|
|
Post by mj on Sept 25, 2003 6:58:19 GMT
If Paul and Faul really are two different people, then shouldn't it be easy to tell by comparison of the teeth? Surely there would be an image of Paul and one of Faul that would provide enough evidence to know for sure??  Also, although I am aware that any significant physical differences between the two Pauls would have been dealt with before Faul's entrance into the publice eye, but are there any images showing the Pre-Paul's profile {i.e head on side} in comparison to Post-Paul {Faul}'s profile?? I am still very sceptical about the entire claim, though would definetly love for it to be true - I love a bit of controversy!!  Thanks Everyone!! P.S Beatles Rule!! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by MrMustard on Sept 25, 2003 7:18:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by mj on Sept 25, 2003 8:22:32 GMT
Thanks  I would still be interested on the Teeth follow up though, so if anyone at all has any links or ideas on this, please post!! |
|
|
|
Post by JamesPaul & Brian on Sept 25, 2003 8:34:47 GMT
If Paul and Faul really are two different people, then shouldn't it be easy to tell by comparison of the teeth? Surely there would be an image of Paul and one of Faul that would provide enough evidence to know for sure?? Also, although I am aware that any significant physical differences between the two Pauls would have been dealt with before Faul's entrance into the publice eye, but are there any images showing the Pre-Paul's profile {i.e head on side} in comparison to Post-Paul {Faul}'s profile?? I am still very sceptical about the entire claim, though would definetly love for it to be true - I love a bit of controversy!! Thanks Everyone!! P.S Beatles Rule!! ;D :smile!       |
|
|
|
Post by mj on Sept 25, 2003 10:34:22 GMT
Wow  - judging by those images, the teeth do look significantly different!! Thanks so much for digging up those pictures!!  You can't tell me that dentistry was that good then, can you?  |
|
|
|
Post by kane1000 on Sept 25, 2003 23:16:38 GMT
lets remember though that paul did have a chipped tooth..his let front right front to us .. got it in a moped accident and very obvious in the paperback writer vids.
so that tooth was obviously capped .......just want to throw it in
|
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Sept 25, 2003 23:41:25 GMT
If yer lookin' for comparative visual points, the teeth are ok but nothing to get excited about. Even in the pictures provided in this thread, note ear placement; in relation to where they are on the head, and distance from ear to bottom of neck. They move around a bit! Quite impossible, naturally. Same way with the change in eye distances (apart/close) and head shape. Nose shape, too. These are the visual reference clues to the mighty FAUL.
These are the main points to look for. The Beatles ALL underwent extensive, expensive dental work; capping, crowns, everything. You can do ANYTHING with teeth.
|
|
|
|
Post by LUCY on Sept 25, 2003 23:48:58 GMT
The walrus has a chipped left tusk too. |
|
- judging by those images, the teeth do look significantly different!!
