|
Post by Curious on Nov 1, 2003 12:05:09 GMT
If this is in the wrong forum, someone please move - sorry! members.tripod.com/~holysm0ke/interviews.htmlThis is a collection of Beatles interviews, mostly after 1967, including some very interresting ones with friends and family.
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Nov 1, 2003 12:18:13 GMT
OK, so trawling through that site I found earlier interviews with the Beatles. Reading them, I can't help but notice the general difference in attitude between Paul and Faul. Paul came across as a genuine, nice guy, with a self-effacing sense of humour. Faul is all about the "me, me me". has anyone else noticed this?
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Nov 1, 2003 12:48:09 GMT
Yeah!!!! I have a post somewhere here pointing about that
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Nov 1, 2003 12:50:44 GMT
I couldn't believe the difference in syntax or general attitude. Paul's speech was littered with very English phrases, such as "mate", but Faul used a lot of Americanisms, such as "man", and general American phrasing.
|
|
lennonlives
Contributor
Lennon Lives in the hearts and minds of people he's touched!
Posts: 51
|
Post by lennonlives on Nov 1, 2003 14:17:43 GMT
I couldn't believe the difference in syntax or general attitude. Paul's speech was littered with very English phrases, such as "mate", but Faul used a lot of Americanisms, such as "man", and general American phrasing. true but so did Lennon he was always talking about things like "isn't it a drag man" and things like that but he was a liverpudlian at heart.
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Nov 1, 2003 14:19:25 GMT
The WHOLE syntax, the complete way of speaking altered drastically. The sense of humour dried up totally - this sense of humour being evident right up until the last interviews of August 1966. After that, "Paul" was either monosyllabic, happy to let the others deal with the questions, or he rabbited on about himself all the time.
|
|