|
DUH!
Sept 6, 2006 21:05:20 GMT
Post by unrepentant on Sept 6, 2006 21:05:20 GMT
i mean, it's so simple to prove that paul is NOT who he says he is that it makes me giggle. FINGERPRINTS. when the beatles were touring [as well as at other times] they had to give their fingerprints, and some of those fingerprint cards are still available. there is no way that "coverup central" could get every card from every country...things like that tend to find their way home to employees' attics, ect.
[think of one of them turning up on E-bay...wouldn't THAT make faul's day??? hee hee!!!]
JUST COMPARE THE FINGERPRINTS. it's that simple. you wouldn't even need faul, just something official with the prints.
i brought this up a couple of years ago, but no one seemed to be impressed. maybe that's why this thing is dead in the water. :-(
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 6, 2006 22:32:43 GMT
Post by defhermit on Sept 6, 2006 22:32:43 GMT
you would need a fingerprint that was authenticated... and THAT, the powers that be COULD have eliminated by this point...
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 7, 2006 1:56:12 GMT
Post by Paulythene Paul on Sept 7, 2006 1:56:12 GMT
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 7, 2006 5:15:22 GMT
Post by Perplexed on Sept 7, 2006 5:15:22 GMT
Well, OK, you Go!, Linky and Dinky! Clearly a fantastic fiction, but an interesting one. They also have a discussion on Peak Oil here: www.linkydinky.com/peakoil.shtmlNow,since we KNOW that "Peak Oil" is a fiction and has been thouroughly disproven (or has it ) then we must conclude that their whole web site is just a gag, ergo, this Elvis tale is fabricated, as if one could not tell from reading it. ...............or is it? It's a fun site. I think I'll forward it out to my friend Jon in Arizona. He'll get a kick out of it. Off topic, I thought this page of theirs was nifty: indexed.blogspot.com/
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 7, 2006 13:29:43 GMT
Post by unrepentant on Sept 7, 2006 13:29:43 GMT
but fingerprints are often enlarged, then copied, sometimes stored on microfilm.....i don't think authentication would be much of a problem. there is much the beatles did before the events of late '66 that has 1) slipped attention and 2) left biometric data.
sitting here getting tans in the english rain is not accomplishing much for the cause.
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 7, 2006 13:50:19 GMT
Post by defhermit on Sept 7, 2006 13:50:19 GMT
I'm talking about the kind of authentication that is needed when fingerprints are used in court cases. Sometimes the fingerprint evidence is thrown out of court because the detectives couldn't account for the whereabouts of the fingerprints for like 1 day of a years-long investigation. That taints the "chain of evidence" and the judge throws it out.
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 7, 2006 13:53:05 GMT
Post by plastic paul on Sept 7, 2006 13:53:05 GMT
Nothing is ever that cut and dry unrepentant.
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 9, 2006 8:58:24 GMT
Post by Sun King™ on Sept 9, 2006 8:58:24 GMT
you would need a fingerprint that was authenticated... and THAT, the powers that be COULD have eliminated by this point... Yes. Japanese Police ALREADY knows that Faul is not Paul. Old News.
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 9, 2006 12:53:07 GMT
Post by Perplexed on Sept 9, 2006 12:53:07 GMT
you would need a fingerprint that was authenticated... and THAT, the powers that be COULD have eliminated by this point... Yes. Japanese Police ALREADY knows that Faul is not Paul. Old News. So, are you saying, that in SOME countries, the "jig is up?"
|
|
ilras
Contributor
Posts: 62
|
DUH!
Sept 12, 2006 1:23:42 GMT
Post by ilras on Sept 12, 2006 1:23:42 GMT
Yes. Japanese Police ALREADY knows that Faul is not Paul. Old News. So, are you saying, that in SOME countries, the "jig is up?" I think he means that they know it as they arrested him. But, SK, I don't think they also have the JPM's ones, so they can't compare them.
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 12, 2006 17:22:35 GMT
Post by unrepentant on Sept 12, 2006 17:22:35 GMT
i think they DO have james paul's... but anyhow, i am not talking about the exacting standards of a court of law here, or a media circus of O.J. proportions with the state seeking to prove that paul is an imposter. it's merely having the right no-nonsense people see with their own eyes that something very, very weird is going on here. for me, the court of public opinion is by far the best venue to "try" this case.
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 14, 2006 18:00:29 GMT
Post by Sun King™ on Sept 14, 2006 18:00:29 GMT
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 15, 2006 3:25:49 GMT
Post by Jilli on Sept 15, 2006 3:25:49 GMT
ok what im reading in this article that Sk posted is this: www.geocities.com/~Beatleboy1/db63066.pc.htmlIn 6/30/66 the Beatles appeared in Japan and were questioned about their medals. The Beatles had already received their medals from the Queen before this interview. So it was Paul not Faul who got the MBE Medal. I wasnt sure what MBE stood for so I googled it and on this web page it explained what MBE means: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_the_British_EmpireOrder of the British Empire From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Most Excellent Order of the British Empire is a British order of chivalry established on 4 June 1917 by King George V. The Order includes five classes in civil and military divisions; in decreasing order of seniority, these are
Knight or Dame Grand Cross (GBE) Knight or Dame Commander (KBE or DBE) Commander (CBE) Officer (OBE) Member (MBE) Only the two highest ranks entail admission into knighthood.so if this information is correct, Faul calling himself, Sir, is in error, because the Sir title was only for GBE, KBE or DBE medals. Sir refers to Knighthood. I realize that Sir is used in other ways, but the way Faul has been using it, he is designating himself as a Knight. The title of MBE is not a Knight designate. So not only is he impersonating Paul, he is also impersonating a Knight of England. Thats pretty cheeky of him.
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 15, 2006 3:58:07 GMT
Post by Jilli on Sept 15, 2006 3:58:07 GMT
Sun King where did you read that Japan takes finger prints of all new arrivals in Japan? Im not saying you are wrong. I just wanted to know where to find that information. I looked in the articles you posted and didnt see any reference to that.
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 15, 2006 14:50:41 GMT
Post by plastic paul on Sept 15, 2006 14:50:41 GMT
so if this information is correct, Faul calling himself, Sir, is in error, because the Sir title was only for GBE, KBE or DBE medals. Sir refers to Knighthood. I realize that Sir is used in other ways, but the way Faul has been using it, he is designating himself as a Knight. The title of MBE is not a Knight designate. So not only is he impersonating Paul, he is also impersonating a Knight of England. Thats pretty cheeky of him. Thats not strictly true, JPM was awarded the MBE, Faul was honoured in the Queens list a few years ago and was officially "Knighted" becoming billy McCartney. Something like that anyway!!!
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 15, 2006 17:49:26 GMT
Post by Perplexed on Sept 15, 2006 17:49:26 GMT
so if this information is correct, Faul calling himself, Sir, is in error, because the Sir title was only for GBE, KBE or DBE medals. Sir refers to Knighthood. I realize that Sir is used in other ways, but the way Faul has been using it, he is designating himself as a Knight. The title of MBE is not a Knight designate. So not only is he impersonating Paul, he is also impersonating a Knight of England. Thats pretty cheeky of him. Thats not strictly true, JPM was awarded the MBE, Faul was honoured in the Queens list a few years ago and was officially "Knighted" becoming billy McCartney. Something like that anyway!!! Well, no matter how you dice it, between billy and Doris, we have Knight and Day. ;D wa'aaaah-----wah-wah-wah-waaaaaaahhhhhh! *snort-giggle*
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 16, 2006 0:03:27 GMT
Post by plastic paul on Sept 16, 2006 0:03:27 GMT
lol
How do you get away with it!?
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 16, 2006 7:16:26 GMT
Post by Perplexed on Sept 16, 2006 7:16:26 GMT
lol How do you get away with it!? Do I?
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 17, 2006 5:05:34 GMT
Post by Perplexed on Sept 17, 2006 5:05:34 GMT
lol How do you get away with it!? Do I? OK, clearly I do. Must be Grace from on high.
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 17, 2006 8:22:22 GMT
Post by Jilli on Sept 17, 2006 8:22:22 GMT
Plastic Paul, I really go to a lot of trouble to show evidence for my post. Posted by Plastic Paul: (Thats not strictly true, JPM was awarded the MBE, Faul was honoured in the Queens list a few years ago and was officially "Knighted" becoming billy McCartney. Something like that anyway!!!) This is the first I have heard of this. So, pretty please, could you come up with a web page or something to show where you got your info from? I would really be interested in reading about that. Thanks Jilli
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 17, 2006 19:36:35 GMT
Post by jourdemavie on Sept 17, 2006 19:36:35 GMT
Sun King, I feel so sorry to be late to this thread...... I've always searched for documents,books and magazine articles to find out if any of them can prove that the Immigration Bureau of Japan actually took JPM's fingerprints as the Beatles entered Japan in June 29,1966----on the side of a Japanese,but to no avail. What I can't figure out so far is that while the Japanese government has recently started to take any foreign visitors' fingerprints and pictures of their faces as part of anti-terrorism campaigns requested by the US,whether that procedure was a common practice in the pre-911 era. www.immi-moj.go.jp/english/keiziban/happyou/law43_20060524.pdf I wish the local musical magazines of the day had chronicled how the band's immigration procedure went in detail! Incidentally,in contrast, the menus of the meals they had during their 5-day stay was specifically described in various books.Interestingly enough,this serves well to shed a light on HOW JPM ATE DIFFERENTLY from the others circa 1966,thus proving that Faul and JPM are totally different persons with different stomachs(Or should I say, intestines)but I guess that's another story.
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 17, 2006 21:52:27 GMT
Post by plastic paul on Sept 17, 2006 21:52:27 GMT
|
|
|
DUH!
Sept 18, 2006 3:41:16 GMT
Post by Jilli on Sept 18, 2006 3:41:16 GMT
Thanks PP, I stand corrected. He was knighted. My apologies Sir Faul.
|
|