The Neil Aspinall "Solution" !?

[captaintruth]

Hi !

Everyone opening this homepage comes across the following :

"At last we know the true identity of Paul's replacement!
Please see this thread for more information and photos. "Faul" is truly someone who worked closely with the Beatles before Paul's death. The identity of Brian Epstein's replacement has also been revealed. Click here to see who Frian was."

This is really suggestive, because it implicates that it is true fact. But as we all know after the long lasting discussion in this forum, it is not very likely that Neil Aspinall & Don Knotts have anything to do with the replacements of Paul and Brian Epstein !
It would be only fair not to present something as a result, if this is
far from reality.
Has anyone more massive clues that these two persons are definetely the supposed replacements. If not, the website producers should think of changing this opening...

captaintruth

[plastic paul]

I'd go with that, it's a good point.

[unrepentant]

dear sun king,

you stated you had massive revelations that you would share with us when the war in iraq ended. well......

since the iraqi war will not end, but more likely turn INTO the iran war, and one or two others after THAT, we simply cannot wait for you to provide all the remaining pieces of the puzzle that you no doubt have. you are the only person in the whole world who has proof of these things who has expressed willingness to PRESENT it. if not this summer, WHEN?

RAPIDAMENTE, GRAZIE!!

respectfully......

v i c t o r

[sweetlorettamartin]

We do have a dilemma....who replaced Don Knotts? Who replaced Neil if Neil became Faul?

[Sun King™]

sweetlorettamartin said:

We do have a dilemma....who replaced Don Knotts? Who replaced Neil if Neil became Faul?

No one replaced Don Knotts (there was no need...)
We counted two or three appearances as Frian by him.....

Witnesses tell that "Brian" acted like a child during the "All You Need Is Love " show....

Apollo C. Vermouth told me that Neil was always Neil .... Bill was just another person ..... in the same time ....

The confusion was from those who wrote comments to photos

[Maacc]

Sunking, as you probably know, many forum users question or completely reject the Neil-is-Faul scenario. Some questions:

1 What "witnesses" said that "'Brian' acted like a child" during AYNIL show?
2 What does this behaviour prove, or what are you implying?
3 Why should Apollo C Vermouth's opinion be given special credence?
4 As the poster pointed out, you previously said that once the Iraq war was over, you would reveal all. Are you now prepared to release further information/evidence. If not, do you actually have any more information/evidence. When are you prepared to release it?

Any reply will be gratefully received. Thanks.

[unrepentant]

i say go with the simplest, most logical explanation for it all. if you see hoofprints think horses, not unicorns.

paul died and brian died and for reasons we are just begining to understand "they" had to maintain an illusion to the contrary for an indefinite period. i am willing to consider the chance that bill was installed in '64 - '65 as an "understudy" by the powers that be for the sole purpose of replacing JPM, two or three years later. in keeping with this "simple is best" approach to sorting this mess out, the role of neil aspinall and mal evans was most likely simple too. limited to just the minimal things necessary to keep up appearances, fend off the press, and groom bill for his role as paul.

ah, can't wait for the book. i wonder who will have the honor of writing the first REAL tell-all beatles book?

[byrdsmaniac]

Kitty Kelly, of course! ;D

www.geocities.com/cash_gorman/stories/kittykelly.html

[Lic.Teish]

Paul WAS Warewolf NEIL