Post by beldabeast on Sept 12, 2003 12:37:51 GMT
I say Hello, I have been an artist since circa 1963, as a young person. Knowing facial and body anatomy is esential to the process of learning artistic talant. The first drawings I attampted was of the Beatles in 1964, when they became so popular, and, of course I loved them. After becoming perficient in portriats, I realized that Paul, as well as the other Beatles, had special characteristics which couldn't be duplicated. I knew from the beginning of the Beatles separation that there was something wrong with the whole thing. After Paul/Faul appeared in circa 1969, I was convinced that this man, whoever he was, was NOT Paul McCartney. I even made a portrait of this man, and I had much trouble in the area of the chin and left jaw line. Which only goes to prove, at least to me, that this man is not who he is suppose to be. I've read the entire web site and the one thing that I feel was overlooked was the total distance between the bottom of the chin and the bottom of the upper lip of Pau/Faul. This characteristic would be most difficult to disguise, even with plastic surgery. Expert opinion ! Very good ! |
|
|
|
Post by beldabeast on Sept 12, 2003 12:39:32 GMT
Hello, this is my first post, I being an artist myself, I pay great attention to what I see. When I looked at photos of Paul post 66' I knew something was different, and this was even before I had even heard of 60IF or anything. I always knew there was something odd about Faul. I felt it too ! They even quit being my favorite band around the time of Revolver. I NEVER change favorite bands , and the beatles were my favorite-est . |
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Sept 12, 2003 13:15:05 GMT
WELCOME IVORY AND DTRIPPER!!!! ;D ;D We need you here for sure!!! Your opinions are very useful!!!  |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Sept 13, 2003 13:36:24 GMT
"Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among men with whom he is pleased!"
|
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Sept 17, 2003 13:23:34 GMT
Welcome here, DTripper!
Your insight was excellent, has much merit and carries alot of weight; you've been an attentive fan since virtually the beginning, with an eye to detail, and knew something was amiss.
I guess we have to step into a different thought process, or view an alternative context to allow ourselves to accept that the death of Paul would never do; too many people depended upon the Beatles machine for their very lives, too many large corporate entities had multi-millions of dollars invested and at stake.
This was the biggest of the big time, as we must remind ourselves that the apex of success and global fame the Beatles generated was never known before. That is heavy. The heaviest!
So, with historical retrospect we can accept easily that the death of Paul would be covered up, and an imposter would have to be utilized. whomever "they" are, probably manipulated the remaining Beatles by saying 'thousands if not millions of kids will KILL THEMSELVES if they find out paulie is dead!"
Paul is dead. Faul is an imposter. Wish someone in the CIA or FBI would secretly join here, and give us some additional intelligence evidence...you know it's out there, in some Top Secret file.......
Put it this way; when the heroin-addicted Stones came to America in '69 and '72, the FBI PROVIDED THEM with heroin so there would not be any international incidents brought on by them buying drugs here whilst on tour!
If they can do THAT, they can condone just about anything to keep ANYTHING quiet...
|
|
|
|
Post by MrMustard on Sept 23, 2003 13:46:34 GMT
Agree 100% with Ian ;D ;D
|
|
