|
|
Post by beldabeast on Jun 28, 2007 1:11:50 GMT
About a year ago Patterson was on Coast to Coast with George Noory . George was allowing he had seen the photographic comparisons and they looked different to him. Patterson replied that this was caused by the camera angles !
In other words , the millions of pics taken before Sept ,1966
was taken at the right angle and the millions takensince were all at the wrong angle . I will let that statement speak for itself !
|
|
ilras
Contributor
Posts: 62
|
Post by ilras on Jul 2, 2007 22:56:57 GMT
Interesting!
What's the source of that?
|
|
|
|
Post by beldabeast on Jul 3, 2007 14:11:36 GMT
Source ? Gary R Patterson made that claim in the course of a interview on a national radio talk show .
George let it pass but I could sense he wasn'tbuying it.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheAquaOne on Aug 23, 2007 5:56:03 GMT
I heard that show too unbelieveable that he would use such a lame excuse. Maybe he was told to hush up about it or just doesn't want to get into it anymore. Either way it makes everything else he speaks or writes on less credible.
|
|
|
|
Post by lelocomotion on Aug 31, 2007 1:40:22 GMT
Just to remind everybody- Patterson wrote the book called "The Walrus Was Paul", which supposedly examined the clues.
|
|
|
|
Post by wld_life on Sept 22, 2007 4:51:19 GMT
I believe he said that there is basically no legal grounds in forensics for photo comparisons. I would like to know if that is true?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sun King™ on Sept 22, 2007 15:04:58 GMT
I believe he said that there is basically no legal grounds in forensics for photo comparisons. I would like to know if that is true? I don't mind "no legal grounds in forensic" I see the Biometrics science: www.l1id.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=17&Itemid=127and what it is stated there: "ABIS® System FaceExaminer
Use surveillance video footage and still images to more effectively solve crimes." |
|
