|
Post by Forum Manager on Oct 13, 2003 3:51:27 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Oct 13, 2003 4:03:12 GMT
I think he and his work were created to purposely discredit the whole Paul is Dead theory. And he's also a friggin' d*ckhead!
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Oct 13, 2003 7:38:51 GMT
yup, I think he's a jackass.
|
|
|
Post by ZioMarco on Oct 13, 2003 9:24:05 GMT
I think he has the maximum interest for denigrate us and the forum. The best that we can do is ignore him.
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 13, 2003 10:41:26 GMT
I CAN'T SEE ONE SLIDE in his "site" as counter-proof. Just full of NONSENSE words. It would be good having him against a (genuine) court.
|
|
|
Post by pennylane on Oct 13, 2003 11:19:04 GMT
well said guys... ;D ;D like i said before he was on C2C.. i have read this guys book he is a total joke.. you want good fiction.. read Robert Jordan
|
|
|
Post by beldabeast on Oct 13, 2003 14:42:54 GMT
I looked at his site . He is a disinformation agent.
|
|
|
Post by Nick109 on Oct 13, 2003 16:08:46 GMT
I dont know, I think he's made some great points. None of you are forensic experts so reading one book is hardly a scholarship. I don't know about some of his corrections, like the one about the source for Paul's song she's leaving home, but some of them made a lot of sense. I especailly thought his point about George Harrison was good. And it is true that he tussled with his attacker.
Its easy for you to mock him cos he disagrees with you, but I don't see any of you proving him wrong!
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Oct 13, 2003 16:25:23 GMT
Nick, you don't know what qualifications the people on this forum have...there are many different types of experts here. As for Patterson: It is against his best (read: financial) interest for what we say here to be right... he is the one with a book to peddle.
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Oct 13, 2003 16:26:39 GMT
.....I don't see any of you proving him wrong! PS -- I don't see you contributing anything to this board. If all you want to do is argue...find another sandbox.
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 13, 2003 16:44:55 GMT
I dont know, I think he's made some great points. None of you are forensic experts so reading one book is hardly a scholarship. Sorry, I am a forensic expert"60IF" site, "Uberkinder site" and ALL the documents in this forum DO PROVE he is wrong. This is THE LAST TIME I reply to such kind of statements. I am understanding John Lennon's feelings about: I'm REALLY tired.
|
|
|
Post by FIDllp on Oct 13, 2003 17:15:46 GMT
I find it interesting that because of Gary's appearance on C2C, hundreds if not thousands were directed to Uberkinder's site. They did, after all, link C2C's site with Uberkinder's. From there I found the board and other great sites like yours, Sun King. I was prepared to be entertained. Instead, I was speechless and have become addicted to this.
If he thinks it is all nonsense, then why did he allow thousands of people to know about Uberkinder's site? He defeated his purpose because I was just an ordinary person who was curious and now believes, based upon the evidence, that this is not Paul McCartney. I can thank Gary for that!
The whole thing may not make any sense to me either, but, like I have said from the begining, these are not the same man.
Saturday night, I had company over and I decided to play Beatles songs all night and to bring up the PID mystery. Interestingly, Michele and Hey Jude were back to back on the CD and after we started the discussion, one of them, a musician, said to me.."Ya know, hearing these songs back to back you can tell that it is not the same man. Hey Jude sounds like Paul- but sounds more like someone trying to sound like Paul."
Everyone was intriqued with the whole thing! We later went down into my office and I showed them all the site- to which then everyone wanted me to e-mail the link to them. Like I said, I have been putting everyone on to this. It's just too incredible. But, no one on my end has not, after studying Paul's real face, manerisms, expressions etc felt that this guy is Paul. None! In fact, they are more amazed that the world has been tricked for 37 years.
I, for one, do not waste too much time studying the 60IF document or other stories, in that I have no way to personally verify them. But, I do have my eyes, my intuition and my intellect....and that all tells me...without a doubt....that this guy is not the same guy!
And Gary's site hasn't a single picture of Paul! If you are going to poke holes in the cross-fades that are being used, then provide your own to show us we are wrong! Of course, that cannot be done, because it is not the same guy! This is insane! -I cannot believe we are having this discussion about 2 different people as if they are the same- when they are not.
And, what's more, the Beatles told us so in a multitude of clues!
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Oct 13, 2003 17:41:17 GMT
BRAVO SUN KING!! ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by xpt626 on Oct 13, 2003 17:48:52 GMT
...Uberkinder's. From there I found the board and other great sites like yours, Sun King. I was prepared to be entertained. Instead, I was speechless and have become addicted to this. .... I do have my eyes, my intuition and my intellect....and that all tells me...without a doubt....that this guy is not the same guy! Me too, BHLYND...I got the link to Uberkinder's site from a completely different place (before C2C) and thought, oh gawd, I can't believe someone is still going on with that nonsense.... then after seeing Uberkinder's and Sun King's sites, I was stunned. I recently spent a few hours looking at pictures of James Paul in actual 1960's teen mags...when you do, it becomes so obvious that he and "the mullet" (someone here, sorry, can't remember who, called Faul that and I laughed myself silly) are two different peeps....
|
|
|
Post by Nick109 on Oct 13, 2003 18:24:05 GMT
Such hostility, could you be getting cranky cos the seems to your theory have been publicly pulled apart. What sort of a debate is this? Are poeple not allowed to argue a different opinion with you?
And I still havent seen anyone actually correct the information he supposedly got wrong.
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Oct 13, 2003 18:38:11 GMT
...and... " FaceIt® ARGUS is a scalable, off-the-shelf facial recognition system that detects and identifies humans as they pass through a camera’s field of view. FaceIt ARGUS maximizes the value of CCTV by increasing deterrence, increasing active surveillance functionality, increasing investigative power and drastically diminishing or eliminating the challenges that exist when relying solely on operators to conduct surveillance.
Built on Identix’ revolutionary Biometric Network Platform and incorporating all the capabilities of the leading facial recognition software engine, FaceIt®, this automated facial recognition system has proven to be an effective investigative tool in helping to identify individuals on a watch list. FaceIt ARGUS has been deployed in town centers, airports and border crossings worldwide.
This state-of-the-art facial recognition system allows you to monitor your environment in real-time with a single camera or an entire CCTV system.
Fast, accurate, and automatic." From this sitePlease look also: [url=http://www.identix.com/ ]this[/url] and this60IF animations were made with the same algorithm of FaceIt®
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Oct 13, 2003 19:32:21 GMT
Such hostility, could you be getting cranky cos the seems to your theory have been publicly pulled apart. What sort of a debate is this? Are poeple not allowed to argue a different opinion with you? And I still havent seen anyone actually correct the information he supposedly got wrong. This is not a debate board! And we are tired of correcting the information of knuckleheads...
|
|
|
Post by JoJo on Oct 14, 2003 21:48:23 GMT
I'd like to second what someone said in that the show on CTCAM was what led me to this board. So I guess the end justifies the means! For anyone not in range of that show's transmitters (Italy for one I would assume) It often is a forum for disinfo and debunking artists. Sometimes it becomes a "dog and pony show" where one guest takes the position of the "crazy" point of view, and the other debunks, meanwhile, they are both working for the same team. I kid you not!
|
|