|
|
Post by FIDllp on Oct 10, 2003 21:16:12 GMT
Well- thanks to my being notified on this thread about the John Lennon/David Frost interview that was rebroadcast in honor of John's birthday, I wasd able to watch it.
Firstly, there was a lot of footage from the early 60's (black and white). It seemed as if they cut as much as Paul out as they could.
Secondly, the interview in 1997 with David Frost and Faul was amazing to watch. First of all, this guy is a real piece of garbage (Faul). He seemed to have no feelings whatsoever for John- and why would he.
Thirdly, I am sure some of you are familiar with neuro-linquistics. When someone is remembering something that actually happened, they will look to the right. When someone is making up something, they will look to the left. FAUL ALWAYS LOOKED TO THE LEFT.
Anyone else notice? Any thoughts?
BTW- I have put everyone I know onto this!! And no one yet has said that they don't see a difference. After scratching their heads for a while and allowing it to absorb, they say, "Yeah, this guy is different".
Amazing what happens when one's reality is shattered!
|
|
|
|
Post by raymi46 on Oct 10, 2003 22:03:22 GMT
I'm so glad you posted that. I totally agree with your interpetation of the Frost interview. Faul (I don't know why it's so hard for me to type that name) appeared totally apathetic over John's death, although he mentioned Princess Di's a few times like he was her best friend or something. Also his physical appearance was as usual not a fleck of the charisma i felt when I watched Paul.
What really caught my eye was when Sir Frost made a comment about the british and about "keepng a stiff upper lip." Faul got a kinda defensive look on his face in a flash and looked down like he was trying to see HIS lip. And when they panned back to Frost, he had a rather strange look on his face as well. That was my perception.
|
|
|
|
Post by raymi46 on Oct 10, 2003 22:21:17 GMT
Btw, what was that comment he made about staying in bed, drunk in Scotland about? Was that supposed to be around the time of John's death?
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 10, 2003 23:24:29 GMT
Thirdly, I am sure some of you are familiar with neuro-linquistics. When someone is remembering something that actually happened, they will look to the right. When someone is making up something, they will look to the left. FAUL ALWAYS LOOKED TO THE LEFT. Anyone else notice? Any thoughts? Another BHLYND's awesome analysis. The King Is Naked! |
|
|
|
Post by FIDllp on Oct 10, 2003 23:50:39 GMT
Thank you, Sun King! I just cannot imagine how people do not want to acknowledge a difference. I know it took me a few days to come to grips with what I saw. One cannot just, at their first viewing of the evidence, say, "Oh yeah....different guy." It's not that easy...because of the ramifications of the reality of the admission. To admit we have been duped means: 1. The entire Beatles could have been nothing more than a created, contrived band designed by far greater, and far more powerful people than you or I would ever be aware of for purposes of changing the cultural perceptions of an entire generation. 2. If this is true, then who knows how many other "certainties" we now believe to be true- are most likely false? 3. Nothing is real! The fact that the clues were included in their albums is still what astounds me! In other words- it was a conspiracy, but not one without the truth being handed to us one album at a time. And since that is true, why tell us? Or, is it Illuminati arrogance? Six weeks ago, I assumed that Paul McCartney was Paul McCartney. I now know that is not true. So, what else? And that is what bothers me! What else? Who are "they" that would do this? What was the real purpose? I listen carefully to John Lennon. I now study his words. He makes sense to me. So why did he, supposedly so detached and unaffected by the supposed establishment, keep up the secret until death? Why was he a part of something so sinister? Or, was he a part of something greater? And if so, what was it? I have actually become quite angry that such a lie is being carried on. And, I still would like to use a picture of Paul and use the age progression technology that is used to age people such as missing children, to see what Paul would look like today. Certainly he would not look like this guy. This guy has a very bad aura about him. I did not like his attitude at all- when talking about his partner in the greatest success in music history- John Lennon. It was all phony. He doesn't even come across like a musician. You cannot fake genius! I tell everyone I know because I believe that veryone has a right to know and judge the facts for themselves. No one has yet said they do not see it (on my end, that is). It just takes a little while, like it did for me, to accept the reality that a great hoax has been carried on for 37 years. Can we ever get anyone to interview Faul about the hoax and ask him pointed questions? Such as, "Gee, Paul, how come you are taller by two inches in less than a year? " Or- "How come your face is narrower and your eyes are closer together?" How about, "Paul. let's talk all about the Paul is Dead 'hoax' and who's idea it was? And, what about all of those clues? Who came up with that? It's almost 40 years later...come on....tell us!" OR- "FOR CHRISTS SAKE!!!! WHY DO YOU LOOK NOTHING LIKE YOU DID UP TILL 1966!!  " I cannot help it....I am angry. BTW- I am not naive. I know this kind of interview will NEVER take place. |
|
|
|
Post by eyesbleed on Oct 11, 2003 2:08:22 GMT
I just cannot imagine how people do not want to acknowledge a difference. Hey tell me about it! Out of all my friends etc there's only 1 or 2 who actually acknowledge somethings wrong with Paul. Most of'em just think I've finally lost it I think. I just talked with an ol'bud & my musical collaborator for the first time in a couple of months & filled him in on what's had my brain tied in knots the last 2 months. He's a MAJOR Beatles fan btw..... anyway his response was a sort of resigned disbelief feeling, like............... Well I guess he's finally lost it, maybe he's been doing way too many substances or something, but if he actually believes what he's saying then he's gone goofy! I kinda knew he wouldn't take this stuff very well!!! |
|
|
|
Post by gharryson on Oct 11, 2003 4:25:30 GMT
the incident with scotland and the bottle i think may have been when the beatles broke up and Faul was hitting the bottle.....
|
|
|
|
Post by raymi46 on Oct 12, 2003 0:23:54 GMT
Thanks, gharryson. I thought that might have been it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Delta on Oct 12, 2003 12:28:53 GMT
1. The entire Beatles could have been nothing more than a created, contrived band designed by far greater, and far more powerful people than you or I would ever be aware of for purposes of changing the cultural perceptions of an entire generation. 2. If this is true, then who knows how many other "certainties" we now believe to be true- are most likely false? 3. Nothing is real! Welcome to the Matrix! By which I mean that, since I came to this forum, some 3 months ago, that movie to me seems to bear more truth than I first suspected. "You take the blue pill and the story ends. You wake in your bed and you believe whatever you want to believe." Often, the official truth feels too comfortable to dismiss. "You take the red pill and you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes." Or are you prepared to accept that a substantial part of your life is a lie. |
|
|
|
Post by pennylane on Oct 12, 2003 12:37:54 GMT
very true Delta... most people are so comfortable with their safe little lives that the blue pill is the only option for them. Only a select few who are truly open minded enough to take the red pill and fewer still who have given up everything to try to expose the lies...  Regardless of your thoughts on David Icke, he is far closer to the truth than most give him credit for |
|
|
|
Post by IanSingleton777 on Oct 13, 2003 12:48:51 GMT
the incident with scotland and the bottle i think may have been when the beatles broke up and Faul was hitting the bottle..... This is supposidly the official party line, pun intended. Word is. ego-tripper Faul holed-up in Scotland, depressed and stayed in bed, didn't shave, drank all day, and even flirted with Heroin briefly! |
|
|
|
Post by Imgonnaopenmymind on Oct 13, 2003 20:42:27 GMT
He also smoked dope and sniffed cocaine during that period. He was a very sick man during that period. It badly affected all that surgery also.
I assume that John's "I Found Out" lyrics, particularly the last stanza, was something to get Faul to wake up and calm down on the hard stuff and continue his solo career, much as John seemed to hate it.
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 13, 2003 20:47:03 GMT
He also smoked dope and sniffed cocaine during that period. He was a very sick man during that period. It badly affected all that surgery also. I assume that John's "I Found Out" lyrics, particularly the last stanza, was something to get Faul to wake up and calm down on the hard stuff and continue his solo career, much as John seemed to hate it. Perfect!  |
|
" I cannot help it....I am angry.
