|
|
Post by pennylane on Nov 11, 2003 13:18:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by pennylane on Nov 11, 2003 13:19:24 GMT
Another picture from madtitan  |
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Nov 11, 2003 14:16:00 GMT
Notice in the really early pictures that Paul doesn't look as tall as John.  I guess Sun King was right about Paul wearing lifts in his shoes.  |
|
|
|
Post by Eggman on Nov 11, 2003 14:21:02 GMT
Spanky: if you don't mind, I posted this pics in madtitan's thread |
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Nov 11, 2003 14:34:48 GMT
 Here's a photo of Paul from Help !!! YOu can see how slight of build he was. Very different body type then Billy....  Slight of build, but still beautiful... ;D Chris 
|
|
|
|
Post by pennylane on Nov 11, 2003 14:36:21 GMT
Spanky: if you don't mind, I posted this pics in madtitan's thread thats ok eggman, i was just doing a favour for a friend. |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Nov 11, 2003 14:38:34 GMT
Here's a photo of Paul from Help !!! YOu can see how slight of build he was. Very different body type then Billy.... Slight of build, but still beautiful... ;D Chris Whose that shoe? Billy's? ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Curious on Nov 11, 2003 14:47:50 GMT
Well, it's the left one... |
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Nov 11, 2003 15:35:25 GMT
;D ;D ;D Could be !!!!! ;D ;D ;D You guys are a hoot !!!! Chris |
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Nov 11, 2003 16:55:53 GMT
Notice in the really early pictures that Paul doesn't look as tall as John. I guess Sun King was right about Paul wearing lifts in his shoes. , when I said something it's BECAUSE I've found evidence about BEFORE. I have a picture taken from MOJO magazine where it's CLEARLY shown that James Paul wore shoes with internal lifts. The plantar shape talks for itself.... |
|
madtitan125
Contributor
"There is no knowledge that is not power!"
Posts: 126
|
Post by madtitan125 on Nov 11, 2003 23:55:13 GMT
Thanks for posting those pix!
The guy gnawing on his right hand and towering over John couldn't be James Paul. Until next time...Bye bye
|
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Nov 12, 2003 2:22:07 GMT
Darkhorse, when I said something it's BECAUSE I've found evidence about BEFORE. I have a picture taken from MOJO magazine where it's CLEARLY shown that James Paul wore shoes with internal lifts. The plantar shape talks for itself.... Sun King, can you post this pic?  |
|
|
|
Post by TheWatusi on Nov 12, 2003 3:55:25 GMT
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;DHa!
yes, could that photo be posted?
|
|
|
|
Post by SunKing on Nov 12, 2003 8:37:09 GMT
Of course! Gimme a bit of time..... |
|
|
|
Post by Chris on Nov 12, 2003 13:42:07 GMT
S.K. - I'd like to see it too. So, my guess is James Paul was maybe 5 ft. 7 in. tall or 5 ft. 8 in. tall  I'm only 5 ft. 1 1/2 in. tall. That's plenty tall for me ;D ;D ;D Hee, Hee !!!! Chris ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Darkhorse on Nov 12, 2003 14:37:57 GMT
S.K. - I'd like to see it too. So, my guess is James Paul was maybe 5 ft. 7 in. tall or 5 ft. 8 in. tall I'm only 5 ft. 1 1/2 in. tall. That's plenty tall for me ;D ;D ;D Hee, Hee !!!! Chris ;D I would say 5'10". Not much shorter than George and John, but with the lifts the same height or slightly taller than each of them. |
|
madtitan125
Contributor
"There is no knowledge that is not power!"
Posts: 126
|
Post by madtitan125 on Nov 12, 2003 17:21:31 GMT
Hey Sun King,
If you have it on file, please try to also post pic of "Beatles: In Their Own Words".
Maybe you could zoom in on Faul's face, so we can all get another good look at his scars and those big shiny coffee brown contacts.
Take care. Bye
|
|
Here's a photo of Paul from Help !!! YOu can see how slight of build he was. Very different body type then Billy....
I'm only 5 ft. 1 1/2 in. tall. That's plenty tall for me ;D ;D ;D